De Palma Wins with Shock and Awe

by BigT | September 8, 2007 at 03:39 pm
450 views | 2 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

De Palma Wins with Shock and Awe

De Palma Wins with Shock and Awe

see larger image

uploaded by BigT

Brian de Palma won an award for his movie Redacted. This movie shows in graphic detail how American soldiers rape and murder Iraqis without any thought about it. The soldiers, the director wants you to know, aren't bad people but are pushed to this by the illegal war that Bush has thrust us into to.


The gall of this guy is beyond the pail. With stories like the ones New Republic recently published that proved to be falsified here comes another fictionalized account of the war and its toll on our troops.

Like the director says, the point of this movie is to get us out of war. That is a mighty easy thing to say while you are jet setting around the world getting awards for your movies while Iraqis have to worry about every move they make while doing the simplest tasks. Maybe its just me though.

Veteran US director Brian De Palma won the Best Director award at the Venice film festival on Saturday for "Redacted," his hard-hitting Iraq war film.

The dramatisation of the rape and murder of an Iraqi girl by US soldiers, was also honoured on Friday with the Future Film Festival Digital Award, for the film that makes the best use of animation or visual effects.

De Palma, who is best known for such violent fictions as the psychic thriller "Carrie" and the gangster movie "Scarface" (1983), turns 67 on Tuesday.

The film exposing the ugly reality of the Iraq war seared the big screen at the Venice film festival Friday, with director Brian De Palma saying he hoped it would help end America's military occupation.

"The pictures are what will stop the war," De Palma told a news conference after the showing of the movie.

"Redacted," which is based on the actual March 2006 rape and murder of a 14-year-old Iraqi schoolgirl by US soldiers who also slaughtered her family, is a reaction to what he sees as sanitised media accounts of the war seen in the United States.

"All the images we (currently) have of our war are completely constructed -- whitewashed, redacted," said De Palma.

"One only hopes that these images will get the public incensed enough to get their congressmen to vote against the war," he added.

De Palma, whose 1989 "Casualties of War" about the Vietnam War also deals with the gang rape and murder of a young civilian girl, responded with "that's a good question" when asked why the United States seems unable to learn from its mistakes.

"Redacted" hits hard with its dramatic reenactment of the conditions, attitudes and stresses that led up to the real-life crime.

One of the soldiers involved, Private First Class Jesse Spielman, was in early August sentenced to 110 years in prison for his role in the rape and killings.

Shown through the imaginary video lens of one of the soldiers involved in the raid on the girl's home, De Palma's dramatisation is interlaced with actual news clips, documentary footage and stills from the war.

The decision to use the device of the videocam arose from De Palma's research on the Internet. "The blogs, the use of language, it's all there," he said.

He explained that legal obstacles in dealing with real people and events meant he was "forced to fictionalise things" to get the movie made.

"Redacted" will initially be distributed nationwide by Magnolia Pictures as a "classic art film," its producer Jason Kliot said. "If the response is strong one hopes the distribution will grow the film in a big way."

With a career spanning more than four decades, the prolific De Palma has never been tied to a particular genre, creating anything from thrillers such as "Mission: Impossible" to documentaries, comedies, and sci-fi flicks, breaking into bankability with "Greetings" (1968) for which he won a Silver Bear in Berlin.

BigT

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
insaniac

Sadly the transgressions occurring in Iraq are all too real:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/II06Ak01.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6970212.stm

Many suggest that Americans (and their British counterparts such as myself) carry on waving flags with their eyes closed as things get worse and worse. This is irresponsible. If your friend were to say he was going to bang his head against a wall, and you tried to stop him, and he did it anyway, would you then help him bang his head against that wall?

It is best not to let the issue get obfuscated with "support-our-troops" slogans: their very presence in Iraq places them needlessly in harm's way.

Britain was never threatened by Hussein, and now my friends and neighbors are in a situation where their only real "mission" is to not get killed. Blair banged his head against that wall along with Bush, and now the rest of us have to somehow mop up the blood. But it's not Blair's (or Bush's) blood, but the blood of our friends and family members. And you and I are none the safer, sorry to say.

0
Jordan Yerman

(Slightly off-topic, but Scarface is a cinema classic!)

0
The Anglo American

Good comment insaniac


I just hate that saying... "support our troops". It's a "Carl Rove" ism. The biggest manipulator of language since Stalin or the Third Reich. Of course we support our troops - we just don't support the people who put them there. It is all to do with transference of justification and we just have to get wise enough to deconstruct their comments and see them for the poor arguments that they are - Blair did it and Brown does it too in different ways. That is why I posted the article on Hanoi. Johnny {The Anglo American}.     

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from