Climate Scientist Caught Fudging Data......Again

by JustMyOpinion | June 17, 2011 at 05:03 pm
154 views | 0 Recommendations | 2 comments

It looks as though more evidence is emerging showing the "save the planet" liberals are once again fudging data so as to show global warming is real. In 09' 1000;s of emails were leaked showing how so-called 'scientist' were fudging data so as to sell the hoax of the century by "hiding declines" in the earths temperatures and instead saying the temperatures were rising and blaming man.  Read HERE

Today it is being reported that climate scientist are now fudging sea-level data by adding 0.3 milliliters every year to their actual measurements."Gatekeepers of our sea level data are manufacturing a fictitious sea level rise that is not occurring," said James M. Taylor, a lawyer who focuses on environmental issues for the Heartland Institute. Read HERE 

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
TiredDem

The scientists involved have justified their additions by saying, first, they are compensating for the rise of the continents that were pushed down by the glaciers of the last ice-age which increases the water-holding capacity of the oceans; and, secondly, the additions are trivial and do not contaminate the measurements.

So, these brilliant scientists, responsible for being the watchdogs of all humanity to the danger of rising sea levels do not know the difference between "sea level" and "ocean volume".  That speaks volumes in my opinion.

And, I ask, if the addition of 0.3 mm is trivial and of no consequence to the validity of the measurements, why is it being added?  In actuality, the 0.3 mm represents a nearly 20% increase that doesn't actually exist; that doesn't seem so trivial to me.

This is just another case of liberal-elite academia pushing their agenda.  They have to justify their importance and the tens of millions of dollars we waste on their grants, speaker fees, and trips to Cancun Resorts for global summits.  And then there's also the possibility that they have followed Al Gore into filling their retirement porfolios with "green" investments; and are worried that they may not be able to continue their snobbish, wine and cheese party, international travelling lifestyles into retirement if the rest of us don't get the government to pour billions into all of those green-tech companies to save mankind.

1
The 1

The simple truth is, global warming or climate change from certain types of pollution can occur. Whether some choose to believe it or not is really irrelevant. Those rebuttals to scientific reports actually fudge the data. Scientific reporting is a revolving process, subject to change and in constant flux. There really is no exact scientific process for or about climate change and global warming. It's not mean't to be that way. It's can only be predictive and adaptive in nature. Think of it maybe as 'predictive analytics'.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from