NP Rank:
Fluid World is Creating Growing Inequality: Warning Social Unrest Next
The past 10 years has seen the largest move in human history from the rural world, to the urban world. Whole new cities have popped up in countries like China, where there had not been any 20 years ago. Few countries have planned for this move well.
The result has been the growth of urban and so-called peri-urban (fringe) areas around the world's cities. These sprawling and often slum-like zones are home to great human misery. They suffer from high crime, high sickness rates, crowded conditions and a polluted environment. Well documented in Mike Davis' book, Planet of Slums, these areas are so worrying, the US Pentagon has launched a major strategy to develop methods to keep the peace.
As Davis points out in his book, "Thus, the cities of the future, rather than being made out of glass and steel as envisioned by earlier generations of urbanists, are instead largely constructed out of crude brick, straw, recycled plastic, cement blocks, and scrap wood. Instead of cities of light soaring toward heaven, much of the twenty-first century urban world squats in squalor, surrounded by pollution, excrement, and decay."
But this surge in income and social inequality is not confined to the developing world. As a new report has found, it is happening right now in the major cities of the Western World. In the past 15 years, Western governments have turned to the property market to generate wealth and tax revenues. The so-called 'double bubble' encouraged by governments with low interest rates and loose lending, has had the consequence of further dividing cities along income lines. A city like New York is a prime example: it has the high contrast population of extreme poverty and extraordinary wealth.
The report believes this situation cannot go on forever: that the pressure and anger this situation breeds will eventually spill over into social unrest and violence. We have been living in a limbo period, but one that will not stay this way for much longer.
There are positive solutions out there. These include making housebuilding easy and safe with modular kits, involving the local communities in innovating how they are living, and bringing dignity and beauty to places overlooked by governments and conventional city planners.
Wealth gap creating a social time bomb• Race behind division in US cities, says UN report
• Beijing is most egalitarian place in the world
- The Guardian,
- Thursday October 23 2008
- Article history
Growing inequality in US cities could lead to widespread social unrest and increased mortality, says a new United Nations report on the urban environment.
In a survey of 120 major cities New York was found to be the ninth most unequal in the world and Atlanta, New Orleans, Washington, and Miami had similar inequality levels to those of Nairobi, Kenya and Abidjan, Ivory Coast. Many were above an internationally recognised acceptable "alert" line used to warn governments.
"High levels of inequality can lead to negative social, economic and political consequences that have a destabilising effect on societies," said the report. "[They] create social and political fractures that can develop into social unrest and insecurity."
According to the annual State of the World's cities report from UN-Habitat, race is one of the most important factors determining levels of inequality in the US and Canada.
"In western New York state nearly 40% of the black, Hispanic and mixed-race households earned less than $15,000 compared with 15% of white households. The life expectancy of African-Americans in the US is about the same as that of people living in China and some states of India, despite the fact that the US is far richer than the other two countries," it said.
Disparities of wealth were measured on the "Gini co-efficient", an internationally recognised measure usually only applied to the wealth of countries. The higher the level, the more wealth is concentrated in the hands of fewer people.
"It is clear that social tension comes from inequality. The trickle down theory [that wealth starts with the rich] has not delivered. Inequality is not good for anybody," said Anna Tibaijuka, head of UN-Habitat, in London yesterday.
The report found that India was becoming more unequal as a direct result of economic liberalisation and globalisation, and that the most unequal cities were in South Africa and Namibia and Latin America. "The cumulative effect of unequal distribution [of wealth] has been a deep and lasting division between rich and poor. Trade liberalisation did not bring about the expected benefits."
The report suggested that Beijing was now the most egalitarian city in the world, just ahead of cities such as Jakarta in Indonesia and Dire Dawa in Ethiopia.
In Europe, which was generally more egalitarian than other continents, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Slovenia were classed as the most equal countries with Greece, the UK and Spain among the least. "Disparities are particularly significant in the cities of eastern Europe, larger Spanish cities and in the north of England," it said.
It documents the seemingly unstoppable move of people away from rural to urban areas. This year it is believed that the number of people living in urban areas exceeded those in the countryside for the first time ever, but the report says there is no sign of the trend slowing.
"The dramatic transition between rural and urban communities is not over. Urbanisation levels will rise dramatically in the next 40 years to reach 70% by 2050," it predicts.
The most dramatic urbanisation has been taking place in China, with many millions of people moving from the countryside to cities. The report says 49 new cities have been built in the past 18 years. The rapid transition to an urban society has brought great wealth but also many negative results.
"China has attained some of the deepest disparities in the world with urban incomes three times those in rural areas. Inequalities are growing, with disproportionate rewards for the most skilled workers ... and serious problems for the unemployed and informal workers."
Urban growth rates are highest in the developing world, which absorbs an average 5 million new urban residents a month and is responsible for 95% of world urban growth. The report predicts that Asian cities will grow the most in the next 40 years and could have 63% of the world urban population by 2050.
Tokyo is expected to remain the world's largest mega city, with 36.4m people by 2025. But Mexico City, New York, and Sao Paulo could give way in the league table to Mumbai, Delhi and Dhaka. Kinshasa and Lagos are the two African cities expected to grow the most, with each adding more than 6 million people by 2025.
Rather than countryside to city movement, which has marked rapid population growth in the last 40 years, the UN expects more people to move from city to city.
Capital cities in particular are attracting much more of countries' investments and are growing fast. Some are becoming home to nearly half a country's population.
But the report also identified what it believes is the emergence of a new urban trend, with many cities now shrinking in size. The populations of 46 countries, including Germany, Italy, Japan and most former soviet states, are expected to be smaller in 2050 than they are now, and in the past 30 years, says the report, more cities in the developed world have shrunk than grown.
It found that 49 cities in the UK, including Liverpool and other old industrial centres in the north of England, and 100 in Russia reduced in size between 1990 and 2000, mainly because of unemployment. In the US 39 cities are smaller now than they were 10 years ago.
The reasons for the decline of cities was mostly economic, but the report says that the environment is now an important factor.
Air quality and pollution from mines, power plants and oil exploration have been responsible for population losses in India, Mexico and Africa, it says. "Cities tend to struggle most with health-threatening environmental issues, such as the lack of safe water, sanitation and waste."
Crowd Power
-
Hopenow
New York, New York, United States






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 02:47 on October 23rd, 2008
Hopenow, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 03:27 on October 23rd, 2008
Hopenow, I like this story. It's good stuff. Please use Highlighter tool to link the Guardian article. You have just copied and pasted.
at 07:05 on October 23rd, 2008
You mention a US pentagon strategy: Im not sure how the US telling the rest of the world what to do can help! Im a bit sceptical about the UN Habitat since I read about their own failed attempts to provide housing in Africa! Also, Im a bit worried with their assumption that it is possible to compare inequalities across cities in the world. Im just not sure there is such reliable and accuraste data available. Maybe if you ignore the difficulties of ensuring that everyone is included. But I think the use of the Gini coefficient is a step forward: many analysts including Polly Toynbee (of the Guardian) simply ignore proper statistical analysis and look just at the xtremes which can be highly misleading. My impression is that housing was completely ignored in the UN Development Goals. And the use of the word is highly emotive really. We have a very rough estimate of the extent of people living without adequate sanitation (Rose George's new book - A Basic Necessity is excellent on this) but the numbers without "adequate" housing is a lot more difficult to define since standards and needs vary enormously. In Mumbai, the authorities have been grappling with this issues for many years. Land values have risen so much that the large shanty town Dharavi now stands on very valuable land. Yet many of its inhabitants do not want to move away from the area since it is vital for access to their work.
The diagram you use is interesting. But I have seen others (from Lester Brown) that show very different end results. He points out that housing experts are doing nothing to tackle the populatioon explosion that is occurring in many countries.
at 10:17 on October 23rd, 2008
Until the poor in the world take control of their birth rate, they will know poverty and misery. No matter how quickly the world's ability to provide increases, the poor outstrip the pace by failure to control family size. The reduction in family size in poor hemispheres, continents, countries, regions, demographics and households should be the number one priority of anyone wanting to battle poverty, war, global warming, environmental damage, low wages, crime, starvation, disease, HIV and a host of other social ills.
at 10:29 on October 23rd, 2008
While we all know of some examples of poor families with clearly far too many children such examples are not so widespread. Most families, real numbers, control their family size to the local, cultural standard.