is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
It is obvious to the point of cliche that Clinton is in a trickier position in many ways than Obama: when he is emotional, he is persuasive; when she is emotional, she is betraying her feminist roots. So just as Obama can cut a dash in his slimline, clearly style-conscious suits, Clinton has to hide herself in garishly coloured squares going under the name of "jackets", or else risk being dismissed as so vain that she would be too busy putting on her lipstick to respond to an international terror threat.
When Clinton complained in a debate just before the March 4 primaries that she "always" got the tougher time from the press, there was another clue to her personal style. It is as if Clinton - incredibly, given what her husband went through - seems to be under the impression that the media is always fair. So last year, when there was a bit of a hoo-ha in the US press about Clinton showing some cleavage, instead of dismissing it as the load of misogynistic nonsense it was, she seems to have taken this to heart and buried herself ever since in shapeless, defeminised, frequently yellow (yellow!) suits.
Of course a woman shouldn't be denied the presidency just because she can't dress well, but that is not the point with Clinton - she has always carefully tailored her style to what she thinks the electorate desires. Just look back at photographs from when Bill was elected and Hillary was wearing pleated skirts and alice bands, looking very much like a Sloane circa 1984. In short, she is doing what she thinks she should as opposed to having a splinter of courage and being true to herself. Which kinda makes you wonder what sort of leader she would be.
Edmund Jenks
Los Angeles, California, United States
shawnduffy
Upper Marlboro, Maryland, United States
Taekwonweirdo
Chicago, Illinois, United States
gonadsgo
Austin, Texas, United States
Studio512
Austin, Texas, United States
goaheadanduseit
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Sarah.Ferguson
New York, New York, United States
stanley_f2nd
Salinas, California, United States
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 12:35 on March 17th, 2008
This makes me think of that West Wing episode where I think the POTUS was consulted on choice of neck-ties for a State of the Union address.
Quoting from that Guardian piece: "In short, she is doing what she thinks she should as opposed to having
a splinter of courage and being true to herself. Which kinda makes you
wonder what sort of leader she would be." This bit from the article sounds like the author just ran out of steam.
Male politicians likely spend as much time cultivating their own public image through dress and speech. Do they think by their choice of a single-breasted vs. double-breasted suit or navy-striped vs. salmon-pink tie they are "being true" to themselves?
at 13:04 on March 17th, 2008
Rob Peters, I like this story.
I have always wondered why anyone would like to take off after a style made popular by Elvis Presley!
See additional photos and Elvis Video (Suspicious Minds - Hawaii 1973) here>>
http://maxine-log.blogspot.com/2008/01/uh-huh-hillary-wears-elvis-collar-to.html
at 16:08 on March 17th, 2008
That Guardian piece also made me think again about the issue of authenticity in public figures. This inflexible notion of public figures being "true" to themselves or "authentic" seems to me an unrealistic and outdated notion. In his work, The Fall of Public Man, Richard Sennett wrote about the need to formalize our "public" interactions in order to reinvigorate civic life . Why can't public figures/politicians cultivate a certain "public dress or self"?
at 10:00 on March 18th, 2008
I personally believe that she dresses quite respectably. She's not an object, and shouldn't be treated as such.
It was wonderful seeing her speak.
Studio512 has contributed a photo to this story.