Alberta's Oil Sands: Dirty Birds and Broken Promises

by Jordan Yerman | December 11, 2008 at 07:19 am
190 views | 15 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Like I want to stroll on that sand

Like I want to stroll on that sand

see larger image

uploaded by katakanadian

Inarguably, Alberta's oil sands are a boon to the Canadian economy: export revenues, jobs, infrastructure, attendant service industries... but this comes at a huge ecological price, preventing Canada from meeting its Kyoto obligations, which we're not even close to achieving.

If you happen to be a duck, it's even worse:

It was not a lake, but a tailings pond - a store for toxic waste from the oil sands extraction process, made up of water, clay, sand, residual bitumen and heavy metals.

Most of the ducks died, killed by the slick of oil on the water's surface.

"It was horrifying," says Ruth Kleinbub, a field naturalist in nearby Fort McMurray, the city at the heart of the industry in the province of Alberta.

It is an argument that environmentalists say the government has lost.

"When we are looking at the tar sands, we are looking at a project that is the largest capital investment project on the face of the planet, the largest industrial project on the planet, and the ecological implications are just as great," says Mike Hudema, an Edmonton-based climate and energy campaigner with Greenpeace Canada.

Oil sands production, which requires large amounts of energy and water to extract the bitumen from the sand, is said to produce on average at least three times the greenhouse gas emissions of conventional oil extraction.

Alberta has been waging a PR campaign to convince Canada (and the world) that the oil sands are ecologically viable. Alberta is not winning so far.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Paschen

Is the loom not one of Canada's National emblems? Well First the Ducks then the People will eventually follow them.

0
harringtola

Did the company turn off the system that deters birds because it is costly? The fact that it was cold is not a reason to turn it off. That is an excuse.

0
Kim Elliott

This photo was taken for http://www.rabble.ca

Kim Elliott has contributed a photo to this story.

0
sara star

Alberta is spending $25 million for PR in Europe, trying to convince them that there is no problem. (see my story Nov 14). That money can be better spent cleaning up their mess. We aren't saying close down the tar sands, but let's be more responsible.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Paschen
First Flagged at 7:32 AM, Dec 11, 2008 by Paschen
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (15)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from