Exxon Valdez Oil Spill 1989, Gulf Of Mexico 2010: A Comparison

by NowPublic Staff | April 29, 2010 at 09:27 am
15136 views | 27 Recommendations | 14 comments

Videos

The Exxon Valdez Disaster: 20 Years Later

see larger video

sourced by NowPublic Staff

The Exxon Valdez Disaster: 20 Years Later

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill 1989 vs Oil Spill Gulf Of Mexico 2010

With oil still spewing into the Gulf of Mexico and the clean up effort being hampered by the weather, comparisons are starting to be made between the Gulf Oil Spill of 2010 and the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill of 1989.

But in reality it is too early to make a completely accurate comparison, simply because the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico has not reached the shores of Mississippi or Louisiana - it is an ongoing disaster whereas the Exxon spill occurred 21 years ago.

So the environmental impact is difficult to determine without the benefit of time.

What can be looked at is the volume and quantities of oil spilling into the Gulf of Mexico and compare that to what happened with the Exxon Valdez in 1989.

Oil Spill Gulf of Mexico 2010

The oil spill started last week after an explosion, fire and subsequent sinking of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig. The rig located about 80 miles off the coast of Louisiana started leaking about 5,000 barrels a day.


If the leak cannot be contained in time, it would mean 4.2 million gallons of oil, or 100,000 barrels would spill in to the Gulf before a relief well can be drilled according to the Houston Chronicle.

Containment crews have had some success but unfavorable winds and the tides have now pushed the oil to 12 miles off the coast line.

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill 

The Exxon Valdez oil spill occurred in Alaska's Prince William Sound on March 24th 1989. It is considered one of the worst human triggered environmental disasters ever. In terms of amount of oil spilled it outranks the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.


The vessel spilled 10.8 million U.S. gallons (about 40 million litres, or 250,000 barrels) of Prudhoe Bay crude oil into the sea, and the oil eventually covered 1,300 square miles (3,400 km2) of ocean.

Oil Spill Gulf of Mexico 2010: Environmental Damage

Though it is still too early to determine the exact environment damage of the Gulf Oil Spill, if the oil reaches the shore unfettered then here is what could happen. Fisheries, Birdlife, and Tourism would be severely impacted. In terms of fish, the Atlantic Blue Fin Tuna could be hit hard, an already critically endangered species.

We expect a spill like this could dramatically decrease the amount of bluefin tuna larvae that are surviving," said John Hocevar, the Oceans Campaign director for Greenpeace USA.


Losses could also be inflicted on the shrimp and oyster industries in Louisiana. Oysters are filter feeders and cannot swim to escape the slick. The prime oyster-gathering season in Louisiana starts on May 1.

Birds, especially in the Chandeleur and Breton barrier islands in Louisiana could be very vulnerable.


"It's already a fragile system. It would be devastating to see anything happen to that system," said Mark Kulp, a University of New Orleans geologist.

Oil makes it difficult for birds to fly or float on the water's surface. Plant life can also suffer serious harm.

Tourism could be hit hard if the oil reaches the beautiful beaches of the Gulf Coast - oil slicked sand is clearly not a tourist draw.

Exxon Valdez Environmental Damage

The environmental damages caused the Exxon Valdez oil spill are still being felt 21 years after the oil started spilling into Prince William Sound - environmental damage inflicted, partly because of the clean up challenge in Alaska was more extreme than it is in the Gulf of Mexico.

The remote location of Prince William Sound, the unfavorable weather, the rocky coves, and many say the slow response of Exxon in cleaning up the spill all made the environmental disaster even worse.


Thousands of animals died immediately; the best estimates include 100,000 to as many as 250,000 seabirds, at least 2,800 sea otters, approximately 12 river otters, 300 harbor seals, 247 bald eagles, and 22 orcas, as well as the destruction of billions of salmon and herring eggs.

Now, 20 decades after the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill scientists say they found a bio-marker (CYP1A) for oil in ducks is abnormally high in the populations in the area of the Exxon Valdez Spill.


"We found (the ducks') CYP1A levels were unequivocally higher in areas oiled by the Exxon Valdez spill than in nearby areas, a conclusion supported by multiple samples and two independent laboratories," SFU wildlife scientist Daniel Esler said in a release.

BP the company that owns the oil that is spilling into the Gulf has been working with the coast guard to contain the spill. So far it seems BP has not been slammed for its clean up efforts. BP has been spending about $6 million a day to clean up the spill.


BP’s response has been aggressive so far. The oil company has sent more than 1,000 personnel, 32 ships and five planes to deal with the spill.

The open question is exactly how much oil is spilled BP says it is not 5,000 barrels a day (250,000 gallons), claiming that 5,000 barrels is the upper limit.


“I would say the range is 1,000 to 5,000 barrels a day,” Doug Suttles, BP’s chief operating officer for exploration and production, said.

His remarks followed the discovery of a third leak at the site of last week’s explosion, which led the US Government’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to increase its estimate of the amount of oil spilled into the ocean to 5,000 barrels of oil a day.

The final question is what will the weather do? The  weather seems to have turned and now the prevailing winds and tides seem pushing the oil toward the shore and so the clean up efforts become even more time sensitive and crucial.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Hannah M*****

This is a horrible tragety. Something needs to be done to immediatly stop the oil from the gulf of Mexico.

1
Bobby G********* (not verified)

how are they going to plug the well 

1
Kayzin S*******

They can't just plug up the oil. They have already tried that and it didn't work so they are going to try and put a house like structure or a cap to put over the pipe that is leaking all of the oil and then it will have a pipe that will run down and they will drain the oil out of the oil pocket completely into another oil tanker. If this works then they can get busy on cleaning up the oil and making sure that it doesn't get to the coast line.

2
T H CRAWFORD

Here's the real situation - the money hungry oil companies are only concerned about selling oil and not how to clean up oil spills.  They have several methods of getting the oil out of the ground (under water), but very few methods of how to contain and/or stop a spill.It should be mandatory for the oil companies to have several ways of containing oil spills that the cost is NOT passed on to the consumer if they want to stay in business.People, animals and the environment can not sustain these disasters without IMMEDIATE clean up procedures.IF the world ends on Dec 21, 2012 - it won't be by natural causes.  It will be man made - oil spills, terrorists, etc.

2
mike jones

this is a bunch of horse shit and dont belive it

1
libby spears

Without oil, we would not be typing our comments into web browsers on the internet.  Our way of life, the medical miracles that save the lives of loved ones, the gas for our cars, and the plastics for our plasma TV's all depend on oil.  Yet all the naive nature nerds can do is run in circles like chicken little.  They are the ones, that voted for the worst finger pointing bitter politician to ever serve as America's president.  I just wonder, and today is May 17, 2010, if in two weeks, six months, and 10 years if all the predicted disaster will just be hot air, just like Al Gore's hockey stick, which has been proven to be false.

1
Piercec

You hit the nail on the head!  I couldn't agree more.

2
crissy a .

true that . BP has only been thinking about making their money off of this oil and not on the enviromental impact of this spill. our naive and negative ways has cost us and now we all do not know what to do about. i say they grow some balls and actually do something to stop this. how is throwing concrete and litter into this well will stop this ? hmm. . well there goes the economy lmao:)

1
michael l.

what is lmao ? lol . but shes right.  

1
Joe Conway

Use this debacle to change the course of this country to production of solar on every roof top in the nation.  This is the leadership we have longed for and thought we were voting for with Obama.  No excuses let the petroleum tax fund the clean up and restoration.  While the money we save from ending these pointless wars should be put into retooling our energy sources. "SOLAR ON every rooftop NOW!"  Take the lead back from Germany in solar.  We had it before the W error.

1
mike fn d

gail swallows

1
mike fn d

:]

1
Ann Philip

Planetresource.net  has a Eco friendly solution to clean up the tragedy British Petroleum has created, please watch the video animation: www.youtube.com/watch?v=60bdQQQ3iVw  and pass this along to as many people as you know. One person can still make a difference in this world, is that simple interactions have a rippling effect. Each time this gets pass along, the hope in cleaning our planet is passed on.

1
BonnyLu

Ironic. I sit here in my home and worry how I am going to pay my energy bill for myself and my son, before they rush and shut it down. No kiddin. I will die in this heat, I cant pay it. Maybe the solution for BP is to send bill collectors. 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Amy Judd
First Flagged at 10:38 AM, Apr 29, 2010 by Amy Judd
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (27)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from