NP Rank:
Greening The Internet: How Much CO2 Does This Article Produce?
You are leaving a carbon footprint while reading this piece of article. Yeah, that's true. With every passing second you are releasing more CO2 in the atmosphere.
The amount may be only a few milligrams but with the large number of people getting online around the world, one can imagine the larger picture.
Calculating the carbon footprint of the entire web however is not as easy as measuring the greenhouse gas emissions of a car but atleast one can figure out the enormity of the situation.
Read On!
Twenty milligrams; that's the average amount of carbon emissions generated from the time it took you to read the first two words of this article.
Wissner-Gross estimates every second someone spends browsing a simple web site generates roughly 20 milligrams of C02. Whether downloading a song, sending an email or streaming a video, almost every single activity that takes place in the virtual environment has an impact on the real one.
As millions more go online each year some researchers say the need to create a green Internet ecosystem is not only imperative but also urgent.
"It is part of the whole sustainability picture," Chris Large, head of research and development at UK-based Climate Action Group, told CNN.
This is just a small excerpt of the entire story. Here is the entire story on CNN
Crowd Power
-
SamirJ
Vadodara, Gujarat, India
Recommendations (65)
-
jazzyzazzy
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
huneds
London, United Kingdom -
glenajess
Croydon, London, United Kingdom -
Kevin Fed
Manchester, United Kingdom -
sara star
Halifax, NS, Canada
-
Babel-Fish
Negros Oriental, Philippines -
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Suranee
Ratnapura, Sri Lanka -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States









Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (16)
at 09:13 on July 11th, 2009
great views..thanks for share
at 09:30 on July 11th, 2009
Scary!
at 09:34 on July 11th, 2009
I hope I'm leaving a carbon footprint ... it proves I am living, and learning in this life.
Further, I am helping the botanical side of the equasion by providing the necessary part of the osmosis process upon which plants produce oxygen (which we all depend on to breathe).
at 11:05 on July 11th, 2009
Thanks for the thought provoking comment Sir! Much appreciated!
at 16:21 on July 11th, 2009
Not me. I'm holding my breathe for the whole article. Ha! Now I'd better stop writing and move onto the next blog before I pass out...........
at 09:50 on July 11th, 2009
How do statisticians ever figure out the numbers? Do they include the amount of gas emissions used during research too? I don't think you can put a number on it except infinity. If you follow the trail, there is another one, then another; it is neverending......... everything is interconnected, just like the web ..internetted you can say. (I just made that word up).
at 10:17 on July 11th, 2009
That is an awesome comment from Sara!! Just brilliant!!
at 10:09 on July 11th, 2009
thank you for write
at 11:37 on July 11th, 2009
the REAL question is:
is CO2 a pollutant, or is global warming a hoax?
the answer is always about $$$
at 13:46 on July 11th, 2009
I have bunch of plants in my room so they spend all of CO2 i produce.
at 15:26 on July 11th, 2009
I believe that the CO2 is calculated based on the electricity needed to run your computer, the server and the relays that get the webpage to you.
CO2 levels have varied greatly over history.
at 16:15 on July 11th, 2009
I thought the this whole 'Green' business was about lowering cO2, not trying to eradicate it completely (which is impossible by the way).
I personally feel that one should not worry about how much CO2 we are release by reading blog posts. That's a little over the top.
at 18:16 on July 11th, 2009
Sorry I missed this earlier. Great post.
Every Google search uses the same energy then one 100 watt light bulb does in one hour.
at 18:48 on July 11th, 2009
Very interesting.
at 01:26 on July 13th, 2009
Let us not overlook the huge benefits the internet is for the environment.
1. The internet has enabled millions of workers around the world to telecommute - and leave their cars at home - much less carbon monoxide and other poisonous gases in the air we breathe.
2. The internet has allowed us to buy "virtual" copies of music through excellent services like Apple's itunes. In the past couple of weeks, millions of Michael Jackon songs have been downloaded from the internet instead of being stamped onto physical Audio CDs, which get scratched, thrown in the trash and then dumped into land fills.
3. The internet has allowed us to collaborate virtually, using Digital Video Conferencing, Skype, etc eliminating the need for excessive business travel. Less cars on the road again and less airplanes in the air.
4. The internet allows us to read newspapers and other news sources like "NowPublic.com" online instead of chopping down millions of trees to print hard copies, which are trashed, burnt or buried in land fill.
Yes, you may have created some Carbon dioxide by using your computer to read this article on the web, but as stated above, carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant, it is the lifeblood of the planet. Trees and plants require CO2 to breath and convert into oxygen that you and I breath.
So instead of beating up on the internet, lets pause and reflect on the great accomplishments of internet inventors like Tim Berners-Lee and DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the incredible freedom it has enabled us and the huge positive impact on the environment.
(Much applause here and cheers)
at 02:17 on July 13th, 2009
Yep and the Television, radio and all out forms of electronic entertainment does exactly the same thing if we are not connected to renewable energy sources. The computers are not the problem the internet is not the problem its the power source that's the problem. neilabraham has hit the nail right on the head