Eliminating political opponents

A political murder. Gunned down at close range from behind. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />Maurice Templesman's agent Bill Ulman needs to be questioned about his activities surrounding this murder. An act which occurred during the United Nation's(UNTAG) presence here in Namibia to oversee elections in 1989.  Much has been written about Maurice Templesman's (CIA ?) involvement in the Congo just prior to the elections when the popular leader at the time was assassinated in the 1960’s. What was he doing in Namibia during 1989 ?

In retrospect its discovered he had everything to do with securing Namibia’s DIAMONDS for Oppenheimer/De Beers.  A new “old front” (Tempelsmann) was required in Namibia, to exert its influence and thus the outcome in the United Nation supervised elections headed by Martti Ahtisaariits, (UN Special representative). Under cloak and dagger, smoke and mirrors tactics Tempelsmann/Ulman assumed a defensively independent stance at first, and denied any involvement with De Beers. But he was quietly dovetailed into De Beers “pocketed”government officials in the police, prosecution and judiciary, who had in the past collaborated with De Beers officials in smuggling and theft syndicates.

(New York) Tempelsman’s in the meanwhile had cultured a deep relation with SWAPO 14 years before the independence of Namibia. So when he arrived here he had entrenched his influence, on all levels, on certain governments bureaucrats, to ensure the control of the new Namibian government and De Beers its diamonds.

He has succeeded beyond all expectations and exposed the extent of this influence when he threatened the President in 2003, that if he allowed the government to execute a resolution it past to test the international rough diamond price in 2003, he would be playing with nuclear weapons, a better solution would be the acceptance of a US$30m “sweetner”.

The government never executed the sale of diamonds. At which point the government lost its power, shifting De Beers’s absolute grip on government affairs concerning minerals a step forward and instigating political instability within Swapo ranks much to their advantage in both respects.  

Namibia was swarming with South African Apartheid government's -"Stratcom" “third force” agents during 1989. Supported by its local structures, it was hell bent on disruption, manipulation, misinforming, spying, theft, sabotage and the murdering of political opponents, undermining the United Nations efforts in every respect. Many of these culprits have found refuge in South Africa, and the “Half” Truths and “lots” of Reconciliation Commission in South African, never resulted in any of the culprits being brought to justice, (This year an exception : when Vlok, van der Merwe and otherswere convicted in South Africa for poisoning Rev Chikane, a crime commited at Hose Kutako Airport in Windhoek, van der merwe was then a security policeman in Windhoek 1989) 

Now it is understood, given the close alliances, between “Stratcom’s –Third force” and De Beers and Tempelsman, why the police did not apprehend your agent Ulman and question him on his activities in the deceased's house before he was gunned down in 1989, because they are also co-perpetrators to the crime.

There can be no peace while the culprits run free here in Namibia and South Africa and the victims continue to suffer.During the Inquests held into Late Adv Lubowski's death, the police swore an Oath in court they were not monitoring him when he was alive. But secret Security Police files show that the police were monitoring the deceased under a WH11 code –listening device, planted in the home of the deceased – They committed perjury, presenting false verbal evidence under oath. The day following the murder the police removed the device. So blatantly orchestrated were these Inquest hearings into this murder that one can believe why not one of the string of lawyers who claimed to represent the deceased, particularly the prosecutor, did not even lead a security policeman’s evidence to support the fact that the police were monitoring the deceased at the time of his death and before. This was contrary to what the police had said before and also corroborates the security police documents indicating that they were in fact listening to all the discussions taking place in the deceased’s house and they know who the murders are. Maurice Tempelsman must also tell exactly how he got Bill Ulman to be a guest in the deceased's home in Windhoek, when he arrived in Namibia and who were the end-users to the information he was stealing from the deceased's house. And did he pass on the bank account numbers of the deceased to the South African military or Namibian security police, into which money was paid, as part of the murder plot, so that they could allege after his death that he was a paid spy for South African military intelligence unit and by doing so open the possibility that the new in-coming Swapo government might have had a roll in murdering one of their own key people because he was an alleged paid spy ?  The Namibian police’s “third force “operatives are silent, for obvious reasons they can not investigate themselves on these crimes and the other linked crimes e.g. the bombing of the United Nations offices in Namibia which the Security Council, UNITED NATIONS, as yet, have not investigate, leaving it up to this syndicate.Police records widely spread inform us. More to come in an endeavour to have justice seen to be done.  

Charles Courtney-Clarke (re e Merito)