Defending the Amateur

by mtippett | August 29, 2007 at 01:48 pm
648 views | 4 Recommendations | 4 comments

Videos

YouTube is ruining America

see larger video

sourced by mtippett

YouTube is ruining America

Andrew Keen has put out a book attacking citizen journalism among other things.  Pundits have called Andrew Keen the Ann Coulter of the anti-citizen journalism movement.  Lawrence Lessig says that Keen's book:

purports to be a book attacking the sloppiness, error and ignorance of the Internet, yet it itself is shot through with sloppiness, error and ignorance. It tells us that without institutions, and standards, to signal what we can trust (like the institution (Doubleday) that decided to print his book), we won’t know what’s true and what’s false. But the book itself is riddled with falsity — from simple errors of fact, to gross misreadings of arguments, to the most basic errors of economics.

So how could it be that a book criticizing the Internet — because the product of a standardless process where nothing is “vetted for accuracy” (as he says of Wikipedia) — could itself be so mistaken, when it, presumably, has been “vetted for accuracy” and was only selected for publication because it passed the high standards of truth imposed by its publisher — Doubleday?


And Dan Gillmor says his work is:

a shabby and dishonest treatment of an important topic.


So if you're in Vancouver on the 24th you might want check out a panel I'm on with Mr. Keen at Vidfest:

Macro - The Wisdom of Crowds: Web 2.0 Democracy or Mob Mentality?

The Web 2.0 phenomenon has opened the floodgates on user participation, collaboration and content. Online communities and social software are hotter than ever, and the ability to interact with like-minded individuals instantaneously from anywhere around the world has had considerable benefits for users and businesses. But the Web 2.0 democracy, coupled with the anonymous nature of the internet, has also resulted in some unsavoury group behaviour and mob mentality, breeding fear and criticism. Do the benefits outweigh the risks? How do you as an individual or business cope when the mob takes over? How will the web evolve past these growing pains? Join the panel for this very lively, provocative and stimulating debate.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
gmony714
gmony714
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:10 on August 29th, 2007

mtippett, print media and network news has a vested interest in discrediting nowpublic. sales and viewership are down because they have lost touch in their ivory towers. The Elite Media is very threatened by citizen journalism so we must expect and expose these paid propagandists.

PEP
PEP
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 17:35 on August 29th, 2007

mtippett,  good stuff. It's always been my belief that when you go to criticize the other guy's front yard, yours had best be tip top. I also don't like stereotyping things, like all MSM  is bad/slanted; all CJ is sloppy/slanted. Open communications, rather than building walls, is the key to the 2lst century, where everyone can be connected.

0
mtippett

I second that.

0
asterix

michael:

when people criticize the so-called citizen media sphere, they forget one crucial thing. even the pure-bred journalism [print/tv/radio] relies upon ordinary 'citizens' for their craft. think about the 'sources' that feeds the journalists' stories. the web/internet made it possible to bypass the traditional press/media mechanism and reach an audience directly with the insider information some of these erstwhile 'sources' [otherwise known as 'citizens'] possess. for me, i think 'citizen journalism' is a misnomer, all true journalism always relies on its 'citizens' to provide it credible information and credibility itself.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from