Canada to Levy Carbon Taxes on Import Goods from Polluting Countries?

by Barry Artiste | March 31, 2008 at 05:44 am
2910 views | 27 Recommendations | 11 comments

Photos

Canada to Levy Carbon Taxes on Goods from Polluting Countries?

Canada to Levy Carbon Taxes on Goods from Polluting Countries?

see larger image

uploaded by Barry Artiste

Opinion
Barry Artiste, Now Public Contributor

I asked this very same question almost a year ago, though no response from anyone in government of the mainstream media.

Certainly this will create a backlash from both the consumer who want cheap and third party companies who import cheaply made products from Asian Countries whose Carbon Footprint will be ever increasing over time as demand for Cheap Consumables by North American Consumers who on one hand Demand Environmental Change, but are unwittingly contributing to it every time they purchase from WalMart style outlets, in fact just about any Retail outlet as all exclusively feature cheaply made consumer goods from Asia.

As I have always stated North America has virtually outsourced our Birthright as a Manufacturing Giant to other countries for that "Big Yellow Smiley Face", which one day we will all pay a much higher price for a cleaner planet, as non existent pollution control laws caused by manufacturing countries who care not when Lowest Price is the Law, and in turn deprive future North American generations of much needed manufacturing jobs.

At least if Manufacturing were brought back home, it would enable our Pollution controls to be adhered to.  North Americans should know those Multivitamins with Vitamin C , even the Cartoon Brands they pop into their and their kids mouths, are manufactured exclusively in China.  That is a proven fact.  Check it out, the folks whose Food manufacturing record speaks for itself, is supply your drugstore and supermarket shelves with your vitamin supplemts, nice to know you got them on the cheap in order to feed them to your kids.

And though your fish sticks say made in North America, wrong again, these fish are caught off the coast of Asia, where the World Health Organization has banned fish from most of these waters, because of the massive amounts of cancer causing agents dumped in these water.

Carbon Taxing imports would be a pretty cheap price to pay to clean our global house.

Once our jobs are back in North America, perhaps that North American Dream we have all heard of, will be worth waking up to.

Below is a story link I wrote on this possibilty a year ago.

http://www.nowpublic.com/environment/b-c-citizens-will-get-buy-carbon-credits

Romina Maurino, THE CANADIAN PRESSMarch 27, 2008TORONTO - Countries such as Canada and the United States may impose a "carbon tariff" on goods from China and other developing countries in the next few years, a move that could bring manufacturing jobs back to North America, CIBC World Markets predicts.The investment bank's report says the economies of China, India and other developing countries have expanded so much that they now surpass the established industrialized world in belching out carbon dioxide pollution blamed for climate change."It becomes absurdly quixotic to ban coal plants in North America while at the same time China's got 570 coal plants slated to go into production between now and 2012, 30 plants between now and the Olympics," CIBC economist Jeff Rubin says."We're moving in opposite directions."With some advanced countries enacting carbon taxes, carbon trading systems and other measures to lower emissions, CIBC believes the growing pollution from developing countries will provoke penalties against their exports.That would benefit the environment, and will also bring certain jobs back to North America, since carbon emission taxes and high oil prices would offset the benefit of cheap labour, Rubin says."Chinese goods will have to pay for the carbon that they emitted and they'll pay for that when they enter our market place by paying that tariff," Rubin said in an interview."Once we impose the tariff on Chinese goods, some of those industries will be coming home, because . . . energy and carbon efficiency is going to matter more than labour costs."Non-metallic mineral products - cement, glass and lime - with energy intensity 130 per cent higher than the Chinese industrial average, are likely to return to North America, as well as the printing, primary metal manufacturing and machinery industries.Rubin believes the tariff, based on $45 per tonne of carbon dioxide or equivalent, would raise roughly $55 billion a year from Chinese exports to the United States, and raise U.S. consumer price inflation by more than 0.6 percentage points.Many in the West assumed that since industrialized nations were primarily responsible for the historical build-up of greenhouse gases in the world, they should bear the brunt of efforts to cut back, a view that underpinned the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, which exempted developing countries.But Rubin sees a shift in sentiment."What I'm suggesting is that the minute that we start putting a price on our own domestic emissions, then our tolerance of those who do not is going to fade very quickly," he said."What we're going to say is that if you don't play by the same carbon rules, that's an unfair trade subsidy that we're gong to countervail against."British Columbia became the first jurisdiction in North America to introduce a carbon tax on consumers last month, when the provincial government announced that starting July 1, it will introduce an escalating carbon tax of $10 per tonne of carbon or about 2.4 cents on a litre of gasoline.The tax will be applied to most fossil fuels such as gasoline, diesel, coal, propane, natural gas and home heating fuel. The levy will rise to $30 per tonne of carbon - about 7.2 cents on a litre of gasoline - by 2012.But such taxes have yet to catch on in the rest of the country. Federal Environment Minister John Baird said earlier this month the Conservatives would continue with regulations targeting big polluters to control carbon emissions rather than taxes.Alberta, by far the largest greenhouse gas emitter in Canada, opposes a carbon tax, and both Ontario and Manitoba have said they won't consider it. Quebec, for its part, introduced a form of carbon tax last year that directs revenues to initiatives supporting green technology.Europe, which is well ahead of North America in terms of domestic carbon pricing, is already talking about a carbon tariff that it can apply to imports from countries that don't play by the same carbon rules, the CIBC report said, adding that concept is likely to gain currency in the U.S. and Canada."We're going to be following the Europeans," Rubin said."It doesn't matter who wins the White House after the next election, both (Republican nominee John) McCain, (Democratic contenders Barack) Obama and (Hillary) Clinton are all on record for cap-and-trade, and putting a price on carbon emissions on the U.S. economy. When that happens, you can rest assured that we'll follow suit here in Canada."

Below are links to many of my Good Stuff past stories as a warning to readers of the health risks they take by buying or using cheap imports.

http://www.nowpublic.com/made_canada_better_check_again

http://www.nowpublic.com/environment/product-canada-dont-bet-it-0

http://www.nowpublic.com/china_learns_capitalism_very_quickly

http://www.nowpublic.com/culture/xmas-chinas-billion-dollar-toy-story

http://www.nowpublic.com/u_s_officials_throw_out_toothpaste_made_in_china

http://www.nowpublic.com/proudly_outsourcing_your_birthright

http://www.nowpublic.com/400-000-products-recalled-u-s-safety-group

http://www.nowpublic.com/faulty-chinese-exports-beginning-trade-war

http://www.nowpublic.com/deeper-threat-lies-behind-made-china-product-woes

http://www.nowpublic.com/health/canada-food-imports-china-safe-eat

http://www.nowpublic.com/china_canadas_deadly_breadbasket

http://www.nowpublic.com/china_defends_its_food_safety

http://www.nowpublic.com/chinatown_wary_chinese_imports

http://www.nowpublic.com/more_problems_chinese_products

http://www.nowpublic.com/china_leading_source_recalled_products

http://www.nowpublic.com/opinions/christmas-season-date-rape-drug-found-chinese-toy

http://www.nowpublic.com/culture/christmas-season-marvel-recalls-curious-george-dolls

http://www.nowpublic.com/culture/christmas-toy-csi-toy-kit-asbestos-warning

http://www.nowpublic.com/culture/buying-america

http://www.nowpublic.com/crime/shocking-letters-santa

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/obama-ban-all-toys-china

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Rob Walker
Rob Walker
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:01 on March 31st, 2008

Barry Artiste, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Barry Artiste

Thanks Rob, you know I wrote to governments and media about taxing imports from polluting countries a year ago and nary a response.  I provided a link from my article on this last year as well in my opinions section for readers.

And to think I am not even a Rocket Scientist to figure out what they are currently proposing now!!

 

ScienceDave
ScienceDave
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:09 on March 31st, 2008

Barry Artiste, I like this story. It's good stuff.

The CIBC World Markets report can be downloaded as a pdf here.

0
Barry Artiste

Thanks Dave for the comments, Good Stuff Flag and the pdf link.

I put it this way, when I wrote to these governing bodies and mainstream media. I put it to them that "If Polluting countries want a share of the Global Market, then they should also have to pay Carbon Taxes on their exported goods and we as consumers should pay a carbon tax on the imported goods, thus to support our Global Economies who wish to reduce pollution, as well as adhere to both our Pollution control laws whichever is more stringent.   As I said before, nary a word was written back to me on this obvious idea. Because let's face it, cheap imports are pretty much disposable consumer good, where a long quality life cycle will always take a back seat to a cheap import price in which these throw away products ultimately end up in our landfills for us to deal with.  We get what we pay for.

 

0
ScienceDave

Ok, I read through the CIBC report - I am very dissapointed in how the authors represented the data.

First, they make claims such as, "Developing world now principal source of emissions", yet they only mention of total emissions, not per capita emissions; of course developing countries, whose population growth rates far exceed those of developed countries, will: a) emit more CO2 as a whole; and b) emit CO2 at a faster rate.

With statements like, "Total global emissions have risen by a cumulative 25% since the beginning of the decade...[while] emissions in the most advanced economies of the world have grown by a paltry 5%", its hard not to get the impression the authors were writing this for a very particular readership (i.e. they are attempting to dodge the inevitable, "we're not to blame, you're to blame!" type-accusations).

Lastly, the report also fails to mention how developed countries (like Canada and the United States) emit approximately 10 fold more CO2 per person than developing countries (including India and China).  This information can be obtained form the US DOE's Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC).

0
Barry Artiste

Thanks Dave for the link and comments, disheartening to say the least, but some I know who visit China regularly say when visiting there wake up most mornings in the cities and cannot breathe from all the manufacturing pollution in the air, and have seen personally once beautiful rivers and seaways putrid with human waste and industrial waste and a mid morning Sky in daylight resembling evening at dusk, so there must be something to it, as I know of no other city in North America suffering a similar fate, at least not yet.  I would be interested in any Mainland Chinese Now Public Readers who can verify all the above, it would be greatly appreciated.

0
ScienceDave

I do not doubt there are severe pollution problems in mainland China.  My problem is with the way in which developing nations are being framed by the report: as the up-and-coming perpetraters to be punnished.  Basically, for not having become industrialized sooner, the western world is saying, "No, don't take the easy route to prosperity like we did - take the more perilous route."

How could a country like Canada justify such a tariff (notwithstanding problems with their manufacturing processes - i.e. toxins in toothpaste, etc.) when its citizens enjoy on the order of 6 times as much "energy" (read "emissions") per person?

I'm not saying its an easy thing to answer, but the very opposite - its a very difficult question the international community must address.  I just don't think tariffs are the way to go.

0
Barry Artiste

I agree in part Dave, but the products coming out of asia certainly do not put anyones mind at ease.

One wonders if these manufacturers just found an easier delivery system to rid their toxic chemicals by putting them in our consumable products?   We are no angels certainly, but we have  learned from our mistakes  in the past,  and you have to agree as a Country we have to express "due dilegence" and pass on our knowledge of past mistakes and solutions for developing nations to follow,  two wrongs won't make a right if we allow them to pollute in order to make money on toxic products and processes which ultimately find its way into our stores, and then into our landfills.  especially since there is technology out there to reduce it polluting effects and available to these developing countries to use but won't because their products then would be as costly as if produced in North America.

Anything else you can come up with on this topic Dave would be greatly appreciated.

Barbara McPherson
Barbara McPherson
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:56 on March 31st, 2008

Barry Artiste, I like this story. It's good stuff.  This is an important story and something that we should all be wrestling with.  It's not just the cheap stuff, tho, that we're buying from Asia.  I bought a winter jacket from Eddy Bauer -- asking price over $300 -- yep, made in China.  My particular beef is the food stuffs coming from dirty sources and concealed with "Product of Canada".  I think if more people knew where their food came from they would pay the price to buy local.

0
Barry Artiste

Thanks Barbara, that $300.00 Bauer Jacket most likely was only $50.00, yet over here the markup is incredible.  As for buying local, of course, though exotic fruits and vegetables still have to bought outside North America, lets buy fair trade if they have it or ensure our produce is free of dangerous chemicals. 

0
Frank Zaski

 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from