Canadians ponder cost of rush for dirty oil

by LotusFlower | July 14, 2008 at 11:09 am
364 views | 2 Recommendations | 1 comment

Videos

Oil Sand in Alberta by bianca 오일샌드

see larger video

sourced by LotusFlower

Oil Sand in Alberta by bianca 오일샌드

Photos

Syncrude Main Plant

Syncrude Main Plant

see larger image

uploaded by mtnflyer3

Here we get a long and considered article on Canada's oil sand bonanza or environmental disaster depending on how you view it. Alberta as the new Kuwait. John Vidal's piece is a mixture of sound fact and comment and worth a read from whichever side of the barrel you sit.

The future of northern Alberta's aspen and pine woods, its rivers and animals are in doubt as the world's greatest modern oil rush accelerates. Shell, Chevron, Exxon, Total, Occidental, Imperial and most other oil majors have so far invested nearly $100bn Canadian dollars (£50bn) in the 1,160 square mile (3,000 square kilometre) "bitumen belt", which is being called the "new Kuwait".

A decade ago, the vast landscape of forests and lakes around Fort McMurray and the Athabasca river provided a fairly minor and barely profitable sand oil industry. But it is now pitted with hundreds of square kilometres of toxic waste ponds, mines that are 300ft deep, hundreds of miles of pipes and burgeoning petrochemical works. Every day brings a bumper to bumper stream of lorries carrying the world's largest plant, pipes and machinery to the area, as well as young men seeking fortunes, and, say critics, the devastation of a pristine land.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Syam AG
Syam AG
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 20:15 on July 14th, 2008

LotusFlower, I like this story. It's good stuff.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from