Nut Job Goes Nuts Over ClimateGate

by JustMyOpinion | November 26, 2009 at 07:39 pm
153 views | 2 Recommendations | 0 comments

Every one knows Ed Begley, the actor and also the one who rides a stationary bike to make toast. Well he was on Fox news acting like a complete idiot attempting to defend the hoax of the century global warming which I have stated for years is not man made along with 100,' of other scientist who have been catapulted from "peer reviewed" journals in which these scientist dissented against the notion of "global warming".

Here are some of the e-mail extractions that were hacked over the weekend which suggest the global warming alarmist "scientist" manipulated or suppressed evidence to support their global warming hoax.

   

    Manipulation of evidence:

I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.

   

   

   

Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:

The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.

   

   

   

Suppression of evidence:

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?

Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.

Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.

We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.

   

   

   

Fantasies of violence against prominent Climate Sceptic scientists:

Next
time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat
the crap out of him. Very tempted.

   

   

   

Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):

……Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back….

 

   

    And here are the email extractions showing these global warming pushing scientist talked about how best to silence dissenting scientist out of the peer review process.  In other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority. 

   

  “This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?”

“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice !”

   

    As for the clown Ed Begely, with his continued rant and saying "peer reviewed" around 8 times in 10 seconds only discredited his argument with each mention.

   

  Begley flip flops during the interview while thrusting his finger in all directions as if having some sort of fit while stating “You should have an energy audit in your home to make it more efficient,” yet when asked by the host “What kind of American believes that the government should come right into a private house and say you can’t have this kind of light bulb,” begley in his confused, unconscious state of mind replied,  “Nobody’s going to come into your house.”

   

   Here is the video clip of Begley, he comes on after the Senator

Advertisement

Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Hugh Askew
First Flagged at 6:32 AM, Nov 27, 2009 by Hugh Askew

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from