Climate change may uproot 6 million annually:UN

by Amitjha | December 8, 2008 at 09:07 pm
157 views | 16 Recommendations | 9 comments

Photos

Climate change may uproot 6 million annually:UN

Climate change may uproot 6 million annually:UN

see larger image

uploaded by Milieunet

It is areality that climate is all about change, it changes in every second.It is supportive to human existance after the same process of change.But the speed with which it is changing is alarming, this normal phenomena of change becomes disater when the its impact disturbes the human existence.The anthropogenic input in terms of accelerating the process of change is threatening the whole earth.We humans will be able to cope with this self generated problem in time or not, nobody can guess, but we can start working in the direction to control the disaster to its lowest potential. 


The impact of climate change could uproot around six million people each year, half of them because of weather disasters like floods and storms, a top U.N. official said on Monday.

The U.N. refugee agency (UNHCR) was making plans based on conservative estimates that global warming would force between 200 million and 250 million people from their homes by mid-century, said L. Craig Johnstone, the U.N. Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees.

"That means a displacement of something like six million people a year -- that's a staggering number," he told Reuters on the sidelines of the December 1-12 U.N. climate talks in Poland.

"Our operating assumption is to cover the minimum ... but we're not anywhere near being able to cover that right now," he said.

Johnstone said relief agencies would need to aid almost three million people a year displaced by sudden disasters.

Another three million would likely migrate due to gradual changes like rising sea levels, and be more able to plan.

UNHCR statistics show 67 million people were uprooted around the world at the end of 2007, 25 million of them because of natural disasters.

Johnstone said steps to limit greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to climate change would not be enough to prevent rising disasters or conflict over resources, which would hit the poorest people hardest.

"You can expect that as you have droughts, as you have scarcity of resources ... it will increase tensions and it will increase conflict," he said.

But plans could be made to deal with disasters because experts understood which areas of the world would likely be affected, he said.

Predicted global warming impacts include more intense storms hitting coastal areas in Asia and the Caribbean, and more frequent floods and droughts in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Milieunet

Yep and the longer we wait, how bigger the bill will be.

We need energysaving all over the world:

http://www.stichtingmilieunet.nl/energysavingtips.php

Every week a new cartoon and additional tips. Energysavings up to 28 percent. No investment.

0
Amitjha

Well cost is big issue for clean and green energy technology, atleast  till it does not competes with the oil.

1
Uwe Paschen

It will be more then that and the cost implication will by far exceed the Cost of preventive measures we could and should be taking now.

  

0
Amitjha

It is really strange that we still think in terms of monetry perspective, once we stop monetising the nature problem will be solved.See the economics of carbon trading (CMD) of kyoto protocol, how base less and discriminatoryu it is.


1
gerrypopplestone

The unwillingness of our so called leaders to get on with it and do what is needed:  unbelievable!

0
Amitjha

Well our so called leaders dont have vision to act , the are waiting for emergency situation so they can utilise that for their advantage.

we classify(divide) world according to our own need, but nature operates as whole , and do not know the national boundaries.Any DISTURBANCE in climatic cycle will disturb some part or the other. Forest fire in Australia interrupts the cycle of monsoon and millions suffer.


0
fastback

Maybe our leaders are not convinced that this is man made. Antartic ice grew as did the glaciers in Alaska. Polar ice caps on planets such as Mars shrank in recent years, are we to believe that humans caused that? In the 70`s it was all about the coming ice age now it`s warming caused by humans? This is nothing more than a money redistribution scheme by the U.N. to take from the rich countries in the form of carbon tax credits and give to the poor (they sell their tax credits ).

0
Amitjha

your point is not totally invalid, our geological history is full of several ice ages, but scientific data of increasig temperature cannot be ignored.

The green propaganda is valid to an extent if we consider the money involved in it, the carbon credit is already a $100 bn  industry, and projected to hit 200 by 2011.

0
dfaugust2k

~what we need to do is throw that foreigner, Alfred E Barak HUSSIAN Osama back out of his (ACORN -abetted ) pilfered office and bring Yimminy Carter -the peanut farmer back. At least when he was in office we were entering an ice-age, according to these same left-leaning lberal so-called scientists. BTW, Algore has a few carbon-credits for sale and he'll throw in the Brooklyn Bridge to the highest bidder! In the late 1800's it got so hot on this planet that in the mid and further west parts of the North American continent crop fields would spontaneously combust, these are all a part of nature's natural cycles, the democRATs' survival depends on how many morons they can get looking to the "Nanny-state" for all their needs, read a book.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Milieunet
First Flagged at 10:26 PM, Dec 8, 2008 by Milieunet
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Environment

Recommendations (16)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from