NP Rank:
CUPE Boss Asked to Settle with Secretary
Paul Moist, President of CUPE National, sent a letter to striking Vancouver civic workers on July 23, 2007 in which he stated:
“In short, we want fairness and to date this has not materialized….”
With the language Moist was using, he could have been a secretary.
For years, a former secretary to two CUPE Presidents in Vancouver has been saying all she wants is “fairness” in her grievance against CUPE. In Dec. 2002, CUPE called police on this secretary after she exposed the fact that for years, CUPE had been operating what she alleged was a "non-union sweatshop" inside Local 116. Vancouver Police Constables M. Herrmann and K. Ng – who did not even have jurisdiction at Local 116; the RCMP did – visited her apartment and left voice mail instructing her that CUPE wanted her to silence herself about unfair labor practices. She believes CUPE was attempting to intimidate her, to weaken her resolve.
“CUPE members across Canada applaud your solidarity and your resolve.”
Paul Moist, in his letter to members
The secretary has written to Paul Moist, President of CUPE National, in Ottawa to ask that he settle her case. She would like Moist to reverse what she alleges was CUPE's "hypocritical stance" in the case, that stance being that writing to labor leaders about unfair labour practices is “evidence” of criminal activity. She would like him to have CUPE lawyers remove from the police Property Office the letter she sent to CUPE National in 2002 about unfair labour practices inside Local 116, as well as the one she addressed specifically to Barry O’Neill at CUPE BC, and the one she addressed to Jim Sinclair of the BC Federation of Labor. This is one of many issues, the secretary has been asking CUPE over the years to deal with in a fair way.
“There are many issues . . .and these must be dealt with in a fair way….”
Paul Moist, in his letter to CUPE members
To read the complete original story,or to read last week's stories on the secretary's case, go to Downtown Eastside Enquirer blog


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 13:02 on August 10th, 2007
JR - interesting. Do you want to reveal the identity of this secretary so that this can be crowd-corroborated?
at 13:40 on August 10th, 2007
I believe I included the initials of this secretary as well as the initials of her fired co-workers in past articles. The secretary feels CUPE damaged her reputation by calling police on her and that publishing her name in relation to the police report would only continue what CUPE started. She wants CUPE to take responsibility for the defamation.
I do have a copy of the police report dated Dec. 17/02. I can give you the police file number if you want. And I have a copy of the letters that CUPE turned over to police as evidence. Also I have a copy of a freedom of information request to the VPD that, when compared to the police report she had obtained earlier, reveals that the "offence" for which she had been investigated was mysteriously changed a year after the case was "CLOSED".