The Canadian oil sands dilemma

by 72JAG | March 2, 2009 at 04:20 am
220 views | 40 Recommendations | 13 comments

Photos

ripping it up

ripping it up

see larger image

uploaded by 72JAG

With America’s reliance upon Middle Eastern oil falling under increasing criticism, President Obama recently traveled to Canada to check out their oil sands operation with the hope of inspiring them to clean up their act; the meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Harper did not produce any measurable results, though.  The U.S. has been searching for alternatives to the high-quality oil it has depended upon for decades from the Middle East because of geopolitical pressures and depleting reserves in the region, but a new dependence upon Canadian oil may result in an even dirtier habit for America.

The dilemma surrounding America’s reliance upon domestic coal for a majority of its electricity generation is similar to the situation developing with America’s newest supplier of oil; for the time being, both seem to be a necessary evil.  A new age of environmental awareness has pushed the U.S. toward seeking to find a way to capture emissions from coal-fired power plants and ultimately clean the whole coal process, but the current technology is still dirty.  Much like the coal industry, excavation from the Canadian oil sands contributes copious amounts of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere and is extremely destructive to the surrounding environment, but, for the time being, it allows the American economy to continue to function. 

In today’s dual-natured reality—a heightened environmental climate within a worsening recession—President Obama seems to be caught between getting the American economy back on track and investing in technologies that will clean up some of the processes we currently use to get energy.  The tightrope he has to walk keeps getting thinner and thinner and is leading him to more uncertain terrain.

Of course, there are numerous recent studies that point to the fact that investing in clean energy technologies creates jobs, but oil and coal are not going to disappear overnight, so it would behoove America to begin to figure out ways to clean the whole fossil-fuel-to-energy process while also trying to make the transition to a low carbon economy happen.  Finding a way to make extracting oil, as well as burning coal, cleaner will benefit society in the short- and long-term, but there is a certain sense of impatience developing in the environmental movement that is contributing to a growing trend that America should abandon of fossil fuels altogether; a proposition as preposterous as drilling for more oil or mining more coal. 

It goes without saying that forcing oil and coal companies to invest in technologies to clean their extraction or burning processes costs money.  The more regulations that are placed upon projects like Canada’s oil sands, the closer the projects come to being unprofitable; where then will America get 20% of its oil from?  Similarly, if we place regulations on emissions from coal-fired power plants, those costs have to be recovered somewhere, most likely in the mining process, and the practice of mountaintop mining becomes necessary.  America’s energy dilemma is daunting. President Obama’s goal of finding a way to meet U.S. energy demands while at the same time creating environmental regulations is commendable, but is it practical?  His recent trip to Canada proved that this balancing act, in today’s marketplace, sometimes cannot produce measurable results.

Both Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and President Obama said during their recent meeting together that energy security and the environmental impact of Canada’s oil sands operations will be priorities in the development of a joint energy policy that seeks to foster the development a continental dependence upon the fossil fuel.  “What we know is that the oil sands create a big carbon footprint. So the dilemma that Canada faces, the United States faces, and China and the entire world faces is how do we obtain the energy that we need to grow our economies in a way that is not rapidly accelerating climate change,” President Obama said recognizing the precarious position the world’s major economies have gotten themselves into.

The fact that these issues are being addressed through policy and legislation in America is reassuring, but the practice of extracting oil from the tar sands in Canada and of burning coal are...

__________________

Read the full article at:

http://www.examiner.com/x-2903-Energy-Examiner
~y2009m3d1-The-Canadian-oil-sands-dilemma

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Rob Walker

I enjoyed this story, well researched and thought out. Thanks for posting!

0
Amrinder Singh

Really an interested output.Find here more about daimaonds

1
Paschen

One can not make Oil even less Oil from Oil Sand a clean or cleaner energy source. We have to reduce power consumption and regulate it to a point, same we will have to do with Drinking water, regulate it and restrict it. Then Other energy sources have to be introduced such as renewable energy and if needed the main part of that energy has to be reserved for essential services and the Industry. Leaving the home if needed with next to no power or having to invest into Solar for instance. Now, the Industry will have to invest into Renewable energy as well or be cut of the grid. Same for the Auto industry, we have to take the big gas users of the road now and not wait or faze them out. They have to be replaced with clean energy efficient car and trucks. Their is no time left and they better make it an energy revolution or face the consequences.

  

0
Jarrett Martineau

Great post. Thanks for sharing this.

0
Pythiian1

Great piece about the oil sands issue.  Thanks.

1
René

Did Obama even have time to visit the Oil Sands site? He was only in Canada 7 hours.

1
72JAG

I thought the sentence structure of that first line might throw some people off; I apologize for that.  The idea I was trying to convey was that President Obama's first trip abroad was to Canada where the oil sands region was top on the list of discussion topics with PM Harper.  (if they didn't visit it physically, the went there mentally was the thinking)

The fact that the two were discussing the carbon emissions from and the sustainability of the oil sands process is a giant leap forward in American leadership. The first few weeks of the Obama Administration have put environmental issues at the forefront of American energy and climate policy.  The fact that President Obama is concerned about the environmental and climatic impacts of the Canadian oil sand region speaks volumes to the direction the U.S. is headed with regards to the UNFCCC in Copenhagen later this year.  Importing large amounts of 'dirty oil' may prevent America from signing an international climate treaty, and this is on President Obama's mind.

America has backed itself into a dilemma of sorts; do we honor environmental or economic principles.  The idea behind the piece is that while ideally we would like to see a marriage of the two camps, in reality, sometimes progress is just beginning the dialogue.

2
eastvanray

Another example of uninformed journalism.  The US already imports more oil from Canada than any other country.

1
Blue Crush

Hmm ... that's what I was thinking too.

0
dowdinsk

From the continuation of Jag's article:

Currently, most of the oil produced from the Canadian region is exported to America.  America imports roughly 20% of its oil from Canada, which recently surpassed Saudi Arabia as America’s largest supplier.

Still uninformed?

1
72JAG

Farther down in the piece is stated,

"Currently, most of the oil produced from the Canadian region is exported to America.  America imports roughly 20% of its oil from Canada, which recently surpassed Saudi Arabia as America’s largest supplier."

The sentence structure probably could be reworded here, but I thought I made the point clearly that America imports 20% of its oil from Canada, and that Canada is America's largest supplier of oil.

Thanks for reading and commenting.

0
kuuva

Here is a link showing the top 15 oil exporters to the US

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html

Energy produciton is complicated. We cannot just switch to solar or wind, the grid would not support it. If not coal then where, how many people love the concept of nuclear? I would say most likely as there is a push for a reduction of CO2, you will see a larger portion of our electricity being produced from nuclear. Even energy conservation can only go so far.

here is a link showing the % of power generated by source

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/figes1.html

Really this is two issues, electical power generation and petroleum use/supply.

And remember Canada is not being forced to tap into its oil sands. Each nation makes choices and these are often driven by economic benefits. As we have all seen, there are often environmental impacts by these choices. But as a nation of free people you have the power to enforce whatever you so choose.

1
72JAG

Thank you for those links.

Canada is America's biggest supplier; it is extremely profitable to feed America's habit, which is probably why the powers that be (in Canada) are willing to allow the destruction of their environment surrounding the oil sands in exchange for this partnership.

You can find levels of petroleum consumption listed by country HERE.

The piece attempted to draw the comparison between two industries, petroleum and coal, and show that the Obama Administration is experiencing the same dilemma in both industries...where do we get our energy from in the near-term if not from dirty sources?

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rob Walker
First Flagged at 4:40 AM, Mar 2, 2009 by Rob Walker
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (40)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from