NP Rank:
Civil disobedience over coal heads to D.C.
Endorsing the protest are the outspoken critics of fossil fuels, Al Gore and James Hansen, sure to stir up the ire of people who do not believe in AGW. The basic belief of AGW skeptics is that planet warming is caused by cyclical cycles in the Earth’s orbital path and in the intensity of sun’s radiant heat; further, they believe that CO2 is not the cause of global warming, but rather, a side-effect of these cyclical changes. In a nutshell, AGW skeptics believe that global warming is not human induced.
While there are many esteemed scientists endorsing AGW, growing criticism of the human-induced theory seems to be taking root in the American public. According to the Rasmussen report (Jan.’09), “forty-four percent (44%) of U.S. voters now say long-term planetary trends are the cause of global warming, compared to 41% who blame it on human activity”. According to the Pew Research Center (Jan.’09), “the only policy that ranks lower than protecting the environment (20%) among Republicans is dealing with global warming (16%)”.
These figures that essentially represent a snapshot of America’s concern for global warming may indicate that the protest in D.C. could be a dud. The protest, however, is highly organized, and participants have gone through training on how to participate in non-violent civil disobedience. Apparently, there are acts of non-violent civil disobedience scheduled before the rally.
Participants are concerned about the quantity of coal and the emissions released from burning it worldwide. Currently, there are 50,000 active coal plants in the world; energy demand is expected to rise 60% over the next 20 years. Without alternatives being developed, activists believe that more health and environmental related risks will continue to rise.
The protest in D.C. is a part of a string of protests that has been going on globally for the past year. Protests in Australia, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and United Kingdom have all been aimed at bringing attention to the process of burning coal for energy. Coal is the cheapest and most abundant energy source on earth at the moment, but activists believe that renewable energy in the form of wind, solar, and geothermal power is on the verge of being able to displace coal, making the construction of new coal-fired power plants unnecessary.
The recent push in the U.S. to build more coal-fired power plants has...
_________________________________________________________________________
Read the rest of my article at:
http://www.examiner.com/x-2903-Energy-Examiner
~y2009m2d26-Civil-disobedience-over-coal-heads-to-DC
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
shimaceo
Vancouver, Canada -
72JAG
Snowmass Village, Colorado, United States -
PrairieRailfan
United States -
stumbling monk
United States
Recommendations (34)
-
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Karenke4
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
lefty_liberated
New York, New York, United States












Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 02:39 on February 27th, 2009
Thank you for the post.
at 09:06 on February 27th, 2009
I think people that are willing to go to these lengths to protest the burning of coal deserve all the support we can give them - it's people like this that really make a difference in the world.
at 20:20 on February 27th, 2009
Thank you for reading and commenting today; I love the way those slide shows turn out after everyone adds photos to them.
Did anyone see this story in the Washington Post yesterday about Pelosi and Reid's intention to convert the U.S. Capitol Power Plant from coal to natural gas; could the protest be working before the protest takes place?
...as an aside, I was wondering if burning another fossil fuel is the best alternative. Although natural gas is cleaner than coal, it still results in massive environmental degradation out here in western Colorado where I live. Thousands of natural gas wells have been drilled all over BLM land. Check out this article I wrote a few weeks back on the boom-bust cycle in western CO; it talks about one particular town Parachute CO that has gone through several boom-bust cycles.