NP Rank:
Cap And Trade Bill 2009 HR 2454 Passed, So What Does That Mean?
The Cap and Trade Bill 2009 was passed in the U.S Senate on Friday, but what does that mean for the average American family? This 'green energy revolution climate bill' has already created a lot of debate from both the Republicans and the Democrats, and it will certainly affect America's economic condition.
It was a close vote to get the bill passed even: 219 voted for the bill and 211 voted against it, while only three people abstained from voting.
What is the cap and trade bill?
It aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 17 percent by 2020 and create some 'green' jobs, by putting a limit on the amout of pollution large industrial industries can output, and then if they go above that, they have to buy pollution permits.
If some companies don't need all that they are allocated, they can sell their permits to companies that do.
The Cap and Trade is a policy that protects human heath conditions through the prevention of large amounts of emission from different sources that pollute the environment. These sources have to gather emission allowances and had to comply to a strategy that includes meeting a required reduction in pollution, checking pollution control besides others.
There will be penalities for going above your allocated emission allowance, and the program will monitor things like acid rain, clean air rules, and emissions released into the atmosphere.
Now that the bill has passed, the biggest challenge will come this September when the Senate takes up legislation for the bill.
Much opposition to the bill in the Senate comes from the farm and coal state legislators who fear that such severe restrictions will damage the local economies of many towns and will raise the cost of things like electricity for the average American family.
Some critics say that if they have to import wind and solar electricity from other states, it will become too expensive to light their homes. This feeling is especially strong in the Southeast states.
Dissenting voices will only gain prominence in the Senate, where each state has equal representation.
“The Senate magnifies the significance of rural constituencies,” says Scott Segal of Bracewell and Giuliani, a Washington, D.C., law firm specializing in energy issues.
Last week, the Congressional Budget Office looked at the cost of such a bill in the year 2020 for average families. According to their calculations, based on the current bill that passed on Friday, the net annual economy-wide cost by the year 2020 would be $22 billion.
Companies that would have to adjust and purchase carbon allowances for example, will not absorb that cost themselves, the cost would be passed on to the consumer, and by 2020, according to the budget office, that cost would be about $175 per American household. That number is just the cost however, and does not take in to account the potential cost benefits that would come from reducing carbon emissions. The number equals about 0.2 percent of a family's after-tax income, on average.
Some households would benefit more though, as they might receive energy rebates and tax credits. Some of the poorest households would be most likely to see a rebate of about $40 a year, but the richer households would suffer more and would have to pay more.
See how the Congressional Budget Office broke it down.
Republican critics however, say that the $175 figure is much too low, and that it will actually cost Americans much more. If you live in a state where most of the energy supply comes from coal for example, it will most likely cost you more each year to live.
Farmers are also concerned that it will cost them more, because their business relies on machines like tractors, and animals such as cows, both of which are heavy emissions producers.
Some states stand to benefit from the bill and others to lose from it.
However, the bill still has to go through the Senate and it appears it has some tough competition there.
Two tightly interconnected issues could stop the bill in its tracks in the Senate. The first is mathematical: Currently, Democrats hold 59 seats in the upper house, a solid majority but not enough to sidestep a Republican filibuster that would kill hopes for the bill's passage (60 votes are needed to invoke cloture, which would override a filibuster attempt.)
The second is that the introduction of both a climate and energy bill may be too much at one time, rather than trying to pass two separate bills. Add on top of that the current economic climate, and supporters worry that there are already too many strikes against the bill.
A list of key fence-sitting Democratic senators could include Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Mark Warner of Virginia. Republicans who in the past have voiced support for energy or climate legislation include George Voinovich of Ohio and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, if concessions are made to promote nuclear power.
It remains to be seen what will happen however, but for now the bill is on the way to the Senate, and that will be decided in September.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada
Recommendations (33)

Anonymous users (7)
-
Jennings David L
Baltimore, Maryland, United States -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
albertacowpoke
Canada -
Pythiian1
New York, New York, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (65)
at 10:54 on August 19th, 2009
I believe that the cap and trade is a way for the republicians to gain control over the government, which we all know that they only want what is best for themsleves. How can you say that cows are creating more pollution than the cars you climb into everyday.....I believe that a greener america should take small steps, such as recyling and using less water, than getting rid of some peoples only income and raising the price of electric b/c it is just makig it ahrder for other people to live, where as it is already hard to live like it is today. I believe you all are stupid if you believe this will impact the world greatly......if this bill is passed than the U.S. will be going into the great depression!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go be ready TREE HUGERS!!!!!!!
at 16:00 on September 7th, 2009
David, You must be a real kook, to believe that this bill will help!!! I am ready also for to secede!
at 12:04 on September 10th, 2009
Does not one of you idiots talking about "succession" realize that the word is "secession", as in to secede, not to succeed. Success is prosperity, secession is withdrawl from a union. Jesus Christ, read a book.
at 12:21 on September 16th, 2009
We need to save the world at all costs, the CAT should pass our Congress, signed by BHO and then BHO should take the signed bill and peddle it to the rest of the world and get every nation to also sign the bill. Only then can we say that the world will be saved, otherwise we are just pis...g in the wind. To all the nay sayers of the bill, if we don't take action RIGHT NOW as people of the world we can almost certainly expect that our environment will experience changes so vast that all of mankind will cease to exist in about 5 (five) MILLION years. That is, if we don't let Iran and Russia destroy us with nuclear warefare before then.
at 16:56 on September 23rd, 2009
If this bill passes the people of Eastern Kentucky will become desperate quickly. We hard working people rely upon coal for JOB!!! Lets face it the last time I watched the news there wasn't many of these to be found. Aren't we in a recession. How is this bill going to help when everyone in Kentucky and our neighboring states are going to become unemployed and start using government assisted program. Come on people stand up for your jobs and keep the electric bills down for the elderly, they are hardly making it now.