Wall-E angers fat pride groups

by Amy Judd | July 12, 2008 at 02:26 pm
1178 views | 7 Recommendations | 5 comments

Videos

Wall-E: Funniest Scene From The Movie

see larger video

sourced by Amy Judd

Wall-E: Funniest Scene From The Movie

I just saw 'Wall-E' last week and I absolutely loved it. I liked how it provided such a commentary on consumer culture and what could be the fate of our planet if we continue down the same road.

But for the same reasons I loved it - many people hated it.

But one group is not amused - the swelling ranks of fat pride groups, who believe the film propagates anti-obesity hysteria comparable with the quest for the perfect body by the eugenics movement in Nazi Germany.

The backlash has become a cause celebre for a growth industry in the United States, where pro-flab "fat-tivists" are campaigning for human rights for the full of figure.

As the WALL-E controversy hit the headlines, the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance (Naafa) was last week holding its annual convention in Los Angeles, a celebration of so-called "flabulous figures", seminars on fat discrimination, a fat fashion show, podgy pool parties and entertainment from weighty singing group The Fatimas.

Fighters for fat rights are calling for legislation to ban weight discrimination in the workplace, denouncing airlines that demand they buy two seats and car manufacturers whose seat belts are too small.

They are also battling doctors who won't treat patients who refuse to lose weight and companies that won't insure them.

They seek to reclaim the word "fat", dismissing terms like "overweight" and "obese" as morally loaded.

Research published in April by Yale University's Rudd Centre for Food Policy and Obesity suggests they might have a point. It found that one in eight people now complain of weight discrimination, up from one in 14 a decade ago. The report compared the impact on victims compares with racism and sexism.

The anti WALL-E crusade began on the internet. Rachel Richardson of the Coalition of Fat Rights Activists (Cofra), used her blog, "The F-Word", to object that the film "singles out and targets obese people as the primary cause of mankind's demise."


Aparently some of the test audiences for the movie thought the same way:

Among the issues that these test audiences have supposedly cited are “WALL-E” ’s depressing settings (i.e. The first act of this film is set on Earth 700 years from now, where — thanks to humanity’s wasteful ways — our planet is now basically one big trash heap floating in space) as well as the picture’s depiction of people (i.e. In the future, mankind has grown so slothful that everyone weighs 500 pounds and has lost the ability to walk on their own. Which is why we all make use of these devices that look like floating barcaloungers).

The blog 'The F Word.org' weighs in on the issue too:

But WALL-E specifically singles out and targets obese people as the primary cause of mankind’s demise, further perpetuating the stereotype of the gluttonous, slothful fat person. Furthermore, the film suggests that, in their exaggerated laziness, obese people disregard not only personal health, but also that of the planets, and are held up as the cause for the destruction of the environmental landscape.

This is, despite mountains of evidence that show, as a group, fat people do not eat more than thin people, nor are they less active and that the so-called “obesity epidemic” has been greatly exaggerated by self-serving corporate interests. For more information on this, see any number of authors on the subject, including Gina Kolata, Paul Campos, or J. Eric Oliver, or Michael Gard and Jan Wright, or Glenn Gaesser, or Marilyn Wann, or Laura Fraser.


I found it to be more of a warning about what could happen, not what is going to happen.
What do you think?


Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
mchawk
mchawk
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:08 on July 12th, 2008

This is my 4th attempt at writing this comment - I can barely contain my incredulity.


Surely the obesity of the people in Wall-E is a caricature of consumerism - a comment on obesity levels rising in the 'First World' while people still starve in the 'Third'.

Being proud to be morbidly obese, makes as much sense as a heavy smoker being proud of their emphysema - and I'm using that analogy as a smoker, who could lose a few pounds.

I'm not trying to judge anyone with any condition that makes their life different to a perceived 'norm', but there are certain times when you should stand up for you human rights and some times you should just go enjoy a Pixar film.


Great post - BTW. (I can't wait 'til Wall-E gets released in the UK!)

0
Amy Judd

I completely agree with your analogy - I think 'pc-ness' may have gone too far with this one!

0
Kell Brigan

Where is your proof that fatness is voluntary? That fatness can be changed? That fat people eat more differently than thinner people? That fatness is not primarily genetic. All people who've tried to do all these things FAIL. ALL OF THE TIME. Where's your proof? There's a list of resources driectly above your head. Why should I believe you, sans any proof whatsoever, instead of the New England Journal of Medicine, Leeds University, the University of MN, etc. etc. etc. etc.? Looks to me like you're just shooting your mouth off. Fatness has NOTHING in common with smoking, even though you wish it did. Your wishes don't change the truth. FATNESS IS PRIMARILY GENETIC. FAT PEOPLE ARE NOT LAZY AND ARE NOT GLUTTONS. MOST FAT PEOPLE LIVE AS LONG AND AS HEALTHFULLY AS THINNER OR AVERAGE-SIZE PEOPLE, AND THE HEALTHIEST PEOPLE ARE THOSE CURRENTLY LABELLED "OVERWEIGHT". GET EDUCATED OR SHUT UP.

lisam3
lisam3
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:43 on July 12th, 2008

amyjudd, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Hugh Askew

well, it appears the 12 year old's are having fun!

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from