NP Rank:
The Future of the Port Mann Bridge
The biggest concern regarding the new bridge is the cost. The estimated final cost is $3.3 billion which will be paid for with a $3 toll each way. Many people are worried about “the price of convenience” with this toll (Future Port Mann Bridge, 2009). Some also argue that the government should spend money on improving and enlarging transit instead of spending money on a new bridge.
While these are valid concerns, I support construction of the new Port Mann Bridge. The $3 toll is rather high, especially for regular commuters. However, the toll is not applicable to those who do not use the bridge. It serves more as a targeted tax for those who make use of the bridge. Additionally, there is a possibility that the toll will not be permanent since it may be lowered after several years as the bridge is paid for. It is also important to realize that most other larger communities do not have ‘free’ bridges like all the other bridges throughout Vancouver.
In response to those that argue against the bridge and for transit improvements, the new Port Mann Bridge will actually benefit public transit. The bridge will have ‘fast bus’ lanes in both directions, providing bus service on the Port Mann for the first time in 20 years. These fast bus lanes will have the capability to be converted to rapid transit in the future – this would not have been possible if the bridge was twinned as originally planned (Future Port Mann Bridge, 2009). Hence, the bridge will greatly increase the speed of public transit. Furthermore, if people take public transit, they will not have to pay the toll, thus promoting a greener environment.
A major advantage to constructing a new bridge instead of twinning the original is that the current Port Mann Bridge is 45 years old and will cost about $180 million to maintain (Single 10-lane bridge to replace Port Mann, 2009). After the new bridge is completed, the old one will be taken down, saving taxpayers’ money in maintenance.
Overall, building the new bridge is a huge project with high costs, giving many people good reasons to criticize it. However, I believe the benefits of the final product will outweigh the costs since it will solve traffic congestion problems, reduce travel time and reduce harmful emissions.
References
(2009, February 4). Single 10-lane bridge to replace Port Mann. CBC. Retrieved March 17, 2009, from http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2009/02/04/bc-new-port-mann-bridge.html#socialcomments
Slobogean, T. (2009, February 5). Future Port Mann Bridge: Drivers not thrilled about toll. News1130. Retrieved March 17, 2009, from http://www.news1130.com/news/local/more.jsp?content=20090204_173159_38340
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
TimGjernes
Surrey, Canada





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 08:34 on March 18th, 2009
Very interesting Tim, but if they build this bridge with a $3 toll then I really feel for the daily commuters, $6/day can really add up. Maybe they should come up with a monthly pass at a discount rate?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
TheGreg (not verified)at 19:55 on April 29th, 2009
I am a daily commuter and based on a $6/day toll and how many taime I would be using the Bridge per year my cost would be $1500-$2000/yr. You can times that by 2 as my wife also needs to cross 5 days a week at a seperate time. This $3-$4000.00 Annual cost would force us to cancel any extra family expendatures, vacation ect... I think that this way too much. I am sure that thousands of people are in the same position as me and are equally outraged. Does anybody know where I can get more details.. Possible toll discouts for residance, or a max amount per mounth/year? Will the toll be permenant if not what is the plan/timeline? Looks to me that my only options will be 1) Leave home extra early and drive around just to get stuck in the gridlock of others in my position. 2) Buy a smaller home for more money on the east side of the bridge. 3) Look for a new Job. 4) Try to leave Canada... Hey, I love my Country and think that it is very beutiful, but the way that the Government rakes it's tax payers over the coals in every area makes our Country no so beautiful in my eyes!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Snd Spo (not verified)at 08:41 on May 21st, 2009
http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20090204/bc_port_mann_090204?hub=BritishColumbiaSpecialEvent4
It looks like the toll could be around for $40 years. And it also appears that there is a possibility the toll could go up, and reality is, if the government knows they can raise the price; they will.
My husband crosses the bridge 5 days a week for work and I am livid at the cost. I understand that change needs to happen with our roadways, but $6 a day is an absolute JOKE. And how will we know when the bridge is paid off? How will we know when the toll is going into the pockets of the government, and not for the bridge?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
cmk6at 11:30 on March 19th, 2009
Ah, thats cool. At least there will be less traffic jam during rush hour when its done.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
bqtl (not verified)at 05:18 on April 18th, 2009
You're wrong cmk6. less traffic jam? i dont think so. you have to wait in line to pay for toll to cross the bridge!
at 09:52 on April 18th, 2009
Actually you won't need to wait in line. The tolling system will be automatic. I'm not exactly sure how it will work, but it will 'know' your car and charge you automatically, so there should be no lineups and less traffic jams.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Hyprodimus Primeat 20:51 on March 19th, 2009
We debated the twinning of the Port Mann a few years ago and I had to go to open houses for both sides. I picked the twin side. The 10 lane bridge looks to be a better approach. I think it will encourage growth in the area. It used to be an issue that if you build a bigger infrastructure, it will only get filled and you will require a bigger one, like in LA. If you look at it the other way, thats the cost of growth. Cities wouldnt be here without the roads we have today. Roads are important because not everyone can take transit to where they are going.