NP Rank:
Burning coal at home is making a comeback
Although accounting for a tiny fraction of the coal consumed in the US each year, the use of coal for primary and secondary heating in homes has been rising. In coal-producing regions of the country, coal is a cheap alternative to heating with oil, gas, or electricity. But burning coal also produces more CO2 per unit of heating energy than any other fossil fuel, and often produces other dangerous polutants, such as sulfur and mercury.
Aptly, perhaps, for an era of hard times, coal is making a comeback as a home heating fuel.
Problematic in some ways and difficult to handle, coal is nonetheless a cheap, plentiful, mined-in-America source of heat. And with the cost of heating oil and natural gas increasingly prone to spikes, some homeowners in the Northeast, pockets of the Midwest and even Alaska are deciding coal is worth the trouble.
Burning coal at home was once commonplace, of course, but the practice had been declining for decades. Coal consumption for residential use hit a low of 258,000 tons in 2006 — then started to rise. It jumped 9 percent in 2007, according to the Energy Information Administration, and 10 percent more in the first eight months of 2008.
Online coal forums are buzzing with activity, as residential coal enthusiasts trade tips and advice for buying and tending to coal heaters. And manufacturers and dealers of coal-burning stoves say they have been deluged with orders — many placed when the price of heating oil jumped last summer — that they are struggling to fill.
Coals vary in quality, but on average, a ton of coal contains about as much potential heat as 146 gallons of heating oil or 20,000 cubic feet of natural gas, according to the Energy Information Administration. A ton of anthracite, a particularly high grade of coal, can cost as little as $120 near mines in Pennsylvania. The equivalent amount of heating oil would cost roughly $380, based on the most recent prices in the state — and over $470 using prices from December 2007. An equivalent amount of natural gas would cost about $480 at current prices.
Crowd Power
-
Milieunet
Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Recommendations (25)
-
harringtola
Town-send, Massachusetts, United States -
Lazylizards
Perth, Australia -
Milieunet
Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Amitjha
new delhi, India







Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 22:41 on December 26th, 2008
Not a good come back. Excellent Post and well researched. Thank you for writing and posting this. I wish I could double Flag it.
at 22:46 on December 26th, 2008
Thanks for tha story, so we will see escalating coal prices now?
at 20:04 on December 27th, 2008
Seems like you got manual highlight to work! yay!
at 02:59 on December 28th, 2008
That is bad news for climate
at 06:10 on December 28th, 2008
Are we heading towards energy famine? You would think that energy poverty (where people do not have access to electricity, or cannot afford to pay for its use) is a malaise in developing countries, not America!
History bears some useful lessons. By the mid-1600s, Londoners were not only using coal in their homes and making London one of the dirtiest and most unhealthy city in Europe, they were in fact desperate to have coal. Fire wood was costing two to five times as much as coal. Coal was surely killing the city through pollution but not enough heat would have killed the poor. See Freese, B (2003): Coal A Human History.
at 15:33 on January 14th, 2009
See my related story about Corning and coal.
at 14:37 on February 25th, 2009
Hello to all ! Greetings From Poland. Great and vaulable site. KBGKBG