Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Is 47-Million-Year-Old Fossil Missing Link?
Share: 
by BMCWrites | May 20, 2009 at 01:33 pm
246 views | 0 Recommendations | 2 comments
Lefty scientists are excited this week about what they claim is the discovery of a 47-million-year-old fossil. Maybe it’s just me, but I can’t get too excited about “discovering” Larry King. -- Bob McCarty Writes
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 06:23 on May 23rd, 2009
frankly, big deal and just another educated guess. i sincerly doubt there in any missing link despite PhD`ers saying otherwise. evolution like fundamentalist creationism are all hooey!
spend your university money on bettering the human condition not digging up old bones which doesnt pay most of our bills. shove evloution and secular humanists into that calder.
blaire
at 20:39 on May 23rd, 2009
Re Blair's comment above, how can evolution AND creationism BOTH be hooey?? We are here aren't we? One of them must be true. there is no other alternative. I am a creationist because the scientific evidence supports creation, not evolution. The "47,000,000 year old fossil" will soon be discredited, along with "Piltdown Man", "Nebraska Man", "Peking Man", "Lucy" and all the rest, but you won't read about it on the front page of your newspaper.
Remember a few years ago when a "fragment of Mars having evidence of primitive life was found?? Do you remember seeing similar headlines and fanfare when it was discredited a short time later?? Think about it!