CUPE Boss Asked to Settle with Secretary
Paul Moist, President of CUPE National, sent a letter to striking Vancouver civic workers on July 23, 2007 in which he stated:
“In short, we want fairness and to date this has not materialized….”
With the language Moist was using, he could have been a secretary.
For years, a former secretary to two CUPE Presidents in Vancouver has been saying all she wants is “fairness” in her grievance against CUPE. In Dec. 2002, CUPE called police on this secretary after she exposed the fact that for years, CUPE had been operating what she alleged was a "non-union sweatshop" inside Local 116. Vancouver Police Constables M. Herrmann and K. Ng – who did not even have jurisdiction at Local 116; the RCMP did – visited her apartment and left voice mail instructing her that CUPE wanted her to silence herself about unfair labor practices. She believes CUPE was attempting to intimidate her, to weaken her resolve.
“CUPE members across Canada applaud your solidarity and your resolve.”
Paul Moist, in his letter to members
The secretary has written to Paul Moist, President of CUPE National, in Ottawa to ask that he settle her case. She would like Moist to reverse what she alleges was CUPE's "hypocritical stance" in the case, that stance being that writing to labor leaders about unfair labour practices is “evidence” of criminal activity. She would like him to have CUPE lawyers remove from the police Property Office the letter she sent to CUPE National in 2002 about unfair labour practices inside Local 116, as well as the one she addressed specifically to Barry O’Neill at CUPE BC, and the one she addressed to Jim Sinclair of the BC Federation of Labor. This is one of many issues, the secretary has been asking CUPE over the years to deal with in a fair way.
“There are many issues . . .and these must be dealt with in a fair way….”
Paul Moist, in his letter to CUPE members
To read the complete original story,or to read last week's stories on the secretary's case, go to Downtown Eastside Enquirer blog