Low cost solar energy: thanks to organic solar cells

by Chaitanya S | April 12, 2009 at 10:15 am
954 views | 14 Recommendations | 4 comments

Cost has been the main factor inhibiting large scale use of solar energy, an abundant and clean form of energy.  A large portion of this cost goes for solar panels that contain photovoltaic cells necessary for converting the sun’s energy into a usable form (electricity.)

Though costs are decreasing, the decrease is quite gradual, and the existing cost still keeps solar energy out of reach of common people. However, new technologies promise to drastically bring costs down. Among these is making solar panels from organic solar cells.

The solar panels of today contain photovoltaic cells made out of refined silicon. Silicon is the second most abundant element in the earth’s crust and is present in most rocks that we see. You would expect that, coming from such an abundant source, solar panels would be rather cheap.

However, silicon does not exist by itself. It almost always exists in combination with oxygen as silica. Silica is a tough mineral, with a melting point of over 1600 degrees Celsius. Solar cell manufacturing requires, at the least, melting of silica. This requires a high amount of energy.

 Organic solar cells, on the other hand, are made out of light absorbing polymers and do not contain silicon. Because of that, they are cheaper to make. They don’t consume as much energy for manufacturing as silicon based solar cells do. Because they don’t consume so much energy, manufacturing of organic solar cells is also relatively more environment-friendly.

Organic solar cells, however, have some demerits: they are not as efficient as silicon based solar cells in converting solar energy into electricity, and they are susceptible to environmental degradation.

Silicon based cells have an efficiency of 15% but organic solar cells have an efficiency of less than 5%. However, being a major area of focus in solar energy research is a big advantage.  Much of the effort is devoted to improving conversion efficiency.

Recently, conversion efficiencies of 5% have been achieved in research efforts. With the use of nanotechnology, the efficiency is expected to improve further, to a level where it can compete with that of silicon based cells.

Organic solar cells are susceptible to environmental degradation over time. But it is only a matter of time before reliable protective coverings are developed.

No doubt this is still a developing technology. But once the problems of efficiency and degradation are solved, the stage will be set for large scale, low cost, and environment-friendly manufacturing of organic solar cells.

The future of solar energy is bright. A reason for energy hungry developing countries like India, desperate for energy to drive the economic growth so necessary for fighting poverty, to rejoice.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
Uwe Paschen

There is an interesting article in relation to your post 

http://www.physorg.com/news148149704.html

Worth the read as well. Good post. You may want to add Tech/Bizz as a tag here as well.

0
kuuva

definitely this subject needs to be high priority. Really the next 20-40 years may be the most important period in humankind. I expect we most likely will see the biggest change in how energy is generated.
 There clearly are solutions, the problem is we make it 100% economic. Sometimes to move forward there is a premium that has to be paid. Why not make this a huge national priority like the Manhattan Project?

thanks paschen for recommending a good artricle from phyorg.com, these guys always have good reading.

0
Chaitanya S

Paschen,

Thanks for the feedback.

Mark Jacobson is largely right about wind, solar, coal and biofuels. Anything that burns is not good. The carbon emitted when biofuels are burnt may go back to plants via photosynthesis but the pollution that results from burning remains.

But I disagree with him on nuclear energy. We do emit a lot of carbon while building n-power plants but these plants are built for a long future of continuous clean energy. I think the more important problem when it comes to nuclear energy is waste disposal.

Nuclear energy has an important advantage over wind and solar - its high energy density. In a n-power plant, you can make a lot of electricity in a relatively smaller area. To generate the same amount of power using either wind or solar, you will need huge areas. This may be a problem for developing countries with severe population pressures, where acquiring land for huge solar and wind farms can be a costly affair.

0
Chaitanya S

kuvva,

You are right. The problem really is of economics. With the vast resources at their disposal, governments can play a role in making things easier.

Here in India, we have elections coming up. Political parties are competing with each other in their promises of providing free electricity, free rice, free wheat, free TVs, free cash etc. I really dislike populist public policy but one area where I would support massive government spending is on free solar home lighting. I have written about it elsewhere. I'm posting it on NowPublic soon. Watch out...

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

deleted_user_72636
First Flagged at 3:04 PM, Apr 12, 2009 by deleted_user_72636

Related Stories

Recommendations (14)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from