Gazans Flood Through Border to Egypt

by Brian A Kennedy | January 23, 2008 at 06:08 am
407 views | 2 Recommendations | 5 comments

Videos

Gazans clash with Egyptian police at Rafah - 22 Jan 08

see larger video

sourced by Brian A Kennedy

Gazans clash with Egyptian police at Rafah - 22 Jan 08
After gunmen destroyed the wall between the Gaza Strip and Egypt, tens of thousands of Gazans flooded into Egypt in a mad rush to buy scarce supplies.
Gazans rushed to buy food, fuel and other supplies that have become scarce because of an Israeli blockade - aimed at stopping rocket attacks from Gaza.

Egyptian police took no action to stop people crossing.

Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak says he allowed Gazans in to buy food, but Israel urged Egypt to restore security.

Correspondents say the breaching of the border is a security concern for Israel, as Egypt is a main source of weapons for the militant groups in Gaza.

People then packed into cars and donkey carts, or crossed the border on foot, to buy essential goods.

Among them was Ibrahim Abu Taha, a father of seven, who told the Associated Press news agency: "We want to buy rice and sugar, milk and wheat and some cheese."

One Gaza woman told the BBC as she crossed the border: "We're going over there to our family. They're all there. I haven't seen [them] for 10 years."
Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Brian A Kennedy

Update from Reuters: Apparently Hamas blew up the wall with explosives.

0
Swan

Hello Moonwolf,

The international community should be ashamed as it stands mute, eyes averted shuffling its feet while Israel maintains a concentration camp, the likes of which has not been seen since Nazi Germany.

Clearly you've never been in a concentration camp, or subjected to Nazism, else you'd never have made such an uninformed ridiculous statement of fantasy.

Israel has done nothing to contravene the Geneva Convention.  Each time rockets are fired into Israel, entire families are destroyed, just as I'm sure happens when Israel fires rockets.  I do know one thing, Israel doesn't instigate the violence - they react to it.

I've lived in Israel and I know about the violence that is perpetrated there - have you ever been there?  Ever been to Palestine?  I have.  You should speak to the Palestinians there who detest their government for what they've brought upon them and continue to bring.

Of course Israel defends itself, any country worth it's salt would do the same.  When you read newspapers, do you hold your judgement till you've managed to read both sides, fairly and without a bias?

Methinks you have a hidden agenda - perhaps a little anti-semitic?

Try reading the other side for a change.

Jerusalem: May 2....Palestinian terrorists murdered 4 young Jewish children and their pregnant
mother this afternoon. The terror attack targeted the family vehicle while it was traveling on the road that leads to the Gaza Strip settlement bloc of Gush Katif.

Another Israeli civilian traveling in a separate car suffered moderate gunfire wounds in the attack near the Netzer Hazani settlement.

The terrorists arrived by car from the nearby Palestinian village of Dir al Ballah
and began to fire at passing Israeli vehicles, consequently killing the mother
and her four children. Another Israeli traveling in the opposite direction, was
also wounded.

After spraying the station wagen with bullets, the Palestinian terrorists walked up to the 4 terrified little girls and shot each one of them twice in the head, police said.
The 8-month-old pregnant mother was shot in her belly at point blank range as
she tried to cover her children
(Emphasis is mine.)

Here you can read again, how Palestinians have come into Israel, not to kill any military - but innocent hikers; suicide bombers killing shoppers in malls; numerous cowardly drive-by shootings, including innocent teenagers; bombs in the local Tel Aviv market place; grandmothers with babies in their arms and city buses bombed.

And Israel is condemned for wanting to protect itself?

I think you'd benefit from reading fair and balanced news Moonwolf, instead of watching particular TV channels and reading newspapers, who specifically (for their own reasons) report only slanted news.

I welcome any further discussion, if you're so inclined. 

Here's a little light reading on current anti-semitism in the United States from the Anti-Defamation League.
         ~ Swan

 

0
Swan

Hello Moonwolf,

Your equation of anything anti-Israeli or anti-Zionist as Anti-semitism doesn't wash with anyone in the know.

And just what is it that you think you "know" Moonwolf?

What do you "know" that you've never read in the newspapers or watched on TV?

Unless you've actually spent any length of time in the Middle East, you cannot know.  You can quote from what you read, but you don't know. 

... and being starved , killed and tortured

And you know this first hand do you?

Did you even read the information I left for you?  Forget it, I know that you didn't, or you would have said something in your reply.  And this is precisely what I mean about having a fair and balanced view of things that happen.

You chose not to read the information (or simply skipped it) and therefore maintain your blindness of what's really happening in the Middle East. I do understand where you're coming from, much as you'll deny it.

I get personal reports and phonecalls from friends that I trust in Israel all the time.

And you have your newspapers and TV.  I think it's very sad to base your entire personal belief system on printed media.
         ~ Swan

 

0
Swan

Hello again Moonwolf,

Thank you for making my point.  All your information is gleaned from the media alone.  Let's take each link that you've so kindly offered in the interests of an:

... unending supply of proof to NP readers
I see why you quoted this publication in particular, it's called "If Americans Knew" Oh and I see that they sell Arab t-shirts with Arabic writing too.  I checked their "About" page, here's an excerpt for our readers:
The mission of If Americans Knew is to inform and educate the
American public on issues of major significance that are unreported,
underreported, or misreported in the American media.

It is our belief that when Americans know the facts on a subject,
they will, in the final analysis, act in accordance with morality,
justice, and the best interests of their nation, and of the world. With
insufficient information, or distorted information, they may do the
precise opposite.

First of all they're discounting the fact that major newspapers here and elsewhere have sister papers in most countries, with whom they share information.  Even the English version of Al Jazeera is available to anyone who wants to read it.

There are thousands upon thousands of Jews in America who have relatives in Israel, who can give them first hand information about what is happening there.

I don't think American media typically "misreports" events in the Middle East.  I'm not saying that they can't get it wrong once in a while, but they speak as if the entire population of America is pro-Israel.

Israel is the largest recipient of US. aid in the entire world. It
receives more aid than that given to all the countries of sub-Saharan
Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, put together.
Well that just sounds like sour grapes to me.  Any country looks to it's allies for aid if needed.  Just because they're not getting a piece of the cake, it becomes part of their mission statement.  That's very odd.

Then again, as the rest of their mission statement is one long diatribe of America and Israel and their big "cover up."  They're either paranoid or whimsical, I haven't decided which yet.  I have decided that I'd rather read Al Jazeera than a publication that calls itself, "If Only America Knew."

So pardon me if I don't think too highly of that particular "reference" that you provided. 

Your next link was to a web site named "Sound Off Egypt" whose main permanent heading/links include:  Terrorizing Palestine; Israeli Massacres and Israeli's[sic] Leader.   Those links look just a tad biased to me and don't indicate any semblance of fair reporting.

Frankly I thought the following quote to be purposefully degrading and simultaneously hurtful to the Jewish people and a way to incite their enemies to even more hatred.

Who is
Ariel Sharon

He is one of the Zionists, He sucks blood like (if not better than) his partners.

The original formatting has the question in 10 times the font size I have here.  Pretty telling statement about where they and you are coming from - and you claim not to be anti-semitic, when this is the paper you quote to me?

I simply can't take anything that appears there at face value.  The fanatacism that I've read there already has determined that it's nothing more than a hate fest.

Moonwolf, we could go on trading links ad infinitum but it serves no purpose to our readers in a dead end debate like this one has become.  You're not prepared to follow the links I give you to see another side and that tells me that you're debating on emotion, not facts.

I'm done here.
       ~ Swan

0
Barry ORegan

I guess both have valid viewpoints, what I do know is Yassar once said at the UN that the Israel-Palestinian conflict basically boils down to who is has the most influential "Imaginary Friend".(I am sure he was referring to Jesus and David)

Perhaps below a statement made by a King to a peasant sitting on the ground digging for root vegetables may explains it all.  It slips my mind who said, but it was said on  conflicts of classes in the system of conflicting governments.

Peasant.. Who are you?

King.. I am your King.

Peasant.... I didn't vote for you?

King.... You don't vote for your King, I am given this title by The Lady of the Lake,...



...her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur
from the bosom of the water signifying by Divine Providence that I,
Arthur, was to carry Excalibur.



That is why I am your king! 

Peasant...I do not think so as "We live in an anarcho-syndicalistic commune. We take it in turns to be
leaders, one week each. Any decisions have to be passed at a council
meeting, 1/2 majority for external matters and 2/3 majority for
internal matters."

King... Shut Up! 

Peasant....."Listen -- strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis
for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a
mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. "


King......."Be quiet!"


Peasant......"Well you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!"


King......"Shut up!"


Peasant........."I mean, if I went around sayin' I was an empereror just because some
moistened twat had lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away! "


King........."Shut up! , Will you shut up!" ( King Strikes Peasant)

Peasant......"Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. "


King........."Shut up!" (King strikes Peasant again)


Peasant....."Oh! Come and see the violence inherent in the system! --- HELP! HELP! I'm being repressed!"

King........ BLOODY PEASANT !!! (Kicks Peasant on the Ground)  

Peasant.......Oh, what a give away. Did you hear that, did you hear that, eh?....
That's what I'm on about -- did you see him repressing me, you saw it
didn't you?

So in ending, it is the one who wields the power that is the victor, those who fight back are repressed, still a sad story of events, in which I hope their will be an peaceful end in sight for both Palestine and Israel.  Obviously war and terroism is not working for either side, so hopefully peace will be used.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from