NP Rank:
Livestock Farming One of the Main Menaces for the Environment.
By, Uwe Paschen.
Livestock Farming one of the main menaces of the environment today.
Farming and Livestock farming should be Ecological and not a major polluter one would think, after all, we are dealing with Animals in a natural environment and is that not the way Nature works? The problem is not nature here, nor the animals or the Farmland per says. The problem does lie in the way farming or Agriculture has evolved over the past century.
In the last 20 years, alone one third of all Livestock farm holdings have disappeared, yet the amount of Livestock has increased by 40% over the same period in the EU alone. In North America, the trend is even more dramatic.
http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/envir/report/en/live_en/report.htm
Further, the Land mass used to hold those animals has decreased by 50% since 1995. This means that there are 40% more Animals on 50% less land today then there was in 1995.
http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/envir/index_en.htm
Why is this trend of Increased Livestock number on less land as well as the increase in Meat consumption causing a problem for the environment at large. More Animal do produce more Methane Gas for starter and this Methane Gas has an even greater negative impact on Global Warming or also called Green House Gases then CO2 does.
Further, a higher concentration of animals in a confined place and on a smaller area does cause higher health problems for the Animals and a much faster cross contamination of diseases. The Stress the Animals are under in such confined dwelling causes for their immune system to be weaker and there for to be more susceptible to diseases.
This is being countered with cheep mass medications such as a wide spectrum of antibiotics and even anti inflammatory drugs as well as hormones in order to keep the animals alive and growing fast for slotter or producing more milk in the case of the dairy industry. To a point that the nutritional value of this meat and the Dairy products is negligible today.
However, the negative impact of Antibiotic, Hormonal residues is not only affecting Humans in particular that consume those meat and dairy products, even more the environment at large is affected. Residues are fund in the Ground water, lakes, and rivers and even in the sea today as well as in topsoil's, where plants and vegetables absorb some of those Residues wish we end up eating our self due to the contaminated manure being spread on the land.
http://books.google.com/books?id=MdfBc1EyEDEC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Agriculture+and+environment
Those Farming methods do provide most in the Industrialised World with rather cheep meat and dairy products, yet those are now of little nutritional value and contaminated with residues that affect the over all health of Humans and wild life alike in a rather negative manner. Ending up costing us more in health care and treatment then if we where to produce food environmentally responsible and humanly as well.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2557617.stm
The excuse for this sort of agriculture has always been that we need to feed the World. This however is nothing more then a fairy tail, all hunger around the globe is directly linked to Politics, Wars, Land rights and ownership, Diversion of land use, to non-productive use, Increasing emphasis on export-oriented agriculture, Inefficient agricultural practices, Famine, Drought, Over-fishing, Poor crop yield due to pollution, climate changes and over use of Chemicals, Lack of democracy and rights, and unfair trade or Climate changes as well as pollution caused by Human. Further the over production of the Industrial countries ends up going into the garbage bin or being spread on the land since we want money for our production even in Agriculture and those that are starving can not pay, so the food certainly does not go to them.
http://www.globalissues.org/article/7/causes-of-hunger-are-related-to-poverty
Why have we not changed to system yet? One of the main reasons is protectionism and trade war especially between the USA, Canada, Mexico, the European Union, Russia and now Brazil and Argentina as well. Protectionism and politics of market dominance rather then sound management of the resources. Also called Global Natural Resource Management and environmental impact analysis.
http://www.unapcict.org/ecohub/communities/natural-resources-management
The UN or other organizations cannot be held responsible here, nor can we blame the Farmers at large, the main problem lies with the consumer and voters. Those are in large part causing this trend to persist and the consumer is at the heard why this came into existence by the way we shop and decide what and where to buy. The consumer at large is the only one today that can force a change as well and that will only happen once we the consumer realized in large enough numbers that we need to change our habits and priorities.
There for it may take a wile yet, before we may see any improvement.
Crowd Power
-
ESOX LUCIUS
Hellevoetsluis, Netherlands -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
ngr07
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Recommendations (32)
-
gerrypopplestone
London and elsewhere, United Kingdom -
francisrivera
Manila, Philippines -
amyjudd
Vancouver, Canada
-
Rachel Nixon
Vancouver, Canada -
windiepink
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada -
ESOX LUCIUS
Hellevoetsluis, Netherlands -
danesller0127
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia -
SOLARLIFE
FRENCH RIVIERA MONACO LONDON, France










Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (20)
at 22:24 on December 13th, 2008
you're right - you wouldn't think of lifestock having this kind of effect, but it's shocking that they do, because there is really no alternative. Even if we all went vegitarian, the animals would still exist.
at 02:22 on December 14th, 2008
If we where to extend that reflection we may finally see that we are animals our self's. You are making a very interesting point here. Thank you. I do appreciate the input very much.
at 02:33 on December 14th, 2008
Your point well said. Thanks for an interesting article.
at 03:58 on December 14th, 2008
Francis good to see you around again, hope to read your next post soon. Thank you for the visit, comment and R here, I do appreciate it.
at 03:40 on December 14th, 2008
As soon as I saw the title to this piece, I guessed what it was about. So I looked in the big box under my bed for the thick file marked Methane Gas and I read through all the (200 articles) stuff, especially the articles with headings such as : Why Methane Is Essential For Your Health and The Future Of The Planet, and things like Why You Should Eat More Beef.
So now I'm ready to take you on! Swords or Water-Pistols? You can decide!
You are absolutely right to complain about cattle and subsidies and methane. Its true the land in use for herds of cattle is decreasing, but the numbers are rising dramatically (and in some areas of fragile savannah, they are destrying the soil irrevocably). But the new feeds they are being given is being grown on other land (probably land that used to be Amazon rain forest). Its completely outrageous and governments should not keep subsidising cattle rearing, but there is little thyat can be done. The meat industry is wealthy: the adverts keep coming (Have you read Raj someone - forget his name: Stuffed or Starved? about the organisation of the world food industry: EXCELLENT book).
Each tiome I think about it makes my blood boil: and methane is far more destructive than CO2 although people dont realise it.
Ive just written two p[ieces on dam building, including some stuff on methane concentrations in dams and the extent of the damage which is quite sertious. But I cant publish them because of the fiasco over the new NP programme today. They are locked in draft form although somehow 70 people already read them! Don't know how to rectify it but Amy has asked the technicians to look at it tomorrow.
So, Paschen. What will it be:
Swords, Ploughshares or Water Pistols?
PS: THere is something wrong with my spelling of 'irrevocably'!
at 03:56 on December 14th, 2008
I like the water pistol in summer, now it is a little to cold so lets put this off until summer. :)
You are correct with your comment and yes it should make any one's blood boil as far as I am concerned. The subsidy war is ridiculous and needs to stop especially in the area of livestock CAFO operations.
I am glad you bring up the feed here, most of this feed is rather outrageous as well, in some areas Hormones and dead animals are being feed back to Herbivores and we are surprised to have mad cow disease. High protein diets to increase Milk production and accelerate grows mainly Soya bean meal and Corn and this Corn is depleting the top soils radically like no other plan could ever do.
Further this form of Livestock handling increases monocultures that do not have a positive effect on the ecosystem.
I am sorry about your post, have you tried to repost it with a minimum of tags and no location, it did end up working for me, the tags and location seem to be one of the problems. Add the Picture only latter in edit may help as well.
Thank you for the read, comment and R here, I do appreciate it.
at 05:19 on December 14th, 2008
I ought to have added that Methane is far more serious than CO2!
Thanks for the advice about tags/location. I will try that! I never thought of doing the opposite of what the site was telling me to do. Ive been round in circles with it all afternoon!
at 04:05 on December 14th, 2008
You say it Methane from Cow-Hamburgers destroys Ozone layer more than CO2. Unfortunately Rice fields ( a non-animal food ) are also emitting enormous amounts of Methane
at 05:09 on December 14th, 2008
Yes SOLARLIFE why I said "one of the main menaces for the environment", Cow, and Swine as well as Chicken and Rice are major methane producer and yet one has to differentiate Rice as in White Rice grown in large fields with water and Wild rice or brown rice that are grown on dry land with much less water. The Wild Rice and Braun Rice does not produce this sort of Methane gas there for we should eat brown or wild rice rather then White rice.
Than you for the comment good point in deed.
at 03:48 on December 14th, 2008
The book is Raj Patel: Stuffed and Starved - Markets, Power and the battle for the future of the Food Industry.
exceedingly well written; full of lots of good detail. he is very knowledgeable and writes in a good story telling style!
at 03:59 on December 14th, 2008
Thank you for the info of the book Gerry, I shall and will look it up next time I am in Tokyo. Much appreciated.
at 04:01 on December 14th, 2008
Let's talk proteins, what about Californian tests on carp fish farming in transparent containers, algaes harvesting sunlight, fish eating algae. Water from fish tank to vegetable fields as fertilizer. Any ideas if this would work ? Great article, good basic life science Paschen.
at 04:20 on December 14th, 2008
http://www.aquavisiononline.com/
The link above gives some info on Organic Fish and Crab Farming the link below as well as the Abstract give some information about the negative impact of Fish Farming due to the simple fact that those fish are being feed Fish that in harvested in the see and the study does touch pollution as well as problems with disease control due to over crowding of the Fish population on those farms and those disease being spread onto the wild Fish population in the ocean, since high amount of anti biotic are being feed to the fish in farms to stay alive some of those diseases have become resisted and the wild Fish population has no means any longer to defend them self against it. Some what counter productive.
http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/00/fishfarms628.html
Abstract.:
"FARMED SALMON:
This Atlantic salmon was raised on a fish farm along the coast of New Brunswick, Canada. The average farmed salmon is more than 20% bigger than a decade ago, thanks to the increased use of feed made from herring and other small fish. But harvesting wild fish to feed farmed fish threatens ocean fisheries around the world. (courtesy Rebecca J. Goldburg)
But while ocean fisheries are in decline, commercial fish farming or aquaculture is booming. Farmers now produce more than one-fourth of all the finfish and shellfish directly consumed by people worldwide.
This rapid rise in aquaculture production "is a mixed blessing, however, for the sustainability of ocean fisheries," according to a new study by economist Rosamond L. Naylor and biologist Harold A. Mooney.
Writing in the June 29 issue of the journal Nature, Naylor and Mooney point out that, "on balance, global aquaculture still adds to world fish supplies."
But, they warn, the growing demand for farm-raised salmon, shrimp and other commercially valuable species actually threatens the world's supply of fish.
The "underlying paradox," write the authors, is that "aquaculture is a possible solution but also a contributing factor to the collapse of fisheries stocks around the world.""
The Crab or river Crab can easily be raised and harvest with out major set ups nor special diets, however using fish tank water for field is only good if the water is soft water and if the fish where raised Bio Dynamic, meaning with out antibiotic nor hormones since those would end up on the land and get into the wild life population as well as being absorbed by the plants and feed back to Animals and Human alike. Would cause major problem in the long run such as we do already have like resistant bacteria to antibiotics.
Thank you for the read, comment and R here SOLARLIFE, I do appreciate it.
at 04:31 on December 14th, 2008
Does a small family Fish Farm, 1 or 2 vertical transparent Containers with the sun light grown Algae food Only ( no pellets) the job ? Carps can live from that, if you have only 10 in One tank they don't get thick. Is the small Family Farm a way out Paschen ?
at 04:38 on December 14th, 2008
Such farm would be beneficial for the nutrient value and the garden water being off high nutrient value. The trick may be to have the right algae growing and not some of the more toxic once that can some times show up due to to much sun light and possible air born contamination. We eat algae here as well as crabs and it works rather well, however we grow them in a pond. Glass container would work as well, they are harder to balance though then an ingrown pond would be.
at 12:31 on December 14th, 2008
Great indepth story Uwe!
at 16:21 on December 14th, 2008
The UN established this fact of CO2 from cows causing "most" of the global warming quite a while ago.
I say global warming is caused by toothpaste, Vitamine E, and oatbran and the mediteranian diet.
environMENTALISM causes global warming.
Everything causes glowBULL whining.
Y2K, BigFoot, Eugenics, WMD's, The CO2 Theory.....................................
at 20:12 on December 14th, 2008
And what research did you conduct leaving you to those conclusions? With what institute or University did you work to make those findings?
at 21:06 on December 14th, 2008
Many thanks to all, for reading, Commenting, R's and for adding some great Farm Animal Photos here. Much appreciated.
at 07:41 on March 21st, 2009
MR.UWE,thanx very much for this kind of information.am a student at mekerere university kampala uganda and visited yo article while making research on the impact of livestock farming on the environment.am working on my desertation for apartial fulfilment of abachelor's degree.i thank you for providing me with information that will guide me while handling my literature review.i really need more information Mr.Uwe.thank you again.am pursuing a bachelor's degree in environmental management,final year.