NP Rank:
'Vancouverism' lauded at London architecture festival
What in the sam hill is Vancouverism, you're asking.
Vancouver's city planning philosophy is such a hit with architects they've come up with a new name for it. Apparently we're good at building a dense city that spreads the wealth of high-altitude views.
The 2008 London Festival of Architecture will showcase the visionary Vancouverism of prominent architects like Arthur Erickson and Bing Thom.
While we're at it, consider this a call to NowPublic's Vancouverites to submit photos of your favourite city architecture. Or, if you prefer, what are the buildings you'd like to blow up?
London is to get a dose of Vancouverism as an exhibition dedicated to the B.C. city's unique architecture opens at the Festival of Architecture on Tuesday.
Vancouverism — West Coast Architecture and City Building celebrates the work of Arthur Erickson, the Canadian architect known for his modernist structures, and his accolytes.
Vancouverism describes the practice of designing higher, thinner towers to provide so-called "view corridors" while still accommodating as large a population as possible.
Erickson first sketched out the idea more than half a century ago, says architecture critic and curator Trevor Boddy.
"Arthur with his chutzpah, as an ambitious architecture prof at [University of British Columbia], did this amazing design for the Community Arts Council," Boddy told CBC News.
"It was called Project 56. This sketch showed a 50-, 60-, 70-storey soaring downtown and West End Vancouver. It was a sketch literally a half-century ahead of itself. In my view, that sketch by Arthur Erickson invents the idea of Vancouverism."
The 2008 London Festival of Architecture is a month-long festival focusing attention on buildings and streetscapes, and featuring work by architects such as Daniel Liebskind, Cesar Pelli and Rem Koolhaus.
The Vancouverism exhibition is scheduled for Paris this fall, and then will be shown in other parts of Europe and Asia. It could return to Vancouver for the Olympics in January and February 2010.
Over the past 18 months, I have heard American architects and city planners use a new word when they promote the notion of a high-residential density, high-public amenity central city. They call it “Vancouverism.” Our city has also become a verb, and the coinage of our recent urbanism is now in wide international circulation, from local developers “Vancouverizing” Dallas and San Diego to the bizarre simulation of our town in Dubai’s “Very False Creek.”
Canada’s largest city never generated “Torontism.” Not during the media-stroking of the mayor Crombie-era “City that works,” not in the 1990s, when the colonial notion of the “World Class” caught out Torontonians misinterpreting Peter Ustinov’s put-down—“New York run by the Swiss”—as a compliment. There will never be “Torontism” because that city is not a one-liner, but a place that does many things, some of them very well.
Vancouver does one thing well: We build condos higher and denser than any other spot on the continent, and our global reputation is currently being set by these acts. Because of our downtown peninsula’s love affair with tall, thin towers on townhouse bases, Vancouverism is replacing Manhattanism as the maximum power setting of contemporary city building. By some analyses, the average number of people living per hectare in our central core is now higher than that of the famous island in the Hudson.
Crowd Power
-
chispita_666
Seattle, Washington, United States -
Always_be_closing
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada -
Breeonne
Vancouver, Canada -
sissonenphoto
Canada -
fonseka
Canada -
pnoeric
West Hollywood, California, United States -
Alastair Moore
Canada -
azzurrolou
Canada -
allan mack
Canada -
JadeRider
Houston, Texas, United States -
the_ineffable_mr_f
Canada -
tripleman
Canada















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 11:02 on June 24th, 2008
I'd like to blow up Buchanan Tower and put a clone of the Chan Center in its place.
at 14:54 on June 24th, 2008
So let's just wait before we celebrate too much... Vancouverism has created high density, relatively anonymous high priced condos... leaving the city centre devoid of affordable housing and without incentive for developers to provide new commercial space. There is a high density and low density solution, without an affordable mixed use medium density zone - so if a large single family home is beyond your budget and a one-bedroom apartment won't work for you, you're out of luck. This forces young families and middle wage earners out of the city and into the far suburbs. If you think about it we potentially have a reverse traffic flow where people live in the city and commute (parkade to parking lot) to equally anonymous industrial parks in suburbs like Richmond (don't fear though Richmond, you're getting your own towers). Which isn't very "green" at all.
Every successful, culturally vibrant (and socially inclusive) city is based on a medium density, mixed use model. Vancouver, I'll admit, is pretty to look at for the most part, and some nice things have been done (the waterfront, view corridors, throw in a bike path or two) but dig a little deeper and you'll find much to be ware of.
The Vancouverism of today misses much of the Erickson elegance which was essentially built on a model of public institutions (schools, law courts, galleries)... it's getting harder and harder to find those programs in the shadows and reflections of the green glass of skinny towers.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Rob Petersat 15:03 on June 24th, 2008
Good points. Vancouver has a real need for mid to low-end housing. I also think the city could be much more bike-friendly, particularly downtown and across crowded bridges like Burrard. The only truly bike-friendly paths are along the perimeter of the city.
at 17:49 on June 24th, 2008
Rob Peters, I like this story. It's good stuff.
I just moved here about a year ago and the design of the city core really appealed to me. It's too bad the same philosophy hasn't been carried into the suburbs.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
triplemanat 18:47 on June 27th, 2008
A shot looking over Davie street, downtown and north including the new Shangri-La whcich is the new tallest building in Vancouver.
tripleman has contributed a photo to this story.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous (not verified)at 08:50 on July 10th, 2008
Vancouver has the worst building designs of any modern city. All new buildings are constructed from just three materials: concrete, steel and glass. Each building looks the same - no matter its actual function. This is what happens when we have greed as the first priority of the development companies and a weak City Hall.