If Passed, Cap-and-Trade Bill Will Cost You Dearly

by BMCWrites | May 28, 2009 at 11:57 am
600 views | 2 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

If Passed, Cap-and-Trade Bill Will Cost You Dearly

If Passed, Cap-and-Trade Bill Will Cost You Dearly

see larger image

uploaded by BMCWrites

The Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill will hit consumers of petroleum fuels especially hard by dramatically increasing the costs of goods and services as noted in the graphic at right, according to two groups closely following the legislation.

In a three-page document (pdf) forwarded to me early this afternoon, American Petroleum Institute officials warn that people who use automobiles, trucks, planes, trains, heating oil and other non-transportation petroleum products will shoulder the lion’s share of the burden.  In addition, the inequitable nature of the legislation could worsen the pain for everyone.

If, rather than read the API document above, you’d prefer seeing a “Top 10″ list of problems associated with Waxman-Markey, take a look at the Top 10 List of Problems associated with cap-and-trade legislation below, courtesy of the the Heritage Foundation:

1. Cap-and-trade is a massive energy tax;

2. It will not make a substantive impact on the environment;

3. It will kill jobs;

4. It will cause electricity bills and gas prices to sharply increase;

5. It will outsource manufacturing jobs and hurt free trade;

6. It will make you choose between energy, groceries, clothing and haircuts;

7. It will be highly susceptible to fraud and corruption;

8. It will hurt senior citizens, the poor, and the unemployed the worst;9. It will cost American families over $3,000 a year; and

10. President Obama admitted “Electricity Rates Would Necessarily Skyrocket” under a cap-and-trade program (January 2008).  [Note:  See my post for more details.]

I urge you to read, understand and take action upon this information — and DO IT NOW!

In addition to sharing this information with everyone you know, I urge you to CONTACT YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS in Washington, D.C., and demand they oppose this dangerous and costly legislation.

-- Bob McCarty Writes

recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Roy C

The way to reduce energy use is to subsidize energy saving investments with tax breaks. We started to do in in the '80s and Reagan and the Congress killed it.

You don't need "cap and trade". It is good for pollutants, but the problem of carbon dioxide is not the same category and requires a massive reduction in energy use, not the kind of transfer that is involved in cap-and-trade.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Roy C
First Flagged at 1:44 PM, May 28, 2009 by Roy C
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from