Conservation Group Fighting to Protect the Pacific Walrus

by josiemitchell | December 4, 2008 at 10:40 am
224 views | 7 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Walruses in Arctic

Walruses in Arctic

see larger image

uploaded by commonwealth.club

Back in February, The Center for Biological Diversity filed a scientific petition to include the Pacific Walrus in the Endangered Species Act, insuring that the animal would receive more protection in the face of the walrus' deteriorating habitat. The deadline to respond to the petition was May 8th. They're a little late, so now the group is suing the Federal Government in order to demand that the Pacific Walrus be included in the Endangered Species Act.

The Center for Biological Diversity sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne on Wednesday for failing to act on a petition seeking protection for walruses under the Endangered Species Act.

Walruses are threatened by global warming that melts Arctic sea ice, according to the group, one of the parties that successfully petitioned to list polar bears as threatened. The group also has filed petitions to protect Arctic seals.

The walrus petition was filed in February. The Fish and Wildlife Service was required by law to decide by May 8 whether the petition had merit, which would trigger a more thorough review and a preliminary decision after 12 months. The agency missed the deadline.

Rebecca Noblin, an attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, said the delay would harm walruses.

"Every day that goes by without protecting the walrus, we're emitting more greenhouse gases, accelerating the ice melt," Noblin said.

"In addition to the climate change, the other main threat is oil and gas development that continues to go forward without any consultation regarding walrus," she said.

Fish and Wildlife spokesman Bruce Woods said Wednesday the agency anticipates making a decision on the petition soon but has limited resources. Decisions on endangered species listings are driven by litigation, he said, forcing the agency to rank actions by court order rather than species need.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Paschen

Yes, well I do believe that there resources are limited in deed, since all the Federal Money went into Wars Budgets and now into Bail outs of all sorts other then what actually will have a real and long term impact, being the environment.

  Thank you for the Post.

1
Fairbanks
other main threat is oil and gas development
. . . Plenty of coal there, but development of coal in Alaska is nearly frozen already

0
Paschen

Good Point broth up here Fairbanks. Thanks.

0
hunky

Several headless walrus washed up on the area beaches in late summer 2007. It was my understanding that as many as 80 had washed up in the area (includes many miles of beach). I also understood that it was under the investigation of our state fish and game authorities, but I never heard the outcome.

hunky has contributed a photo to this story.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Paschen
First Flagged at 10:51 AM, Dec 4, 2008 by Paschen
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Environment

Recommendations (7)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from