Governments Around the Globe Ban Meat

by LilHoody | May 11, 2009 at 11:22 pm
567 views | 70 Recommendations | 16 comments

Photos

The death of a Seal | Photo 02

The death of a Seal | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by LilHoody

Britain will be totally vegetarian within this century

In a move to ensure our Earth is free and safe, Governments around the world are taking steps to eradicate meat. British parliament are taking serious action in stopping meat production and livestock farming due to many health and environmental dangers. In a recent report, it has highlighted that Britain will be meat free by the turn of the century.

The European Union is also voicing its concerns.

European Union (EU) agreed to a legally binding protocol that commits the EU and its member states to ""pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals."" When formulating and implementing community policies on agriculture, transport, research and internal trade, the EU is now formally committed to recognize that animals are living creatures capable of feeling pain and fear. They are fully capable, too, of enjoying themselves when well treated. Their well-being, therefore, is covered under the EU's sentient beings rubric.

And now, the EU is implementing the ban of sea life slaughtering.

“Today’s vote in the European Parliament marks a historic victory inthe campaign to stop the commercial slaughter of seals around the world,”said Mark Glover, director of Humane Society International/UK. “TheEuropean Union has acted on behalf of its citizens, and its decision willsave millions of seals from a horrible fate.”
 
“The European Union has made history by ending its trade in seal products,” said Rebecca Aldworth, director of Humane Society International/Canada. “This ban spells the beginning of the end of Canada’s globally condemned seal slaughter.”

The EU is also implimenting ban on factgory farmed animals, with an intorduction of a full ban on battery caged hens.

A ban on the use of barren battery cages within the EU is due to be brought into force in January 2012



I don't understand, governments around the world are banning meat, factory farming and slaughtering - yet Humans still consume it. Why? Actually, I don't want to know - the apathy of the Human race is one thing working agianst it in a race to save the Earth.
Though, now it seems the Human will be forced to stop consuming meat. Epidemics and pandemics spreading around the globe such as the swine flu may very well force meat consumption.

The Earth has experienced many diseases, and witnessed many pandemics in the wake of the meat industry. It wasn't too long ago that they went through mad cows disease, now the world is having to deal with swine flu.

And it is all due to people consuming meat, and factory farming.

It is believed that the farms, operated by Granjas Carroll, polluted the atmosphere and local water bodies, which in turn led to the disease outbreak. According to residents, the company denied responsibility for the outbreak and attributed the cases to “flu.” However, a municipal health official stated that preliminary investigations indicated that the disease vector was a type of fly that reproduces in pig waste and that the outbreak was linked to the pig farms.

And all this, for what - A piece of bacon on your plate. This is a health issue that is real, and the outcome is real. By you making the choice not to eat meat, even for one day would have beautiful ramifications for the Earth - and for your health.

Though it is not just Britian leading the way - it is a real possibility that the US will ban factory farming due to the recent swine flu outbreak.

Given these serious public health concerns, a number of health and safety organizations have called for limits or a ban on factory farmed animals, including the American Public Health Association, American Medical Association, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Union of Concerned Scientists.

These are leading scientist, medical practitioners and politicians in the US calling for this. Previously leading a vegetarian life, and people calling for a stop to animal destruction were labeled as 'hippies'. But no longer, that stereo-type is gone, and it's place a professionals, educated, very intelligent members of our society calling for a stop to meat eating.

Heed the calls, read the reports, and take your own action. Why be followers when we can be leaders. Cherish all life, and you will reap the rewards.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
4
Iffy

The age of massive meat eating is coming to an end. Meat should be high quality, free of chemicals and expensive. But humans do need meat as part of a balanced diet and no other non-meat source provides the punch of meat, high in protein and minerals. Ask any high-performance athlete. It is also possible for humans to live on diets with fewer vegetables and fruits, but high in meat or seafood: just look at the Inuit people or Mongolians. Vegetarians never like to confront that evidence. The issue of global over-population comes up as well: there is now way in hell we will be able to maintain the current population growth and feed these people well with just vegetables and grains.

3
TinTinMan

Ban Meat - YES!!!!

2
TrudiPants

Great work EU and British governments and the leaders in the US

2
sara star

Well for starters at least treat the animals humanely. How can they keep their immune systems healthy if we treat them poorly? And then we consume that???

According to Doreen Virtue in regards to Life Force...

Each food and beverage has a "frequency" according to how much "life force" is in it. Life force comes from the sunshine and air that the plant is grown in. Foods' life force also varies according to how it is processed before eating. Higher life-force foods compliment and uplift a person's spiritual growth. These foods help us to feel lighter, more energetic, and more aware of our Divine guidance.

...Meat, fowl, and other animal products (including dairy) also have no life force, as they are dead or inert. If the animal was cruelly treated during its life or its slaughter, the energy of the animal's pain is carried in its flesh and dairy products.


2
LilHoody

What beautiful and benevolant messages of love and hope.

There is a beautiful passage in an 'Autobiography of a Yogi' where they talk about the feelings of everything, even plants. Back then (so, it was early 1900's), a scientist did a test where he would put a foreign object next to a plants leaf. They were able to see each individual cell of that leaf behalf very erratically, some would even die.

They would then touch the leaf, promoting love and happiness. The leaf's cell were almost dancing with joy.

We must be aware that we are all part of the universe. And any action that we take has an equal reaction. The act of making the choice not to kill an animal is - well, our Earthly languages can not describe it. That choice is filled with so much love, beauty, happiness, joy and magnificence it radiates for the whole universe to listen.

2
Jordan Yerman

The headline is misleading here- governments are not banning meat. (though some have banned imports, which happens from time to time)

2
albertacowpoke

Jordan is right.  Even the EU hasn't banned meat.  It merely passed a law prohibiting the sale of seal products.   I did a story on this. Unfortunately I.m having trouble linking it here.  This effectively bans the sale of seal products, not a wholesale ban of all meats.  We should not confuse factory farms with well managed family operations.

Animal Husbandry is the issue here.  I respect the right for people to be vegetarians if they so choose, but that is not realistic for all of us.

2
Barbara McPherson

This is a good post for generating debate, however you must consider the unintended consequences of banning meat production.  The EU has banned seal meat, but Norway still hunts whales.  The North Sea is nearly seived clean of fish. The EU is talking about banning battery chickens but not insisting pigs be treated in a humane manner.  No meat production, no leather, no manure for gardens.  I am against all these meat factories which endanger everybody's health.  I am for farms on which meat animals have a place.  It is for everyone to remember that vegetarianism is not necessarily a green solution.  A field of corn displaces wildlife.  A rice paddy is an artificial construct denying  wild plants and animals habitat.  We can't say that we are more humane because we choose to kill off the natural world in an indirect manner.  Every human being must shoulder some responsibilty for that.

2
M-J

It is true Barbara that a vegetarian diet also has an impact on the Earth.  However, please keep in mind that meat-based diets require 10-20 times as much land as a plant-based diet and nearly half of the world's grains, corn and soybeans are fed to animals.  Grain currently fed to livestock is enough to feed 2 billion people.  1/3 of the world's cereal harvest and over 90% of soya is used to feed animals.  If everyone adopted a vegetarian diet and no food was wasted, current food production would theotretically feed 10 billion people, more than the projected population for teh year 2050.

And to those who continue to believe that we cannot get all of the nutrients that we need (protein and iron for example) from vegetable sources, I urge you to do your research.  In my decision to go vegetarian, I also had my doubts.  However, the research that I did demonstrated that we can get everything that we need from a plant-based diet, and I have never felt healthier and more full of energy.

As for high-performance athletes and labourers, they too can get enough of what they need.  To give you an example: Carl Lewis (US 9-time Olympic Gold medalist), Murray Rose (Australian swimmer, 4-time olympic gold medalist), Prince Fielder (US baseball player), Greg Chapell (ex-Australian cricketer), Peter Brock (former Australian race-car driver) are all vegetarian.  

The Australian recommended dietry intake for iron for a man 19 years and over is 8mg.  1 cup of soybeans provides about 8.8mg of iron and 1 cup of spinach, lentils or quinoa will provide a bit over 6mg.  Many fruits, vegetables, nuts, breads, pasta all have some iron in it so it is very easy to ensure that you are getting your daily requirement. 

Contrary to popular belief, we do not need large amounts of protein.  Getting the recommended intake is enough and there does not appear to be any health benefits of having more protein in your system.  Nearly all vegetables, beans, grains, nuts, and seeds contain some, and often much, protein. Fruits, sugars, fats, and alcohol do not provide much protein, so of course a diet based only on these foods would have a good chance of being too low in protein.  

Its just a matter of eating a healthy diet.  But I think the majority of the western world would benefit from tweaking thier diet, at least a little bit.  

It seems I have written my own little story here, rather than a simple comment, but as you said Lilhoody, this particular issue does get quite heated!  I am certainly sick of feeling the need to defend the vegetarian diet to people (such as many of my family and friends) who have not done an ounce of research on the subject. 



1
Paschen

Do not forget though that the EU imports meat form South America, North America and Australia because it does no longer produce as much and because its own meat production is becoming to expensive due to all the well fair restriction. However the demand is still high and why now the imports wish causes another problem. Transport, Pollution and large scale farming in the Americas. 

The goal is good, yet the way to get there is not easy. 

The UN has been calling for an end to Fish and Meat consumption for over a decade now. It is the only way to restore our environment and especially our oceans.

The problem still is Protein supply for some, since not all people work in air conditioned offices. But rather hard physical work and long hours, those can not live on a vegetarian diet alone. 

Never the less our meat consumption has to be drastically reduced since we do consume far more then we would require to live.

We could reduce our meat consumption by 95% in the western countries with out any problem nor damage to health or well being, it would even be healthier for most, other then the Physical hard labourer.

1
sara star

Protein yes, and also iron, which many of us low on, especially women.

1
sara star

I notice in NS, last week our major grocery chain Superstore, now offers "Free From" meats, which is free from hormones, and antibiotics and animals are grain fed. People complain that it is too expensive. I don't think so. Being sick is more expensive. See my story here.  Hope I didn't go off topic too much.

1
Jarrett Martineau

Interesting post. Thanks for this.

1
Amy Judd

This is great actually - thanks for this piece.

0
LilHoody

Thank you all - its great to discuss topics that people feel so passionately about.

It almost seems that leading a vegetarian, plant based diet causes much debate around the world. It seems equivalent to discussing religion at the turn of the century, to discussing politics and war (though still today) in the middle of the century - to what seems like discussing vegetarianism today.

0
Tomitheos

I agree with Jordan that the title is misleading, with that aside the info and pics posted provide a fair informed awareness on the topic.

0
Art_By_Alida

No one has banned meat...this article is misleading.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Rhonda J Mangus
First Flagged at 11:27 PM, May 11, 2009 by Rhonda J Mangus
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (70)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from