NP Rank:
How humans cooled the earth -- 500 years ago
The documentary film "Life after People" showed the speed at which man-made materials break down when they are not maintained. E.g. iron and concrete return to their original form. The docu. also shows how in Chernobyl today, just 20 years after the evacuation, animals and plants are thriving, while humans can't enter the area due to radioactivity levels. The point made in the following article is that human impact on the environment can be based on good practice, –now that we know better.
How humans cooled the earth -- 500 years ago
by Andrew Leonard, January 7, 2009–
One of the tell-tale signs of a really thought-provoking book is that soon after reading it, you start seeing its thesis replicated everywhere you look. So it has been with one of the tomes I referred to in yesterday's post "Polynesian Chickens in Peru and other Mysteries," Charles Mann's "1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus."
The massive depopulation of the Americas via smallpox, hepatitis and other diseases introduced by Westerners (perhaps as much as 95 percent of the existing population died in vast pandemics) and the large landscape-altering scale of agriculture practiced across the "New World" by pre-Columbian cultures are two of the big themes of "1491." Both popped up in a presentation made by two scientists at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union last December. (Thanks to MongaBay for the tip.)
The scientists contend that after the die-off, massive reforestation on abandoned agricultural land occurred on a large enough scale to contribute significantly to the period of global cooling between 1500 and 1750 known as the "Little Ice Age."
After examining soil samples and sediment cores from numerous locations in Central and South America, Richard Nevle, a visiting scholar at Stanford's Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences at Stanford, and Dennis Bird, also from Stanford, concluded that the reforestation sequestered as much as 10 to 50 percent of the carbon necessary to cool the earth. Up until 1500, the soil samples showed a steady increase in charcoal content, likely generated from human-caused fire used to clear forest. After 1500, the scientists discovered a drastic drop in charcoal content. No more burning.
The scientists acknowledge that reforestation was just one factor in contributing to global cooling. It may not even have been the most critical factor. But the research is sobering nonetheless, in its hint as to humanity's power to alter the fundamental characteristics of life on this planet, long before we were burning fossil fuels as if there were no tomorrow. We did it back then, we're doing it now, and maybe, just maybe, if we exert our collective will in the proper direction, we can fix our mistakes.
Let's just hope it doesn't require another vast die-off to set things to rights.
Crowd Power
-
Milieunet
Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Recommendations (44)
-
Barbara McPherson
Nanaimo, Canada -
Tina Kells
Vancouver, Canada
-
mudricky
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
LotusFlower
Nottingham, United Kingdom -
Ravi Dixit
Mumbai, India -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 17:55 on January 8th, 2009
I'll echo Leonard's hope that it won't take a massive die off to cool things down.
at 19:30 on January 8th, 2009
That is a great Article, And it does make sense if you know the climatological history of this our planet.
I am almost angry I did not think of it my self before reading this. This would in deed explain a lot of the 1500-1750 little ice age. And it seems rather logical. Meaning though we have to cut back by over 6 billion people or really adopt better global management practices.
Well, Knowing our Humanity and its selfishness, I suppose the latter wont happen.
at 20:53 on January 8th, 2009
That documentary 'Life after people' really freaked me out actually. I hated how things changed so much in such a short amount of time - I suppose because we were not there to destroy it. Interesting piece though.
at 01:11 on January 9th, 2009
What bemused me about the docu. was that the experts were all smiling while telling us about how everything man-made only lasts as long as it is maintained. I remember as a child being fascinated by the fact that all bridges need to be painted continuously. I liked learning about the way we re-form minerals, but it is temporary, because those minerals will eventually return to their mineral state.
Actually, my fav. part was when the woman showed us the huge sports stadium at Chernobyl, and the camera turned to the sports field, to show us the tall trees, all self-seeded within just 20 years.
at 23:21 on January 8th, 2009
good article, but the doco was terrible!!
at 14:02 on January 9th, 2009
Well, it wasn't a classy looking documentary, but it certainly was informative! The makers were obviously working with a very low budget. :) I liked the interviewees, and their attitude.