In U.S., shift to conservatism does not mean revolution

by smkovalinsky | October 28, 2009 at 05:39 am
51 views | 6 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

In U.S.,  shift to conservatism does not mean revolution  | Photo 02

In U.S., shift to conservatism does not mean revolution | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by smkovalinsky

New Political winds blowing do not add up to a revolution in ideology or anything which will alter events:  

Recent polls showed a shift to conservatism in the American public.  Of course,  conservatives are proudly touting the numbers,  convinced that their own ideology has taken strong root, and that political winds are shifting in our nation.  

I myself,  however,  find myself in agreement with this OpEd columnist from the Washington Post:  In the end,  this means not  a whole lot.  

If I were a conservative, I would probably tout the newGallup study showing that conservatives now outnumber moderates, as Bill Kristol did in his column on Tuesday. But I’d be wary of making too much of what is a rather small shift in the ideological self-description of Americans. And out of curiosity, I checked around with other pollsters to see what they were finding. The results were mixed.

First, those Gallup numbers: Forty percent of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 36 percent as moderate, and 20 percent as liberal. “This marks a shift from 2005 through 2008, when moderates were tied with conservatives as the most prevalent group,” Gallup reported of its study based on combining16 surveys for a sample of 16,321. 

The shift from 2008 is hardly startling. Conservatives were up three points from 2008, moderates down one and liberals down two. On the other hand, the country was ever so slightly less conservative in the most recent third quarter of the year than it was in the second quarter: According to Gallup, the conservatives’ advantage over moderates went from 6 points in the second quarter to 3 points in the recent quarter. It’s not exactly clear which way the trend is running.

Of course these are all small shifts, and that’s the point: We are not going through some ideological revolution.

recommend Add a comment
1
Roy C

Idiot pundits don't get the revolt against the elites because they are elites, and they don't have a clue, further, about why Lasch's book is called The Revolt of the Elites and why we, the Tea Party people and others, are in revolt.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Roy C
First Flagged at 7:25 AM, Oct 28, 2009 by Roy C
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (6)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from