Maquarie's Offices In Lock Down

by WestCoast TreeHugger | January 22, 2009 at 04:09 pm
257 views | 34 Recommendations | 5 comments

Videos

No Gateway Bailout

see larger video

sourced by WestCoast TreeHugger

No Gateway Bailout

Photos

Maquarie Bank Protest (photo by Eric Doherty)-Photo-01

Maquarie Bank Protest (photo by Eric Doherty)-Photo-01

see larger image

uploaded by WestCoast TreeHugger

Maquarie Bank's offices in downtown Vancouver were in lock down mode Thursday as about 60 activists rallied outside against the bank's involvement in the controversial Gateway project.

Speakers at the rally highlighted what they called the "twin meltdown" of climate change and the global financial crisas.  Maquarie bank has been selected as as part of the perferred bidder team but has yet to sign a contract.  Recently it has been revealed that Maquarie is having difficulty securing financing for the project. 

“The Premier has more than enough reasons to rethink the Gateway Project, the international banks balking at financing the twinning of the Port Mann Bridge is only the latest,” said David Fields of the Livable Region Coalition. “ The twin meltdowns of the economy and the climate signals that we need to do it differently, that we must have economic policy and investments that support the environment. Gateway is a waste of money that has been proven to worsen carbon and other air pollution, we need transit first.”

According to the BC Treasury Board, for every million dollars spent, transit projects create more jobs than road projects by 7 to 1. A report released yesterday by Sustainable Prosperity ranked investments in public transit as the top green economic stimulus option for Canada, whereas freeway and bridge expansions were ranked as third from last.

“Back in September, 2004, BC’s Transportation Minister Kevin Falcon first announced a price tag for the twinning the Port Mann Bridge of $800 Million. The most recent numbers, as quoted in Project Finance Magazine, was $2.3 Billion, almost triple the original estimate,” said Ben West, Healthy Communities Campaigner with the Wilderness Committee.

Now, Macquarie Bank, one of the Gateway project’s financiers, has failed to meet a January 8th deadline for signing off on the project’s financing. It has been reported that Macquarie is struggling to raise the $2.3 Billion it would need due to the global financial crisis and doubts about its business practices. The federal government will table a budget on January 27th that may pass the bill for the full cost of the Gateway project onto taxpayers.

“Investing in transit first is not only the greenest and economically appropriate option  for Metro Vancouver, it is also very popular with the public,” stated Fields. “A recent public opinion poll shows that residents prefer transit to freeway expansion by 2 to 1.”

A May public opinion poll conducted by Synovate on behalf of the David Suzuki Foundation and The Livable Region Coalition found that 69% of Metro Vancouver residents support redirecting money from freeway expansion to public transit in order to fight climate change. The same survey found that 60% of residents, or 2 to 1, support projects like the Evergreen Line and SkyTrain expansion to Surrey over the twinning of the Port Mann Bridge and expanding Highway 1.

amyjudd
amyjudd
flagged this story as Eyewitness Report

at 13:03 on January 23rd, 2009

This is an eyewitness report from the NowPublic member WestCoast TreeHugger who was on the scene.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
mtammas

This and the financing disaster of Vancouver's Olympic Village project should put an end to the public-private partnership schemes so loved by the current B.C. government. BC Transport Minister Kevin Falcon has said that there is a 'plan B' if the Macquarie funding didn't pan out. I can't imagine what the alternative could be. Perhaps using risky hedge funds? Or how about this, make it a traditional public project? Now there's an idea whose time never went away.

1
eastvanray

Do you pay taxes?  PP partnerships allow for projects to be completed with less increases in taxation.  To me that sounds like a win-win way to do things.  Why on earth would you prefer that we, the taxpayers, foot the entire bill?

0
WestCoast TreeHugger

"...completed with less increases in taxation. ..."

There is little evidence to support this statement.  In fact in case studies of the three P3s in BC: the Abbotsford Hospital, the Canada Line (known as “RAV”) and the District of Maple Ridge Core Project it was found that the P3 approach actually cost more

In other cases, governments have had to buy out disastrous P3s, as in the case of the Isle of Mann Bridge that cost about £25m to build but ended up costing the public £93m.

0
Amy Judd

good for them for speaking out.

Thanks for this.


0
158

Interesting and a good report.

Thanks.

I know of Vancouver BC but did not know there was one in Canada.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

mtippett
First Flagged at 8:02 PM, Jan 22, 2009 by mtippett
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (34)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from