NP Rank:
Warner Music pulls videos from YouTube
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Warner Music Group ordered YouTube on Saturday to remove all music videos by its artists from the popular online video-sharing site after contract negotiations broke down.
YouTube has over 100 million viewers in the US alone.
The music companies typically get paid a share of any advertising revenue associated with the video and a per-play payment for every video viewed. The per-play fee is usually a fraction of a penny and with millions visiting YouTube everyday it was all expected to add up to a substantial amount.
YouTube executives have spent most of 2008 stepping up efforts to develop revenue streams on the site partly in a bid to keep content partners happy. It has been in long negotiations with Warner on how best to split revenues until things came to a head in talks on Friday.
We work with the music industry worldwide -- with major and independent labels and publishers, rights collecting societies, and with artists and songwriters directly -- to build user-friendly licensing arrangements. With these partners and our cutting-edge Content ID technology, we've created a win-win situation the likes of which never existed before YouTube: a system that gives artists a brand new revenue source and a great way to connect with their fans.
That said, despite our constant efforts, it isn't always possible to maintain these innovative agreements. Sometimes, if we can't reach acceptable business terms, we must part ways with successful partners. For example, you may notice videos that contain music owned by Warner Music Group being blocked from the site.
The demands could leave YouTube in a difficult position as it tries to balance the need to pay partners, including TV and movie companies, and also generate enough return on their investment needed to keep streaming millions of videos around the world.
Crowd Power
-
Esparta
Ciudad de Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico -
CiaoChessa
New York, New York, United States -
Ben Heine
Brussels, Belgium -
rpshen
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Mary Richard
Toronto, Canada -
Phanix
Santa Cruz, California, United States -
doyejoseph008
United States -
Torley
United States -
millermz
United States -
Karmafritz
Netherlands -
CustomYouTubePage
Los Angeles, California, United States -
rex_letoutou
France -
mediacloisters
United States -
davidlaplante
United States -
SC963
Hyderabad-- Deccan, A P ,, India -
apfelmus
Vienna, Vienna, Austria -
Urban Magnate
United States -
emmaobanye
United Kingdom
Recommendations (47)
-
Dave Keating
London, United Kingdom -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
rpshen
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 
Anonymous users (2)
-
SC963
Hyderabad-- Deccan, A P ,, India -
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
mudricky
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom














Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Dave Keatingat 06:53 on December 22nd, 2008
Really unbelievable. A music video is essentially a commercial to promote a song. Why wouldn't the record company want the free advertising??
- Sign In or Join to post comments
rex_letoutouat 18:01 on December 23rd, 2008
rex_letoutou has contributed a photo to this story.
at 15:40 on January 15th, 2009
Its all about money.