NP Rank:
The cost of pollution, not only a matter of dollars. Lives too
By, Uwe Paschen.
A study conducted by the London-based consultancy Trucost, which is due to be published this summer, found that the combined damage of only the world's 3000 biggest companies was worth US $2.2 trillion in 2008 alone. This is a figure bigger than the national economies of all but seven countries in the world for that year.
Would those companies have to pay for the damage they cause, they would have to disburse the equivalent of one third of their profits to do so.
The report on the economics of climate change by Sir Nicholas Stern is trying to put an accurate price tag on the damage inflicted unto the environment and find suggestion to prevent it as well. Wile the report, led by economist Pavan Sukhdev, suggest the abolition of all subsidies to harmful industries like agriculture, energy and transport, all the wile asking for tougher laws and higher taxes on polluting industries to stop the trend and enforce the much needed changes.
This of course may have some serious consequences and will affect not only on the customers and the companies profits, more so it will affect labour laws and pension plans all the same, as the UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment report does suggest.
Centuries of mismanagement and abuse seem to come back to hunt us now with a revenge and a very high price tag as well. Failing to act will not only increase the sub sequential price tag to fix it. But, any further delay would make the task exponentially harder to achieve, allowing to reverse or rather limit the damage and the disaster that will come along with it, whose price tag can not even be estimated for it is simply to high to fathom.
Sukhdev told the annual Earthwatch Oxford lecture last week.
"The world's extinction crisis continues in 2010, the United Nations International Year of Biodiversity. As humans, we have the power to protect nature or destroy it. As this lecture will demonstrate, we must urgently explore all the ways in which we can preserve and protect life on earth. After all, biodiversity is crucial to providing us all with health, food, fuel, wealth and the vital services on which our lives depend."
Ceres, an investors and environmentalist lobby group with over 80 funds and assets exceeding eight trillion dollar US, Is estimating that those environmental changes that are desperately needed will cost North America alone over 20,000 jobs and over one billion dollar a year just to agricultural companies due to water shortages in California and other areas.
Our pollution is not only starting to cost us dearly, in addition, the price keeps increasing the longer we wait to act with some serious intentions and methods. Sadly, the price tag in human lives keeps on increasing as well with each day we waste. This not only in numbers of jobs being lost or in reduction in pension plans or health care programs, but in real lives that will be inevitably sacrifices and lost. The numbers will exceed the hundreds of millions worldwide and maybe even worth. Much could still be saved and avoided would we have changed by now, sadly we have not rely tried so far.
http://www.earthwatch.org/europe/newsroom/news_events/news-5-sukhdev.html
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
PIM of SPAIN
San Pedro de A, Malaga, Spain
Recommendations (49)
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
hussain
All Places, Pakistan -
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
Paul Conneally
Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
-
Barbara McPherson
Nanaimo, Canada -
Tomitheos Linardos
Toronto, Ontario, Canada -
Caoimhin1
Dunshaggin, Ireland -
Sputnic
London, United Kingdom -
Mary Richard
Toronto, Canada







Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (10)
at 09:56 on February 19th, 2010
Good piece, I agree that it's not just money at stake here.
at 09:59 on February 19th, 2010
A big problem Uwe.
Humans don't want to face the consequences of truly cutting back, cheap flights, big cars, big TVs, washing and drying machines, dishwashers, street lighting.....the list is endless, luxuries nobody will give up without a fight.
For what is achieved at climate summits, they would all help far more by staying at home instead of world leaders and their crowds of minions jetting all over the place, a nice jolly for them all, but with no end result.
And there needn't be job losses, jobs can be created by finding and using renewable energy supplies.
at 11:51 on February 19th, 2010
Good story - lots to consider here.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
J2B (not verified)at 18:08 on February 19th, 2010
well, according to Richard Branson of the Virgin type, within 5 years, the world will run out of oil, which if true, and I don't know if it is, will be a great improvement. I guess people will go back to pulling their cars by horses, water buffalo, or somethin'?
at 21:32 on February 19th, 2010
A very good piece indeed! Nobody can/should dare to disagree.
at 04:27 on February 20th, 2010
I'm all for going all natural.
Let us go back to using livestock (horses, oxen, camels, etc.) to move us from place to place.
We can have wagons delivering our food and goods.
We can go back to the good old days! Like New York City in 1900, in the good old days when 10,000 horses a day died, and the air was filled with the aroma of horse manure, and the sewers were filled with the rats that feasted on the dead horses.
Ah, it was a wonderland, it was!!!!
at 03:01 on February 21st, 2010
Dont need to go back, but do you really need that latest mobile phone or the latest tv ? What about all the unnecesasy packaging in the supermarket ?
at 20:25 on February 22nd, 2010
great write up Uwe, well done
- Sign In or Join to post comments
steve1 (not verified)at 10:10 on March 13th, 2010
The far-right people aren't getting it. It's about toxic chemicals pumped into the environment in the millions of tons. It has an effect on the environment and destroys the ecosystem. Too many people talk about global warming and whether it's a myth or not. What can't be denied is that all these harmful chemicals going into the air, water, soil, etc. destroy the environment and cars, refineries, and factories are pumping it in. The "Global warming debate" is a distraction from what pollution is doing to the environment. It can't be debated.
at 09:41 on March 21st, 2010
Every child should have the cautionary tale of King Midas read to them.