What "Leftist" Means in America Today

by NotPhil | October 12, 2007 at 10:30 am
278 views | 2 Recommendations | 1 comment
O'Reilly has aptly highlighted here the new ideological divide in our political culture -- one is now on the "Left," usually the "Far Left," if one supports what were previously the defining attributes of basic American liberties ...

Fortunately, there is widespread recognition of the dangers about which O'Reilly warns. As our Congress works heroically to make permanent the vast new warrantless eavesdropping powers it vested in the President two months ago and to protect the corporations which allowed warrantless surveillance in violation of the Leftist doctrine called "law," it is clearly understood in the Beltway that only the fringe Leftists -- the shrill partisan "activists" -- actually subscribe to this radical new agenda of "warrants," as well as the accompanying extremist doctrines such as the "rule of law"; "lawyers" for those we imprison permanently; and prohibitions on freezing people and keeping them cold and naked and chained to the floor.

So for now, the Republic is safe from this Far Leftist agenda, thanks to the joint efforts of our media elite and responsible Congressional sheperds. But vigilance is always required. ...

It is also vital to note that Far Leftists have not only long crusaded for radical liberties such as "warrants" and "due process" but have also spouted the same dangerous foreign policy views now common among today's anti-war radicals, those Far Leftists trying to impede ongoing war with Iraq and a new glorious war with Iran. This dirty America-hating dovish radical [George Washington], for instance, railed like an unhinged maniac -- with amazing specificity -- against exactly the same actions which the Irresponsible Far Leftists of today condemn. ...

Literally, what was once an unquestioned hallmark of the American form of government ... is now, in our Serious Beltway discourse, a fringe, Far Leftist view of shrill, obstructionist partisans.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
gryphon
gryphon
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:18 on October 12th, 2007

NotPhil, I like this story. It's good stuff.


Unfortunately I think the will be the case for a while still.  And perhaps it is not unhealthy to have a fierce opposition group when another fiercely supported group is in power.  Thus 'check and balances' comes into play.  It will be interesting to see how all this plays out in the next Pres. election. 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from