NP Rank:
Energy silver bullet is deadly
Nuke is not the answer
While vested nuclear advocates will fight for the opportunity to build more nuclear power plants, even when they know there is no safe answer to disposing of waste, and even when the risks are quite apparent, the scientific and engineering community must rack their brains for better solutions.
In fact, solutions are as apparent as the nuclear downside itself.
The United States could have all the power it needs from blanketing large areas of sun filled southwest with solar power collectors. Europe could have all the energy it needs by contracting with Middle Eastern countries to blanket vast areas of desert with solar power collectors.
The latter would replace sources of revenue lost to depleting fossil fuels.
The electric power distribution and storage business could be a magnificent boom to the global economy.
Changes in transportation power from petrol to electronics will transform personal transportation.
Areas that are right for wind power generation can install fields of turbines, adding power to the grid. Tides are ripe for exploiting tidal power generation.
The only thing blocking the solutions is vested interests in the wrong answer. Revolt against nuclear power, and clamor for the right voltage.
“Some 200,000 in Germany protest nuclear power
BERLIN — Tens of thousands of people on Saturday turned out in Germany's largest cities to protest the use of nuclear power in the wake of Japan's Fukushima reactor disaster, police and organizers said.
In Berlin alone more than 100,000 took to the capital's streets to urge Germany's leaders to immediately abolish nuclear power, police spokesman Jens Berger said.
Organizers said some 250,000 people marched at the "Fukushima Warns: Pull the Plug on all Nuclear Power Plants" rallies in the country's four largest cities, making them the biggest anti-nuclear protest in the country's history.
"We can no longer afford bearing the risk of a nuclear catastrophe," Germany's environmental lobby group BUND said.
The disaster at Japan's Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear facility triggered Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservative government last week to order a temporary shut down of seven of the country's older reactors pending thorough safety investigations. Officials have since hinted several of them might never go back into service.
Protesters shouted "Fukushima, Chernobyl: Too much is too much!" or "Switch them off," urging the government to shut down the country's 17 reactors for good. They also held a minute of silence to remember the victims of Japan's March 11 earthquake and tsunami.
In the northern port city of Hamburg some 40,000 turned out and more than 30,000 were on the streets in southern Munich, police said. Cologne police did not provide a figure and referred to the organizer's estimate of 40,000 protesters.
BUND, in turn, said some 120,000 turned out in Berlin, 50,000 in Hamburg and 40,000 in Cologne and Munich each.
Saturday's turnout easily topped rallies last April following safety incidents at a northern German nuclear power plant near Hamburg that had seen 140,000 people taking to the streets, BUND spokesman Thorben Becker said.
Nuclear power has been very unpopular in Germany ever since radioactivity from the 1986 Chernobyl disaster drifted across the country.
A center-left government a decade ago penned a plan to abandon the technology for good by 2021, but Merkel's government last year amended it to extend the plants' lifetime by an average of 12 years. In a complete U-turn, the government has now put that plan on hold.
The cascade of failures at Japan's Fukushima plant has reignited the political debate on the use of nuclear power in Germany, Europe's biggest economy, and many opposition lawmakers have called to shut down all reactors even before 2020.
Germany — which stands alone among the wold's leading industrialized nations in its determination to overcome nuclear power — currently gets some 23 percent of its energy supply from its reactors, 17 percent from renewable energies, 13 percent from natural gas and more than 40 percent from coal. The Environment Ministry maintains that renewable energy will be able to contribute 40 percent of the country's overall electricity production in 10 years.”






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 14:54 on March 27th, 2011
Tired of hearing it?
at 20:19 on April 7th, 2011
The IAEA is in tight collusion with the nuclear industry, in fact their very birth was the intent to function as a propaganda machine for the industry. They took on non proliferation efforts to give the appearance of caring about the public's safety- when in reality they did so just so they could further reduce the chances of any horrible black eyes.
The man who was in charge of the whole cleanup effort after Chernobyl has deeply criticized the IAEA and WHO for a whitewash and coverup of its true cost- and indeed every time a credible report comes out trying to reveal the truth, so called "scientists" acting as shills for the nuclear industry come out and try to silence them.
What makes this difficult is that the epidemology on this is still very new and unreasearched, and the cancers it causes take years to develop and can be blamed by those in denial, on other things.
If it weren't for people putting this blind trust in nuclear power because the industry wages an intense disinformation campaign, other sources such as solar, wind, geothermal and tidal, would be better funded and thus more advanced.
at 02:27 on April 8th, 2011
Supervision should not come from an agency with "atomic" in its name.
at 03:23 on April 8th, 2011
Have you ever seen the arguments declaring nuclear power is safer than say, hydroelectric, which point to deaths caused by dam projects when they burst after typhoons and the like? (comparing them to their rigged Chernobyl figures)
They seem to forget that hydro power is usually not the primary reason the need for the dam came along. (three gorges likely an exception, though it replaces smaller dams built for flood control)
In china in particular the dams were for just that, flood control.
Other examples will try to compare coal miner deaths (people who volunteer for that line of work) with the children of Belarussia who have an alarming rate of thyroid cancer.
I'm pretty sure they didn't volunteer to have fallout all around them.
I saw one the other day trying to extract how many deaths from rooftop falls in the roofing industry they could possibly attribute to installing solar panels, using very "bad science" in their statistics. (as the field of solar panel installation is not yet large enough for fatal incident compilation on its own by the dept of labor)
Needless to say this person did not attempt to extract how many construction worker deaths he could attribute to the building of nuclear power plants over the years, and even demurred on counting the three dead (one impaled on a spike in the ceiling, his corpse hanging for three days I believe) in a ~1960 Idaho National Laboratory reactor explosion because that reactor was merely experimental.
(their bodies buried in solid lead coffins)
at 20:21 on April 7th, 2011