Tories kill arts grants for foreign travel

by kate | August 10, 2008 at 10:19 am
1791 views | 58 Recommendations | 24 comments

Photos

Tories kill arts grants for foreign travel

Tories kill arts grants for foreign travel

see larger image

uploaded by Barry Artiste


I just heard about this from MIchael Alstad, and am so outraged. There are really only two travel funds for artists in Canada, and this is one of them, and it has just been pulled by the Tory government for ideological reasons. They are arguing that the funding program has been used to promote the work and travel of "a left-wing and anti-globalization think-tank" and "a general radical", among others who "would raise the eyebrows of any typical Canadian".

I don't think it is acceptable to pull funding for a travel program on this basis. The role of art is to raise questions, sometimes difficult ones, and to articulate alternate perspectives. Art should raise eyebrows. This is clearly an ideological stance, and is about controlling the movement of people connected to certain ideas. Plus, the vast majority of groups historically supported by this program don't fall into this category, anyway.

The companion article in the National Post, titled "Ending PromArt's Gravy Train", anticipating the "stink" about this that will be raised by artists, arguing censorship, writes "If Canadian artists produce world-class art, then it will be noticed on the world stage -- with or without government assistance."

I'm not going to argue censorship on this one, or at least not only. My question here is: Do they think art just "happens"?

Art is an industry. Art needs structures, agencies and supports, like any other industry. The argument that it should just find its way out of the country on its own, and that if it doesn't, it is somehow below par, is mind-bogglingly naive.

Think about all the funding that is provided for Canadians to travel abroad on various missions related to business development. Of what value is this? Well, it builds relationships, makes it possible for deals to happen, exposes people to new ideas, creates marketplaces. This is all fine, apparently, when it is happening for industries that fall under the umbrella of "business". But when it falls under the "arts and culture" umbrella, somehow it is unnecessary.

They need to re-think this one. I just hope they do it before Canada becomes a pathetic cultureless backwater.

The federal government will cancel a program today that sent artists abroad to promote Canadian culture because the program's grant recipients included "a general radical," "a left-wing and anti-globalization think-tank" and a rock band that uses an expletive as part of its name.

The Conservatives are cancelling the $4.7-million PromArt program administered by the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade because most of the money "went to groups that would raise the eyebrows of any typical Canadian," said a government official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Heritage
Heritage
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 10:41 on August 10th, 2008

kate, I like this story. It's good stuff.

I just hope they do it before Canada becomes a pathetic cultureless backwater.

My condolences. Australia has been taking such actions for several years. With the new Rudd administration things are looking up. These things a cyclical. Don't give up hope.

Jordan Yerman
Jordan Yerman
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:04 on August 10th, 2008

In the US, we saw the National Endowment for the Arts wither to its deathbed. If that's Canada's artistic future, then I'm truly sorry. The proponents of this move have clearly never tried to make anything "world-class".

Rob Peters
Rob Peters
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:20 on August 10th, 2008

You make a lot of good points. I'm often saddened by the degree to which art is marginalized in Canada, and how it's never a priority to monetize quality creative work. You're right, art doesn't just magically appear.

mchawk
mchawk
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:56 on August 10th, 2008

kate, I like this story. It's good stuff.


I'm guessing that Canada sorely needs these these art-emissaries as I'm blissfully unaware of  what's currently going on in the Canadian art-scene.

For all my opinions on modern art (often a low opinion) I'm glad it's still there and I'm glad that British artists can get their works out into the world.  For a government to undermine its countries artists is so short-sighted that it's an insult to its people.

Why is it that art is so politicised?  The Right complain that the Left allow art to become depraved, the Left complain that the Right wouldn't know 'good art' if it tripped over it.  It's an unwinnable argument that just goes around and around every time a new party comes to power.

A pointless argument that puts artists out of work and leaves a country culturally impoverished.

mtippett
mtippett
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:20 on August 10th, 2008

Another move destined to move Canada one step closer to cultural obscurity.   I guess there is always indigenous art to appropriate when we don't have any of our own.

0
PEP

Hey Mike, native art has been stolen for generations now.

0
Sudha Krishna

What is troubling is the Tories singled out 3 "radicals" as their reason for the axe. Avi Lewis the TV host, Naomi Klein the writer, and an indie rock band. One can argue whether the above needed financing or not but that is NO reason to axe the whole thing. What is dismaying is the Tories bring slanted politics into everything, thereby undermining all semblance of independence in our government agencies.

0
Barry Artiste

Yeah, well if they (Musicians and artists0 feel their stuff is so hip and groovy, perhaps they should let their music literary works, films, etc speak for itself. If no one listens, perhaps they should go back to flipping burgers.

Barry Artiste
Barry Artiste
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:04 on August 10th, 2008

kate, I like this story. It's good stuff. Kate, I flagged this story, to let you know, what some may not have told you about waste in the arts community, not all of them, but certainly a large percentage, who enjoy Chablis and Travel on our dime.

As for Canadian Culture? Well, Ya know many may not agree with me and that is fine, as for Canadian Culture, well granted it is rapidly not slowly eroding, and not just in the arts, it is everyday Canadian life as we know it.

Most here know I frequently comment on this very same subject, sometimes to no avail, with nary a response from fellow Canadians, but I get a whackload of comments, good stuff flags and ongoing dialog from Europeans, Middle Easterners, Americans, Latin America, and East Asia and Austrailia.

They all say the same thing, why are we letting our Canadian culture slide, my answer to them is if we talk of Canadian Culture, it is not politically correct, as we are a fabric of multicultural diversity with all the colours of the rainbow, a melee or Yadda, Yadda, Yadda......

Let's face it people, We let it get this way in our quest to be The Bestest Canadians on the Planet, a model for the World to follow, but when we ask them, Aren’t we as Canadians special, their response is polite, but all I get from them are pretty much the same, We would never let our culture go, as that is what defines us as a people.

Well Canada, ya got's no one to blame but yourself, and that includes the arts. Remember I used to work for CCRA, I know auditing and I know and see waste.

Our friends here who are commenting, granted see only one aspect of this story, the reason I joined and write for Now Public as a Opinion Contributor, is I always like to have a balance to any story, providing the pros and the cons, as media rarely tell both.

For example I will provide Facts, as most of you know me, that is what I do as an forensic investigator, oh yes, and I have done art and antiquities as well, including the Art Gallery when it was on Elgin Street in Ottawa, before they moved it to Sussex street.

I could provide so many examples of waste, just not in art, but theatre, literature, dance, music it would turn your head and make you vomit.

Now remember everyone Arts Grants are to showcase "Canadian Talent", that's what Canadians want, they are paying for Canadian Culture, so Now Public Readers should know this before continuing reading the following, and know this money is taxpayers money.

I will also post in this story the accompanying photos of each fact and or News media report I provide here, so readers will know, I am not just babbling here.

In 2001, I was in Moscow, Russia, when our Illustrious Prime Minister and his wife and a cadre of politicians, glitterati of the artsy set, literary types, and businessmen all on a fact finding mission, supposedly on a world “Showcasing Canadian Business and getting Business contacts, Canadian Culture, yadda, yadda, yadda, it was also during the Olympic bid between Russia and China.

Elton John was playing Red Square, as was Pavoratti, the Bolshoi Ballet was in full swing, the best performers at the Bolshoi were on tour.

Guaranteed it was well attended “Money no Object” as was every other venue which Moscow had to offer. Did I happen to mention this entire entourage was spending a few weeks on the Canadian Taxpayers Dime?

Average hotel room per day for the lowliest public servants was around $400.00 a night, with the majority of Canadian Attendees getting them $1200.00 a night rooms.

Meals on average were around $500.00 a day, though drinks were not included as was snacks, theatre performances etc.,Etc, ETC….. Want to guess what that jaunt for a battalion of hanger oners was?

And that was just Moscow, I hazard to guess what it cost the rest of the tour through Europe? Let’s say for one lowly person, it most likely would have put a med student through med school, that’s for Moscow alone.

Hence, it will be a cold day in hell before I ever vote Liberal or NDP, cause like Mulroney, once said, “There’s No Whore, Like an Old Whore~!!! And the Liberals and NDP can Whore it better than anyone when the Canadian Taxpayer is picking up the tab.

Michael Alstad’s Blog below, is certainly not art, but perhaps what our Conservative Prime Minister is talking about, why pay people to travel and discuss non art subjects?

His environmentalism is nice, certainly is indepth reporting on Chickens is news breaking, but I don’t see a degree in environmental or agricultural sciences behind his name, so what is the deal?

http://shanebrennan.net/climate/category/michael-alstad/

Gwynne Dyer a British resident, HMMMMMM, why are we paying him to go to Cuba to discuss Politics, last time I checked, he has no diplomat training or even political science training or degree in Political science? Again, I refer you to re read the No whore like an old whore statement!

 Below is a story from the National Post, which will give readers another side of this story.

http://www.nationalpost.com/related/links/story.html?id=710676

Ending PromArt's gravy train

National Post Published: Saturday, August 09, 2008

The majority of the grants awarded under the federal government's $4.7-million PromArt program -- which was cut by the Conservatives on Friday -- were tiny and uncontroversial:

$1,000 to an independent filmmaker to show his short documentary at a European film festival;

$750 to a novelist to read excerpts from her book at a store in New York City;

$2,000 to help an Aboriginal artist transport some of his works to an exhibition in New Zealand.

Most of the awards wouldn't raise the eyebrow of the average Canadian.

But some would absolutely curl their hair. Why, for instance, is it the duty of Canadian taxpayers to fly left-wing anti-war journalist Gwynne Dyer -- who is a resident of Britain-- to Cuba to hobnob with that country's opinion leaders and give them a "greater awareness and appreciation of Canadian foreign policy, values and models"?

Camilla Gibb, the novelist -- who, like Mr. Dyer, lives in London -- was given $10,000 last year "to travel to the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia to participate in public diplomacy activities in support of Canada's dialogue with Muslim communities." Again: Why? Barbara Willis Sweete of Rhombus Media received $2,000 from the program to allow her "to present her production Five Days in September -- The Rebirth of an Orchestra at the 2006 Sydney Film Festival in Australia." That seems OK.

But why should ordinary working Canadians give former CBC activist Avi Lewis, who now has brought his anti-American schtick to al Jazeera, $5,000 to attend film festivals in Australia and Argentina?

Why should they underwrite his jet-setting travels when they are having trouble saving up a few hundred dollars for a summer camping vacation of their own?

Alexander Mair was given $4,200 "to participate in seminars in Helsinki, Finland and Trondheim, Norway on cultural exportation in the sound recording industry." If he wants to fly thousands of miles to hear a Finnish academic drone on about business models for alternative rock bands, so be it.

But PromArt paid for several other Canadians to attend the same seminars, then added several thousand more dollars to subsidize the conference itself.

Many of the recipients weren't even Canadian and had very little connection to Canada. A group called Peru 2021, for instance, received nearly $30,000 from Canadian taxpayers "to organize a one-day conference on corporate social responsibility," while nearly $44,000 was doled out to the Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development And Transparency to "host a two-day conference on Pakistan's national Elections in 2007 and possible political scenarios for the region.

" Among the biggest beneficiaries of PromArt is the Toronto International Film Festival, which last year was given nearly $150,000 to bring out-of-country film buyers to T. O. and wine and dine them while they were there.

Predictably, there will be plenty of stink over the cancellation of the tax-funded slush fund. Some artists will claim it is censorship -- as they did when the Conservatives recently tightened the government's film-subsidy rules.

And cultural nationalists will charge that the move cripples Canadian artists' ability to have their voices heard outside our borders.

(Blogger Paul Wells of Maclean's magazine, for instance, claims the program's cancellation is a sign the Tories believe "Canada has nothing to tell the world.")

http://www.nationalpost.com/related/links/story.html?id=630364

Indie 5,000: glut of pics, lack of hits Doom looms for art-house cinema

Andrew O'Hehir, Salon Published: Friday, July 04, 2008

All winter and spring, people in the independent-film business have beenmurmuringpolitely behind their hands and pretending not to see the 800-pound walrus in the corner of the room.

The indie industry is undergoing a sudden and largely unexpected meltdown, or in the business-speak recently employed by Sony Pictures Classics co-president Tom Bernard, "a periodic market adjustment."

Here is just a smattering, why grants are being cut, I will start with the following: ·

Voice of Fire, "$2 million dollars" paid to a Non Canadian but a American Artist Barnett Newman in which we paid the absurd sum of close to $2 million dollars.

The Public took a Sh*t fit, for us purchasing a canvas from an American, no less an American Artist, who most likely was on acid when he painted this two blue stripes on either side of a big red stripe, that a mentally deficient monkey could paint with a roller and some house paint.

Certainly a bad return on investment, that if the money was used wisely, we could have bought back some native art, or art from local artists.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice_of_Fire

Then on to the ludicrious

  The Banana “$2,500.00” someone actually thinks this is art, thank god the taxpayer didn’t pay for it.

People walk past a banana installation exhibit by Michael Fernandes at the Gallery Page And Strange on Granville St. in Halifax, NS on Wednesday, July 2nd. (Sandor Fizli for The Globe and Mail)

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080702.wbanana03/BNStory/Entertainment/

I do thank you for the opportunity to comment on your story Kate, in closing, I hope you and your readers now have a balanced perspective on why these cuts were made.

The Arts are meant for Canadians, by Canadians and to focus on the Arts, not political statements, non sensical babbling about chickens, or why Chavez likes Monet, etc, Etc, ETC…

Gotta remember it is my money too, and I want it spent on what it is supposed to be spent, Canadian Culture, which is fast becoming extinct, as the funding they are whining about.

If artists think what they have to say, do, draw, write, play and dance is so Sh*t Hot, then why are they relying on Taxpayers for a living?

Their work should speak for itself, if it is so groundbreaking and nouveau, otherwise, they should bury it, like the Hanging MEAT DRESS the Canadian Are Gallery bought!  That was a putrid maggot infested stinker, but some artist thought it was art and the taxpayers paid for it. talk about buyers remorse on that Abortion.  Which brings me to another work of art........>we paid for!



Barry Artiste.

0
art person

I was just waiting for some idiot to mention Voice of Fire. If you know anything about art AT ALL, you'd just go ahead and be happy they bought a Barnet Newman. Barry, I'm sorry, but it is really clear that you don't know anything at all about art. You go ahead and make judgments about the forensics industry, and let people in the art community discuss and make judgments about art.  Thanks!

0
Barry Artiste

Guess you missed the point there Sherlock, the grants are for Canadian Art, but then you probably loved the Rotting Meat Dress.

I have no problem about letting people in the art community discuss and make judgments about art, just make sure you know it is my dime you're spending!  Certainly lost on most who feel the Canadian Taxpayer is an endless trough in which you can shovel your snout into.

0
Artfag

Why is there the assumption that good art will somehow be supported by the market at all stages of its development?  This doesn't even really happen in business.  There are government incentives for companies when the start, grands to help them grow and bail outs when they get big and go through a downturn.  Sometimes things are worth supporting.  Sometimes things of value are worth creating BEFORE the market recognizes it.  It's called investment (buy low, sell high).  We pay for our roads to be paved, we pay for cops, we pay for schools.  Why not invest in art too? 

0
Barry Artiste


Granted but Canadian art should trump, we could get back all the group of seven, England has a bunch of our first nations art, the list is endless to purchase our National treasures from foreign countries, Canadian Ballet, our Orchestra's, we have literary works to showcase after all the BUZZWORD is Art Grants showcasing Canadian culture, not Cuban, American, or European. Artsy fartsy's going to Cuba to talk politics or talk about chickens and methane, isn't art, it isn't even science, it's a waste of taxpayer money.  Sorry all, but the title of this story is losing Canadian Culture and Identity, you tell me what value these artsy wonks contribute to Canadian Culture globe trotting off to foreign lands to play some artsy music, that in real live wouldn't get air play or a free concert.  There is a reason that when they say, "Not sold in stores" and Limited TIme offer, cause if you don't buy it real quick, they'll be back on the street with a guitar case on the ground hustling for spare change.  I think most here did not even to bother to read the links I provided from the National Post, preferring to only see on side and read just the story posted on here.  I sure as hell hope you do not go through life that way, taking a single story for gospel without checking out all the facts, cause that's a shame, and that is one reason why we are in the predicament we are currently in. Gotta take off the blinders people, again the story is about Canadian culture and art, show me where these so called artists provided that in Cuba or elsewhere.  When we end up with zero culture, then you can sit back and whine, cause you let it happen, by not insisting those who live off our tax dollars do what they are required to do and that is promote Canada, not just yourself, unless you are willing to pay for it yourself.

PEP
PEP
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:19 on August 10th, 2008

kate, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
art person

Barry, I feel the same way about the police. I'm happy to let you make judgments about that field, just make sure you know it is my dime you are spending! I should point out that most artists are not supported by the state, where all police are.


0
Barry Artiste

Me no police, me work burger king, making hats

Paschen
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:43 on August 10th, 2008

kate, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
respectfully

it appears this post has been hijacked by Mr Barry Artiste with a comment longer than the original post, Sir although I accept your right to post whatever comment you like, I believe out of courtesy to the poster, kate, you could have posted a shorter comment with a link to your own post on this topic.

0
Barry Artiste


Well Brave Sir Robin, though not all can be as valiant as yourself in rescuing Now Public Damsels, clearly not in any Distress, your tales of self imposed gallantry, regaling us all with a Brave Question no one asked, speaks volumes of your  Codpiece of Prose and  Wisdom, perhaps if Kate asked me to shorten it or delete my comments, I would certainly comply, for you see Sir Respectfully, Kate, owns this story, and unlike yourself, I would never take it upon myself to impose on behalf of another authour, let alone tell another commentator on what you perceive Kate's thoughts to be.   You are kind to point out yourself in your musings about my comments on this post, in which a continued dialog has developed from others, especially when I take a contrary opinion on the matter.  Your commentary about little tirade, has gained a response to Kate's story in part, versus your recent comment, I would think will elicit nary a response, let alone a continued dialog amongst amongst the other commentators here.  So Brave Sir Robin, I beg thee to sheath your mighty sword of heroic commentary, and prance, little pony prance to whence you came, back to Anonymous Land, where your gallant opinion clearly matters not to me, for only Kate's will suffice.

I do thank you for pointing all this out for all of us!



tiha zaman
tiha zaman
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 19:22 on August 10th, 2008

kate, I like this story. What a shame if we make it a political issue out of this, but art without politics in the modern time is like Michelangelo without his belief. Complex relationship which may or may not bring out the best in an artist. :)

ppeggy
ppeggy
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:47 on August 11th, 2008

kate, I like this story. It's good stuff.  If I could flag it twice, I would. Good one Kate.

0
julianw

Gwynne Dyer today denied the Tory government's accusations.


Author and journalist Gwynne Dyer, who became a poster boy for wasteful federal spending when the Tories axed a program to send arts and culture abroad, says he travelled at the government's request and never applied for the grant he got.

Mr. Dyer was labelled a "left-wing" writer with plenty of money in a leaked Conservative Party memo that identified several recipients of PromArt grants, which help pay for artists' travel, as "not exactly the foot that most Canadians would want to see put forward." Mr. Dyer travelled to Cuba in 2007 to speak about democracy. The memo was leaked on Friday.

Mr. Dyer told The Globe and Mail that a Foreign Affairs official at the Canadian embassy in Cuba called him and asked him to speak in Havana, promising to cover his travel expenses. He said he was given $3,000 in cash to cover his airfare, hotel and expenses in Cuba, and that he had never heard of PromArt until last week.

"It suggests to me this is the gang who can't shoot straight. My surmise ... is that they didn't have a pot of money that they could easily fit this into, so a little creative bookkeeping was done ... and you take it out of the PromArt budget," he said.

0
ibrahim abu touq

nice , , , keep it up

0
m. alstad

for those interested there is facebook group to save promart:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2250902584&ref=ts#/group.php?gid=27449691026&ref=mf


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from