Stacey Barker Murder Trial - Day Two

by katfish | May 6, 2011 at 11:28 am
7829 views | 5 Recommendations | 140 comments

Photos

Emma Barker | Photo 08

Emma Barker | Photo 08

see larger image

uploaded by katfish

Day two (Thursday, April 28 ) of the Stacey Barker murder trial was a frustrating day pretty much all around. Sue Barker, the defendant's mother,  was back on the stand for more direct questioning by Deputy District Attorney (DDA) Kelly Cromer. The day was frustrating for DDA Kelly Cromer  because Sue Barker seemed to have developed a serious case of the "I don't recall" syndrome....the state had requested  the court to declare her a hostile witness yesterday.....and the court agreed. (Sorry missed reporting this yesterday)

The day was also frustrating  for our friends, here is what Tori had to say about Sue's testimony, " I felt so sorry for her I could feel her pain and she looked like she was in a daze...this has taken a toll on her, Ange commented that she felt like she just wanted to hug her and tell her it was NOT her fault, that she felt heartsick for this woman she did not know...a husband that would leave her in her greatest pain for thoughts and words she said about her daughter. A daughter that had killed her only grandchild, she is in great fear of losing her husband now...how sad she loses her granddaughter, her daughter and if Stacey is convicted because of her testimony she may also lose her husband, because Stacey Barker is a "Daddy's girl" and always has been.

Just hearing Tori's description makes Sue's pain palpable for me. Does it you? No doubt, this was one of the more frustrating days of Sue's life. She learned she was recorded in an interview with the homicide detectives when she said of her daughter, " I know she did it, and I want you to prove it". Her gut instinct was justice for her granddaughter, not of making up lies to protect her daughter. If you haven't seen them already, Tori very kindly made several comments here giving her impressions of the day.

There was something worrisome that happened in court after the jury was dismissed yesterday. Our friends learned today that Judge Zackey advised both parties that he wants Sue Barker examined and her testimony is to be recorded in case something were to happen to her. The court didn't expand on that, but I think we can read between the lines :(  


There's a lot to say so I'll get to reporting the court business and testimony. Before the jury was brought in for the day's testimony,  DDA Cromer had some things to say about the first day of trial and Stacey Barker's Public Defender, Roberto Dager. Kelly made it clear to the court that she was mad at things PD Dager had said in his opening statement. Cromer felt that that Dager's concentration in his opening on condemning the state and detectives including making personal attacks against them for recording X's conversations with Barker was misconduct. Judge Zackey agreed with the state. Zackey said if it was misconduct, it will not be tolerated, adding he will read the transcripts of the defense opening and would rule later. (I wonder if he will wait until after trial to make a ruling?)   

There is a few other issues for the court to discuss before testimony could start, Judge Zackey advised both parties that someone had called the LA County Sheriff's Office to report that Sue Barker was heard talking about her testimony in the hallway in front of some jurors. Judge Zackey had the jury brought in and questioned them whether they had overheard anyone talking about the case in the hallway during break. No one on the jury had heard anyone talking about the case, so the judge reminded them of the admonishment not to talk to anyone about the case or allow anyone to talk to them about it. If this did happen he advised them to talk to Johnnie, the court's bailiff who would let him know.

( An interesting side note is Tori had mentioned she saw and heard Brendon Borrelli's mother talking to Gary Barker and Brendon in the hallway about Sue's testimony during a break . Seems important enough to mention now....did someone else witness the same and get confused who was who and reported it, or was the incident reported with Sue a different incident?) 

Here is the abbreviation key I will use for the defendant and those speaking in court today....

"JZ" for Judge Hayden Zackey
"KC" for Deputy District Attorney Kelly Cromer
"RD" for Deputy Public Defender Roberto Dager
"SB" for Stacey Barker
"Sue" for Sue Barker
"Hoyt" for Detective John Hoyt
Testimony started at 11:20 today with more direct examination of Sue Barker by DDA Kelly Cromer. I'll use the same Q&A format as yesterday.

Direct Examination- Sue Barker
KC
- Who are the people out in the hall ? Sue - My husband and my sister. KC - The husband you told Detective Nava that you didn't want to lose? (No response noted.)

KC - Who came into the courtroom yesterday after the second break?  Sue - I don't know. KC - No one came in ?  Sue - I was. KC - Did your son Matt come in ? Sue - Yes. KC - That was the same time that you seemed to have some lapse in memory. Is it hard for you to testify? Sue - Yes. KC - Why? Sue -  It just is. KC - Do you feel guilt because of the argument you had with Stacey?  Sue - Yes

KC -  Did you tell Detective Nava that you and Stacey had argued in recent weeks before Emma's death and you said something about kicking her out? Sue - I don't know. KC - Did you know that interview was recorded? Sue - I didn't see a recorder.

KC - Did you tell Detective Nava that Brendon Borrelli might be a suspect? Sue - Yes  KC -  Did Det. Nava say that if Brendon had told her to do it it was still her decision? Sue - I know it was Stacey's doing.

KC - Anyone in the family in the legal profession? Sue - Not that I know of. KC - Any relation, not just immediate family? Sue - Gary's sister is a para-legal but I haven't talked to her about this.

KC - You don't recall searching the house for Emma's binky (pink blanket) ? Yesterday you said didn't remember looking for it but today you remember asking Stacey, who said it was in the car. Sue - Yes, but...

KC - Did you ask Stacey why she didn't leave the blanket with Emma's body? Sue - Yes, but she didn't answer.

KC - Did Stacey keep granola bars in her purse for Emma?    Sue - Yes, that was standard.

KC - Whose idea was it for you to have a conversation with Detective Nava at the station?
Sue - Don't know.

KC - Yesterday you said that you remember Emma playing with Stacey's purse. Did you tell detective Nava that it was unusual for Emma to play with her purse? (no response noted)
KC - (Gets out the letters alleged to be written by Stacey to Witness X and pulls out 4 of them) Sue, is this Stacey's writing? Sue - Yes  KC -  (shows Sue exhibit 1e, an envelope from the pack with butterflies drawn on it.) Wasn't that on Emma's Binky? Sue - Yes, there were butterflies on Emma's Binky.
KC -  No more questions.

Cross Examination - Sue Barker

RD - Mr. Dager greets Sue Barker....How are you?  Sue - Fine. RD - You never wanted to talk to me before? Sue - No RD -Do you want to now? Sue - Yes.

RD - Stacey attended Quartz Hill High school, and handed Sue some papers to look at. Sue - These two pages I have never seen. The third page I have seen. RD - When did you see this? Sue - Sometime near graduation. RD - What does it say? Sue - Academics RD - What does it say? Sue - 3.5 RD - Say the whole number. Sue - 3.055 (Tori noted that Dager seemed pretty pleased with himself  after Sue read all the digits. DOH! That makes her GPA 3.1 not 3.5 !)

RD - Did Stacey have any history of street fights? KC - Objection, speculation. JZ - Rephrase. RD - have you seen her come home with any bumps, cuts, or bruises? Sue - No. RD - How many physical fights have you seen her have with her brothers? Sue - Once in her whole life.

RD - When did Stacey move back home? Sue - When she found out she was pregnant at age 23. She moved out when she was 18. At 18 she had her own apartment. RD - How many jobs did she have to work to afford her own apartment? Sue - Two. RD - Kind of hard to work two jobs when pregnant?
Sue - Yes, because she couldn't keep the pizza job. RD - Did she go to college? Sue - No. RD - Why? Sue - Because she worked two jobs , she didn't have time.

RD - Has she always been emotionless? She never cried before Emma died? Sue - No, she has only cried 10 times in her whole life. She was never an emotional person.

RD - So, are you an alcoholic? Sue - Yes. RD - Did you drink daily before Emma died? Sue - No, just a couple days a week. RD - Did you drink Jose Quervo tequila? Sue - Yes, shots of Jose Quervo. RD - Were you taking depression medication at the same time? Sue - Yes. RD - Pills and alcohol? Sue - Yes.
RD - Did you know that could kill you ? Sue - No. RD - You've been sober 13 days? Sue - Yes.

RD - When did Stacey move back home? Sue - Immediately when she found out she was pregnant.
RD - How long was that? Sue - She was a month or two.

RD - What if anything did Stacey tell you about Anthony? (Emma's Dad) Sue - Nothing. RD - How many times did you see Anthony at the house? Sue - Once at her house. RD - Did you ask he3r why she didn't live with him? Sue - No. RD - What did you say to Stacey about Anthony? Sue - That he didn't seem to be concerned about being a dad.

RD - How many bedrooms are there in your home? Sue - Four, one room was an office that we turned into a bedroom for Emma when she was about 3 months. RD - So where did Emma sleep the first 3 months?
Sue - In Stacey's room. RD - Who suggested changing the office into a room for Emma?  Sue - I did.

Court broke for lunch here and returned at 1:30 pm.

RD - What was the daycare when Stacey went back to work? Sue - Emma went to daycare for one day.
RD - Why only one day? Sue - Because I went to daycare to pick up Emma and it wasn't good, she wasn't being cared for as she should have been. RD - What was Stacey's demeanor when you told her about the conditions at daycare? Sue - She cried. RD -  Why did she cry? Because her daughter wasn't being cared for?  Sue - Yes, I suggested going back on nights so that Emma could be cared for in the day without daycare. Nick cared for Emma during the day until I could get back on nights. That took about a month, I cared for Emma from 4 to 18 months. Stacey started out working an eight hour shift, the eight am  to five pm. Stacey asked to go in earlier and earlier so I could sleep.

RD - You went to see Stacey at Linwood (Detention center) once and called her only once. Why? Sue - I wasn't happy with Stacey. RD - Do you want to see her now? Sue - Yes.  RD - Did anyone tell you what to say? Sue - No. (◔_◔)

(Tori made a note before this question was even asked, that it did appear that Sue had been coached compared to her testimony yesterday.)
 
RD -  These are defense exhibits, pictures A-G. Who is in the pictures and what is she wearing?
Sue - Emma. RD - Who bought the dress she is wearing? Sue - I did. RD - Dager showed Sue photos B-G and each picture asked, "Who bought this dress she is wearing?" Sue - Each time asked, Sue responded, "I did".

(Tori notes that yesterday Sue testified she bought all the toys for Emma and Stacey bought her clothes....guess one or the other response is false. She also noted some jurors looked back in their notes after this round of Q&A. )
 
RD - This receipt is defense exhibit (#?), it's a Target receipt dated March 17, 2009. Junior - ears are purchased, is that familiar? Sue - Yes. Stacey bought it. RD - What is it? Sue - 2 pairs shorts, 2 shirts, sandals and tennis shoes. RD - Where did the receipt come from? Sue - I gave it to the defense investigator. I found it on top of Emma's dresser.
 
RD - This next item is is defense exhibit H, a Baby Blender Cookbook. Why did Stacey have this book?
Sue - because she didn't want Emma to have processed food. Stacey herself ate healthy after she became pregnant. RD - Did she use these recipes? Sue - Yes, she made them and froze them for Emma. RD - Do you recognize this book?  Sue - Yes, it was in Emma's room too and I gave it to the investigator. RD - You did? Sue - Well...Gary did. (Sue's husband, Stacey's dad) RD - So she blended meat and vegetables and fruit? Sue - Yes, to freeze for future use.
 
RD - Did Stacey tell you she was going out for St. Patricks ? Sue - no, she didn't say.
 
RD - When was the last you saw Stacey and Emma? Sue - On March 18, when Stacey came home from work. RD - At 3:15, did you argue? Sue - Yes. RD - How long did it last? Sue - 5 minutes. RD - Was there screaming?  RD - Stacey was screaming she couldn't make anyone happy. I told her she needed to come home on time so I could rest.
 
RD - When did you find out what happened? Sue - On March 18 at 11 pm, I got a call at work from Gary to tell me what happened. Gary picked me up from work and we went to the Park n Ride on Avenue S.
RD - Who was there? Sue - Stacey, Nick and Brendon. We stayed a fewminutes. RD - Why only a few minutes? Sue - Stacey was being loaded into the ambulance so we went to the ER. RD - Did you leave the hospital and go to the Palmdale Sheriff station? Sue - Yeah, that was morning March 19.
 
RD - Any law enforcement contact you? Sue - No, we spent several hours at the Sheriff's station and then went home. At some point Detectives Nava and McCarthy and told us they had found Emma. We had a half hour conversation with them. RD - Did they ask for any suggestions of potential suspects? Sue - Yes. Do you think Brendon Borrelli  could be a suspect? Nava asked that, and do we think Brendon and Stacey could have conspired to get rid of Emma?
 
Sue - On March 20, LE took us ( Gary and Sue) to the Sheriff's station because they needed to question us. I sat in the lobby until Detective Nava joined me and said she wanted to speak to me alone. We only had 3 conversations in all.  RD - Were you recorded? Sue - I didn't know we were recorded.

Sue - On March 20, LE took us ( Gary and Sue) to the Sheriff's station because they needed to question us. I sat in the lobby until Detective Nava joined me and said she wanted to speak to me alone. We only had 3 conversations in all. RD - Were you recorded? Sue - I didn't know we were being recorded. RD - During that conversation did Detective Nava tell you something? Sue - Yes, she said pink fibers were found in Emma's throat. RD - How did that make you feel? Sue - I was devastated. RD - Did you know that Det. Nava was lying and no fibers were found? Sue - No. RD - Is that why you were mad at Stacey? Sue - Yes, after a half hour conversation Stacey went to live at Larry Barker's home. ( Gary's Dad ) RD - That was an interrogation technique. Detective Nava didn't have fibers. Sue - No, I didn't know. RD - How did Nava know the blanket was pink? Sue - I don't know. RD - You didn't know she was lying at that time?Sue - No.


RD - What do you know about a drinking game? Was there drinking going on during the mourning period?

Sue - Yes. RD - Was there a party? Sue - Not a party the night before but people were coming in and out.

RD - When you had dinner were all of Nick's friends there? Sue - Yes, that's when we played beer pong.

JZ - Can you explain what beer pong is? Sue - Beer cups are set up on a ping pong table like bowling pins, each person bounces a ping pong ball trying to get it in a cup, those who make it drink the beer. RD - Did Stacey play? Sue - Stacey only played 45 minutes, at my request. I was trying to cheer her up. She was quiet the whole time.

RD - How did you feel when you found out Detective Nava lied to you? Sue - Mad. JZ - Strike that, that's for the jury to decide what is the truth. RD - How they dealt with grief. (WTH, this is what we meant about questions jumping around.)

Cross Done - Re-direct Starts

KC - Why did you only visit Stacey once at Linwood? Sue - I was hurt. KC - Why, Did you think Stacey killed Emma? Sue - I did, yes. KC - So, when after 3/19 did you have a lot to drink? Had you drank alot when you were interviewed by Detective Nava? Sue - No, after. KC - Did you tell Detective Nava you knew Stacey was guilty and say I want you to prove it? Sue - Yes.

KC - You said you didn't go to the doctor with Stacey when she was pregnant? Sue - Yes, I didn't go with her. KC - But Anthony did go to the Stacey's doctor appointments when she was pregnant? Sue - Yes

KC - I thought he had no interest in being a dad? Sue - I don't know.

KC - When did Stacey start dating again after Emma's birth? Sue - 3 months, she had 2 or 3 boyfriends before she met Brendon.

KC - Did Stacey have any significant injuries when growing up? Sue - One. She hurt her shoulder in gymnastic, but she didn't cry.

KC - So you drank daily before Emma died? Sue - uuhh....yeah. KC - What? Sue - Shots of Jose Quervo, 4 to 5 shots in the evening a couple days a week. KC - How much do you weigh? Sue - 195 lbs.

KC - Do you know Colleen B.? (Colleen is Anthony's mom.) Sue - I met her after Emma's birth.

KC - How long ? Sue - 4 or 5 months. KC - Her daughter? Sue - One time, only.KC - Defense exhibit H, the baby food book, Is this is the book that Stacey used? Are you sure ?
Sue - Yes. KC - This book doesn't look as though it's been opened much, pages stick together. Sue - I don't know, but she did use it. KC - Hmmm...nothing spilled on it, no pages pressed down, doesn't seem to want to open to any one area...like it's been used. Sue - I don't know. KC - Huh (Not said as a question but rather an opinion aka mild equivalent of BS.)

The pictures I will post here are not what are part of the defense exhibit but may be close in age to the ones the jury are seeing.KC - The photos, defense exhibit A-G, what ages are they? Sue - (went through pictures) This is 3 months, this is Stacey with Emma at 3 months, this is 3 months, this is Emma newborn. KC - She looks awfully good for newborn? Sue - C- section, picture C is between 3 and 6 months. D is Thanksgiving, uhh...about 2 1/2 months. JZ - Who cooked it? Sue - I did. Emma had a bib that said 1st Thanksgiving. 

Judge Zackey is such a nice guy, but this is Kelly's direct and she has a job to do, sooo.....

KC - You said when you and Stacy were fighting on March 18, she was screaming "I CAN'T MAKE ANYONE HAPPY!" What did she say? Sue - I can't make anyone happy, work, you.... Emma's never happy and I can't make my boyfriend happy!

KC - You made several statements to detectives, each statement to Detective Nava was after she had died, had Emma had an Autopsy yet? Sue - No. KC - What were you told? Sue -Not for 3 weeks. KC - So the day you spoke to Nava, you knew Emma didn't have an autopsy. Sue -No. KC - The 1st day you talked with Nava, the autopsy wasn't done, and you made the statement that Stacey killed Emma, you knew no autopsy, no fibers. When you said Brendon might have helped was before the pink fibers were mentioned or you should have known Nava was lying.

(Tori notes here that Kelly Cromer is on fire today!)

KC - Did Stacey ever shed a tear for Emma? Sue - No. KC - Remorse or regrets? Sue - No.

KC - Why was Stacey going to Long Beach? You told Nava she had plenty of money. Did you say you thought she killed Emma in Palmdale and was going to Long beach to pin it on Anthony? Sue - Yes. KC - How many times had Stacey taken Emma to Long Beach? Sue - None. KC - Stacey herself to Long beach? Sue - When she was pregnant she spent a weekend with Anthony in Long Beach.

KC - What was the one major injury that Stacey had growing up? Sue - she dislocated her shoulder during gymnastics. KC - She didn't cry? Sue - No, but had to heal, it took a couple weeks to heal.

KC - Defense exhibit I, is the Target receipt. You said this was new clothes, how do you know they are new? Sue - I saw them, tags still on them. KC - What are ears? Sue - I don't know. KC -I thought you saw the stuff, what was it? Sue - 2 shorts, 2 shirts, sandals and tennies. KC - The receipt time is 5:10 pm from Target in Lancaster.

(Tori noted that takes at least 15 minutes to go from that Target to Barkers and Sue had to leave at 5:30.....either the times don't add up or someone else was watching Emma.)

Re cross examination

RD - She had this blender book. Tori notes as Dager holds the book he is flipping through the pages and bending the binding. Sue - yes, she used it. RD - I JUST DONT LIKE MISS CROMER SAYING THERE WAS NO FLOUR....RD is standing right behind Kelly Cromer as he screamed this. KC - Objection! Personal Attack...and screaming in my ears! JZ - Mr. Dager.... RD - Just because there isn't any flour or food on this doesn't mean it wasn't used! As Dager said this he was manipulating the book and threw it down on his table and picked up a few times to the extent our friends thought he might be trying to age that book a little...just saying. Re-cross done. Brendon Borrelli is told to stand by before re-direct.

JZ - Want to ask more? (asks KC) KC - no, but I'm thinking. JZ - You can have her recalled. KC - My next witness won't be short so I want to change the witness order. JZ - OK.

Detective John Hoyt is called to the stand. Hoyt says he is employed with the LA County Sheriff Department assault and crime unit. He is dressed in a uniform.

Direct examination - Detective John Hoyt

KC - Did you go to the crime scene? What did you see? Hoyt - A silver Mazda parked with all 4 doors open. Both front seats were in a reclining position....reclined all the way back. KC - Did anyone move them? Hoyt - Protocol doesn't allow moving anything. KC - What is this? Hoyt - An adults brown sandal and a child's tennis shoe with a red and white bottom.

KC - Did you stay with the car? Hoyt - No, I went to the hospital to talk to SB.I asked her what happened and she didn't know but thought she was knocked out at the city park. (Lancaster) KC - What did she say to you? Hoyt - Her eye hurt, the back of her head and her ribs hurt. KC - Did she ask about the baby? Hoyt - No KC - What did you notice about her? Hoyt - Clean feet, hands and fingernails. KC - In this informal interview not once asked about Emma. (More of a statement than a question.) Direct exam finished.

Cross examination - Detective John Hoyt

RD - If you are a detective, why are you wearing a Sheriff's deputy uniform? Hoyt - With budget cuts we dress for the street. RD - Did you stay with the car? Hoyt - No. RD - Did you touch the car? Hoyt - No

RD - When did you get called? Hoyt - About 11:40 pm. RD - What were you doing when called? Hoyt - Trying to sleep. RD - Got there about Midnight? Who was there? Hoyt - The Crime Scene Unit was there. RD - How do you know no one else touched the car? Hoyt - That's not protocol, so I doubt it.

Cross Examination was finished and the day is over. JZ - instructed the jury to be in the jury room by 10:30 am tomorrow and he will try to have them up here by 10:45. ( Day 3, tomorrow is, Friday, April 29)

There is a detail that I hadn't mentioned yet. On the first day of trial Tori had noted an attractive young woman with short (pixie cut) with blond over black hair, that she didn't know, speaking with one of Stacey Barker's grandfathers. After speaking with him for a few moments she moved away to her own seat and took notes. We discussed her that night and concluded she may be a cousin or friend.
Today the same young woman was in court but this time she had a woman with her. After a few moments Tori realized the woman with her was Anthony's mother. Later on a break Tori and the young woman spoke and we learn the young woman is Susan, Anthony's sister and the other woman is indeed Anthony's mother, Colleen B.


Susan asked Tori...are you guys the bloggers? Tori, replied , yes...I suppose you hate us too. (It seems as though Stacey Barker's family blame every vile thing that has been said about Stacey out on the web on us.) Susan said, no...we love you guys, extended family and friends are able to follow the case through our blogging. Susan and Colleen did ask us not to use their last names and we agreed. Tori assured them we have been following this case for Emma and are here for Emma .

The reason I bring up Colleen and Susan at all is because "reportedly" Gary Barker pointed Colleen out to Dager who said he has been trying to contact her. Dager wants Colleen added to the witness list and tells Judge Zackey that. Kelly Cromer said she would like to talk to her as well. Evidently, Kelly added Colleen to the state's witness list because she will be the first witness on the stand tomorrow for day 3.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
2
katfish

Sorry, I'm short on time....I will come back later and post the pictures mentioned in the article.

0
fdgsdfgsdf

Welcome to----------------- www.agiobase.com ----------------------------------All kinds of world brand shoes,jeans,t-shirts,bikini,beach pants,handbags,wallets,sunglasses,belt,caps,watches etc..---------------have some cheap things ...------------------------------------------------ free shipping!If you think our website is good,you can put this website to collect bookmarks or other places, easy to find ...

2
tori a

Thanks Kat

We all have lives so we know how it is....

I had the pleasure of meeting Anthony's Aunt's today, come to find out CB (his mom) and I are the same age... her and her two sisters M and T are the nicest ladies, Kat, you would bond with them in an instant the way you are!!! I commented to them that they are the girls I would have partied with in the mid 70's...they look just like my buddies....so we have things in common..yeah girls!

I felt that connection to them the second I met them and they did not look at me like an intruder on their families life and sorrow...they welcomed me with a hug and handshake....

Today was boring pic's of the car and testimony from Det Marsh (yes kat it is Marsh), Crime scene Investigators and saw some of her clothing she tore off of herself.

Monday is at 1:30 again, JZ will let us know about Tue, I have the feeling that X will be here sometime on Wed at the latest... the state is almost finished....time for AB, GB, JG and who ever RD has in line for his wit's.

ttya soon...T

 

 

 

2
mariober

I enjoyed, thank you

Y8 | Friv | Friv 2 | Friv games | Friv 4 school  | friv 4 Friv.com



3
tori a

You are welcome Mariober...

As I had said yesterday, it was boring pictures and RD made it clear with his objection of something like "repetition" I think that is what he was saying..toooo many pictures of the same thing, I agree!

There are 4 interesting pictures that stand out to me, 1 is of the soft loose dirt that is just above the curb at the PNR leading to the fence of where she had thrown her Clothes, ATM Cards and Check book (at least that is what I think it was) over..this pic shows the dirt is disturbed, the next photo shows that the dirt has been dragged from above the curb to below the curb, it is in a line to the front bumper of the car...(my thoughts, if SB had stepped in that dirt and she had flat open toed sandals on wouldn't HER feet have had dirt on them? her SART photos show very clean feet, someone help her by throwing the stuff there)....the 3rd Photo shows the dirt in the front passenger floorboard of her car consistent with the dirt by the fence (this is the seat they found her in when LE got there) and the 4th photo I thought was Interesting was a photo of a lime green and white box in her car that said "PLAN B" on it (the morning after pill) the last picture was the box close up, we could not see if it was empty or a pill was inside.

This Plan B pill box is Interesting to me because RD keeps trying to get in that SB had some medical problems that might have prevented her from ever having children...Emma was a miracle baby, so I want to know if they ever told her she was NOW able to have children after Emma's birth?  I hope that she is NEVER able to have another child as long as she lives, that sounds cruel but she had a chance to raise a beautiful child and she thought it was more Important at this stage in her life to have a social life! aaaarrgggghhh!

I wanted to add a statement from yesterday that Det. Marsh had said but RD had objected and asked to be stricken, it was stricken....

KC asks Det.Marsh when did you first have contact with SB? he said when he went to the Sylmar site. Where was she? she was seated in the back seat of an unmarked sheriff car with the window rolled down. What did you do then? I told her who I was and that I was sorry for her loss. What did she say to you? Nothing, no reaction, she just looked out the window, she seemed unconcerned! I bring this up because, she has no emotion at what she is watching, the people removing her child's lifeless body out of the bushes and doing all kinds of Exams, measurements, removing clothes and so forth AND SHE DOES NOT EVEN CRY!

This would have been the ultimate pain for me, even knowing my child was not alive, all the prodding and touching of my child by strangers seems so intrusive to me, I couldn't have even thought about watching this go on, much less seeing it without bawling my eyes out! 

Emma, the child that she so loved, her miracle child, her life...and not a tear? Aaaahhhh, really!

Ok, when I would see something being done to one of my children as babies in the hospital, X rays, shots, blood draws, stitches and anything that made them look at me like "Mommy help me" I cried and had to ask one of my Sisters or my Mom or who ever was with me at the time, to come in and take over for me because I could not help them, Lord knows I wanted to take them out of there....but they needed what was being done, done! (Ange was a klutz as a child so it was more her then the rest...lol)....

Monday trial starts at 1:30pm and I will let you know who is on the stand...T

KC had asked NB if he had ever heard of a Narcissistic personality while he was on the stand..

I looked it up and here is what it says: Narcissistic traits

Thomas suggests that narcissists typically display most, sometimes all, of the following traits:

•An obvious self-focus in interpersonal exchanges
•Problems in sustaining satisfying relationships
•A lack of psychological awareness
•Difficulty with empathy
•Problems distinguishing the self from others
•Hypersensitivity to any sleights or imagined insults
•Vulnerability to shame rather than guilt
•Haughty body language
•Flattery towards people who admire and affirm him or her
•Detesting those who do not admire him or her
•Using other people without considering the cost to them of his or her doing so
•Pretending to be more important than he or she is
•Bragging (subtly but persistently) and exaggerating his or her achievements
•Claiming to be an "expert" at most things
•Inability to view the world from the perspective of other people
•Denial of remorse or guilt for actions.
I never knew her personally but I see some of these traits in her as we have seen her over the last 2 years, does this one trait "Problems distinguishing the self from others" have anything to do with her "changing herself for the men in her life"

Was KC thinking SB was in a narcissistic rage at the time?

Types of narcissistic rage

Narcissistic rage occurs on a continuum from instances of aloofness, and expression of mild irritation or annoyance, to serious outbursts, including violent attacks and murder. Narcissistic rage reactions are not limited to personality disorders and may be also seen in catatonic, paranoid delusion and depressive episodes.

That is something to think about when trying to figure out why she acts the way she does,  if she has this personality disorder would that excuse the fact that she killed her child (in the eyes of the Law or the Jury)?

3
LCoastMom

Hey Tori! 

Det Marsh told her he was sorry for her loss?! Det Marsh I'm so sorry you had to see her up close and were probably aware that the officers working the case took it much more personally than she did!

Can you all imagine having to sit through seeing your baby's lifeless body being examined? I cannot. On the other hand, they could not have gotten me away from the scene with a crowbar.  T you have me bawling my eyes out here just thinking about this. Poor sweet Emma. 

Those crime scene photos of the PnR sound interesting. Any shoe prints in that dirt? I wonder if LE had the chance to look at any other feet / shoes that night or if because they were looking for a missing baby, someone caught a lucky break? Hmmmm...

A personality disorder (Borderline, Narcissistic etc) is not a mental illness, it is not an excuse when someone commits a crime (in the eyes of the law).  The reason they are so difficult to treat is because the person with the disorder has to want to change and since they usually feel superior to all us minions they aren't motivated to make any changes (or admit that there is anything wrong with them). 

Psychosis, someone hearing voices that said to "send their children to God to save them" or a psychotic split is different in some states. 

IMO SB is a psycho beotch - that's not a medical diagnoses. It's a state of mind. You know the type that will smile at you, then stab you in the back or take your last dollar after you just gave them a nice meal and a place to stay!    


2
tori a

LC,

I know it was heart wrenching.....I wish I hadn't looked but that is what this is all about, the horror of what this twit did and the end result.

Yeah, I doubt it was her footprints her feet would have been dirty, it was loose dirt.

I don't know the part about the Plan B pill, if she is on BC and the guy is using protection why the PLAN B?

I think she wanted to be double sure she could not get preggers...if it was up to me she would never get pregnant again!!!

Yes Det. Marsh was nice about things even after he was told who did it. He is on the stand today, I will let ya all know who is up tomorrow.

Kat, are you and Jack OK? call me when you get a chance.

LC got the Emma gift THANK YOU....could you do me a favor and get another for Anthonys Mom I am sure she would love one.

I am off to court now so talk to you all later.  T

2
katfish

Hi Tori and all,

For some reason NP has not been notifying me by e-mail when I have comments or private messages. When I talked to Tori last night she mentioned some things being said here and I didn't have a clue.

Tori knows but for anyone else interested....Jack is doing pretty well....I have had my hands full with my mom....if it's not one thing it's another. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad I'm in the position to assist my family but their timing sucks! I have been following 3 cases very closely the last 2 to 3 years, of the 3, two are in trial and the other is supposed start next month. In the later the defendant just requested and was approved to represent himself... so a lot has been going on in that case too. ~ sigh ~

I'm so grateful to Tori for keeping us up to speed on this case. {{{HUGS}}}

0
LCoastMom

Thinking of you! 

1
jenny from the block

My thought is that it is evident by all the comments that Ms. Barker canot get a fair trial in this hillbilly town.  Dont get me wrong I love this hillbilly town and have raised five wonderful children.  However this young lady is on trial for murder and people are convicting her without knowing all the specifics.  And while I am at it... I believe the cops and detectives in this town are corrupt.  Maybe not all of them but a big percentage.  Please keep an open mind people. 

3
MonaSuzy

Jenny if you have specifics we haven't heard tell us. Everything I have read tells me she is guilty as sin.

3
LCoastMom

Jenny we are not the jury and we have been following this case since 3/19/2009 - reading documents and attending hearings. Many of the potential jurors had never heard of Stacey Barker, so despite Mr Roberto Dager saying otherwise - she is getting a fair trial by a jury of her peers, in her hometown. 

Believe me unless someone is about to pull a trial ambush - we are very aware of the facts that I HOPE will convict SB of murder! If I'm proved wrong about the facts as I know them, I will gladly apologize to her. Once found guilty, do you think she'll apologize to everyone she has hurt?

I hope if you have inside knowledge you have shared it with the Court - as much as I want to see her convicted, I want her to have a fair trial so when she is (hopefully) sentenced to 25 to LIFE she has no recourse through an appeal.

2
katfish

jenny from the block,

My thought after reading your comment:

1) Many of the people commenting here are not from anywhere near your so called "hillbilly"      town. Personally, I'm in the Midwest. The jurors called for this case are from LA County, not just your "little town." Barker probably has a better chance at an impartial jury than most just because LA  County is such a large county.

2) All defendants are given the presumption of innocence in the court of law and all jurors take an oath to hold that presumption until that presumption is out weighed by the evidence.

(I personally couldn't be a juror on this case even if I lived in LA County because I have formed an opinion. I know for a fact Stacey Barker is guilty of at least one her charges and believe she is guilty of the others....she failed to provide medical aide to her daughter and dumped her daughter's body. Regardless of the little kiss on Emma's forehead before she walked away and started the cover up, her actions and her lack of action is child abuse. SB can consider herself fortunate not to be facing other charges...such as lying to LE)

3) You don't give any basis for saying that a large percentage of cops and detectives are corrupt. Do you have personal experience to base this judgement or know some corrupt cops?

4) You are correct, some of us have formed an opinion about Stacey Barker but you make an assumption as to what we know about the case.

I do agree wholeheartedly with one thing that you said, "Please keep an open mind people." It's a good thing to have an open mind, but in this case many of us are beyond that point, we have learned enough to form a judgement. Granted, many of the things we have learned about SB and this case may not come in at trial, but then we are not Ms. Barker's jury. In other words our opinions are no threat to her case.

 

3
Challange Questions

I agree MonaSuzy, just what are all the specifics that do not incriminate Ms. Barker? Are you up to that challenge of providing any useful specifics?

3
tori a

Hi All,

Jenny thanks for stopping by and giving your thoughts on this but I have to say you are WRONG....

First this town is not a HILLBILLY town, it hasn't been for the last 20 some odd years unless of course you live out in the Lake LA, Antelope Acres or Rosamond area, then you can call them a Hillbilly or Meth head city.

2) It is clear to me that you have never attended even one hearing to say that you know of any Evidence that screams Innocent! because nothing that has been shown in any of this TRIAL has said that...just the oppisite!

3) Only people that have had run ins with the Sheriff out here would know if they are Corrupt as you say....I have not had to deal with the Sheriff to know this as fact, seems like you do!

4) I have attended ALL but 1 hearing in the last 2 years for this twit.....I have heard from both sides, I have had to SEE a beautiful childs face in death a number of times something I never want to see again anywhere!

5) Good thing I'm not on that Jury because from all that I have heard, I do think she is GUILTY, It was no accident, the Coroner even said there is no way she died from a baggie in her mouth...a blanket smothered her...NOPE, she had patterned lines on her CHEEKS from fabric, dried blood in and around her nose and a spot on her upper lip...a nose bleed from pressure applied to her nose and mouth....

The Binky she so loved may have gotten blood on it from the Nose bleed and that is why it cannot be found! that may be what she threw out the window and not the BAGGIE... how could SB give the Binkey to her Mother to put in the casket with Emma with blood on it????

Jenny, you have every right to stick up for her (you must think Casey Anthony is Innocent too) but I know what I see and hear at the trial and it is 99 % more then the local papers report, so everything we write on this site is what has already been said in open court except our own opinions of the case, I do not make anything up, I go on what is shown and said, I go on her attitude and lack of tears for her child!

If you would like to go to the court and Invest some of your time to hear what is really going on, it is in AV Court, 4TH floor, room A-17. I think we will be there until at least the start of next week, for the rest of this week they will start at 11am and end at 4 or 4:30pm....

 

3
tori a

Hi Girls,

Det. Del Hauer (not sure if one word or 2) a Expert in crime reconstruction was on the stand.

He is a very well Spoken, Educated, Experianced and Detailed...he has a Impressive backround in MANY areas...

He showed Photos of Det.Nava reaching back to put her hand over a dummys mouth and the way SB said she did it, from the front seat and she could not even touch the face, Nava and SB have a 1' difference in the arm length (Nava's longer)...

He discussed Cell phone records, gave his view on how she smothered Emma with one hand behind her head and one on her face.

He handed RD his ass on more then one occation. I think he did a good job...

There is more to this then I can write down here but when something comes out in court after another investigation is finished I will let it be known.

Det. Nava is on the stand today and I am getting ready for court now so I will be back later! T

3
Challange Questions

Jenny,Your comment about keeping an open mind should apply to you. Take your blinders off and let the FACTS sink in. Well said Tori a. Have you heard or read any facts that show Ms. Barker to be innocent! That's a good idea about Jenny going to court and listening to some of the FACTS about Ms. Barker. Then again, Jenny would say they are all corrupt and lying about what really happened.

3
Kab25

Anything about NB or BB helping her with her story or the attempt at covering it up?

3
LCoastMom

Nick has been cleared of any involvement in Emma's death and / or the cover up (from what I understand).

3
tori a

Hi All,

well, KC is hinting towards her having help....but not from NB.....

Jenny on the block would have changed her mind if she had been in court today!

They Played the audio recording of her first Interview filled with emotion about what happened to HER...only asked or said something about Emma when led to a discussion about Emma maybe being cold and scared somewhere and how they had 100 people looking for her, that is when she said yeah she might be scared and cold I need my baby....ok..

Now they play the Audio and Video of the second Interview and the Video shows her with a sad face when the Det's are begging her to tell them what happened to Emma and they know that sometimes Accidents happen and that if that did happen she would not be thought of as a bad person, Please help us bring Emma home, you want her, your Mom wants her and we want her home she continues to say that she didn't know where she is and she didn't do anything to Emma, SHE SWEARS! The Det leave the room and this whole different persona comes out, she looks bored, tired and annoyed, she is picking at her forehead (pimple) running her fingers down and throught the length of her hair, picking her nose (often) drinking water and doing the hair thing again this time she is looking at her ends to see if there are any split ends.

She looks like she thinks these people are Idiots and she is fooling them, this part of the tape of her alone is 5 to 7 mins long...no crying at all! the Det's come back in as she hears the door opening she starts with the sad face again....ooooohhhhhhhh pissed me off... this happens again like 15 min later, same thing she is different when the Det's are gone....RD objects that they are showing tooooo long of the time alone she has...Over Ruled...

JZ has seen this Video for the first time ever, he tells the Jury to go on break and when they left he said "I want it on record why I over ruled RD for excessive content....It goes to show her demeaner, she seems to be aloof and busy checking out her split ends, she does this for the whole 5 to 7 min's"

She does think she is quite the actress....but she is not fooling anyone, I remember thinking when I heard about this Video Interview way back in the prelim that she may have had a "Tude" but this is worse then I ever thought it would be, it looked like she was not one bit interested in being there, she looked Irratated (sp), she did not say just hurry up and find my child, nothing about Emma until asked...just arragant....this may have shown the Jury who she really is, a heartless snake....I hope it did!

I told my daughter how she was acting on tape with the face picking, nose picking and the hair thing also resting her head in her hands as if trying to think...my daughter said she sounded like she was on one!!

When they come back in she tells them it was a Accident in Long Beach that Emma took the baggie and choked on it and when she looked back she was not breathing....she pulled over and checked her breathing and she is not breathing and she has no heart beat so she starts back to AV and stopped in Sylmar and dropped her off there in the lot....no emotion while telling this story...

LE calls in Homicide Det's Mc Carthy and Nava, so we hear half of the tape today and it's the same story of the baggie....tomorrow is the other half of the tape and Nava will be on the stand because this ran to long.....tomorrow will be the part where she tells them that she put her hand over her nose and mouth and how Emma struggled pulling at her arms until her hands fell limp at her sides and she knew EMMA WAS DEAD!

I will talk to you all later or tomorrow...

LC thank you for the Pin's everyone loved them....

Oh and anyone interested Judge Z said his trial may be dark on Friday (no trial), he will let us know tomorrow, and still no mention of X but they did say that State could wrap up their case as soon as Thursday! then it is Dagers turn.....T

2
LCoastMom

Great recap T! I don't know how you are able to control yourself - that tape sounds a lot like KC Anthony from the lies, to the grooming. Except KC liked to flirt with the detectives too. Blech I'll bet they needed showers to wash away all the bad vibes and pure evil when they were done! (speaking of KC, her jury selection started yesterday!) 

Oh, I forgot to point out to Jenny that SB confessed to "accidentally" holding her hand over Emma's mouth and nose - on tape. Not to mention that she lead LASD to Emma's little body - dumped on the side of the road in three feet of weeds like so much garbage. How does one do that accidentally, anyway? 

T thanks for handing out the pins for me. I wore mine today too (well most of the day it sat in the dressing room locker) but I had it on when I could and I'll wear it for the duration.

You go Judge Z, we love that you see this the way we do, with the law on your side!  Demeanor, indeed! Heartless, cold and calculating. Since I assume Gary Barker has been sitting in the hall, I hope he will read the transcript when this is over - he needs to see exactly what his princess has done - with his own eyes! I wonder if they will play the tapes for him after trial? 

I always thought SB's mug shot looks just like the pictures you can see on the Faces of Meth web site. Do you know if they did a drug screen at the ER on 3/18? Not that it matters in regards to what she has done...   

2
hotinlancaster

Someone needs to watch Ms Borrelli. I know for a fact that before Brendon went on stand she was in court listening as and she was relaying details about what was going on to him, and giving him details of what was going on in the court room on more than several occassions. I think both Brendon and his mother know more about what happened than meets the eye! And its a joke to them that they think they are pulling the wool over the judges head. Really someone needs to watch and observe her, and him at all the time they are in court for the rest of the trial.

2
tori a

Hot,

He is not allowed back in court because he is being recalled so he can not sit in on testimony of other wits, he tried yesterday.

We did hear in court that someone had tipped Det Nava's Office that someone was telling stuff to witnesses in the hall but they thought it was Sue Barker...Det. Nava found out it was Mrs. M Borrelli later.

His Mom and Grandmother (I think) stayed in court after he was finished testifing, they saw more of SB then I think they wanted too.....In magna vision no less....

I hear that Mrs. Borrelli is very upset with BB for having gotten himself in this mess with SB, from what someone tells me MB does not like SB and never has...I don't know that for a fact but that is from someone that knows BB personally...

I think she was Pissed that SB was screwing the Sheriff under BB'S nose at the same time she was sleeping with BB...If I was his Mom I would have ripped him a new one on how she was using him and how she was a tramp and how she involved him in this mess....I am sure she did..LOL

I don't think she knows anything about what happened, to tell you the truth, she found out just like we did..

I think he is worried that SB is going to somehow blame him for what happened to Emma, she has tried every other way to get out of this, I wouldn't put it past her...he needs to watch out and start telling everything he knows about that night and hope they buy what he has to say so she can't blame him for anything...I would worry if I were him it is not sounding good for him so far...

He lied on the stand saying she had 1/2 a beer and he had 1 1/2 beer that night, yet one of her Text messages to a friend that day she was on her way to LB said "LOL exausted, hungover called in sick today, had fun" how did she get a hangover after 1/2 beer? I know they caught this.....

She said on the Video today that she went home at 2am, he said he took her home at 4am....

We are waiting for him to come back on the stand to see what KC has in store for his next round of Questions...

Thanks for the Info Hot...

 

2
tori a

Oh I forgot to say that she, MB has not been back to court since...no one new has shown up in the audiance either, except for today and it was a older lady (holding a Bible) with a young girl, they talked to the Grandparents and watched the Video...we don't know who they are but I don't think they are connected to the Borrelli's...

2
LCoastMom

Hey there T it just took me almost an hour to write the above post - still a little woozy I guess. I love it when we are both here writing at the same time! Glad you saw the post from Hot, prolly would have taken me another hour to respond!

Hmmm maybe Ms Jenny took your advice and showed up! Good day for it!

3
tori a

LC

Nurse me and Ange wore our pins in court.....

Naaah I doubt that was Jenny on the block, if it was good she saw first hand the truth of this Momster.

How did it go today? are you feeling better? ttyl T

2
ANurse

Ladies!

Please check out a post from "SS-8 (not verified).... Under SB murder trial day one... the post that shows a picture of the palmdale courthouse...

4
A7XMommy

Much as I tried to stay away, this was about as long as I could do it. Emma has been on my mind soooo much since I was last on this site. And as disturbing and heart-wrenching as many of these details are, it just doesn't feel right to me not knowing what is going on. I haven't been able to read through everything yet. Tomorrow is my last mid-term exam, so I will come back after all of that and finish reading. I did read your posts on the other page, LC and T and thank you guys for your kind words. ((Missed you guys! Hugs to all--be back tomorrow))

~Nik

 

1
katfish

A7XMommy,

Glad to see you. This case should be over soon, hopefully SB will be forgotten soon but I hopewe will always remember "our" little girl Emma. 

I haven't been around much myself but I do try to keep up through T. Hope your mid-term went well. (((HUGS)))

 

2
tori a

AAAAWWW Nik,

We Missed you too... {{{{Big Hugs}}}}

This has been exausting and sad for all of us, it's much worse then I ever thought it would be.

Your caring about Emma is amazing, I see you can't rest until SB gets what is coming to her and that's why you can't rest yet... you dear are a special person...you are going to make a great Nurse....

Good luck on the Mid term...get em girl! much luv T

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

LCoastMom
First Flagged at 11:51 AM, May 6, 2011 by LCoastMom
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (5)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from