NP Rank:
Organic Certified, Misleading labelling.
By, Uwe Paschen.
Many of us do buy Organic Food, and many more Would like to, yet can not afford it. Sadly most of us do not actually know what Organic food is nor how it is regulated or where it does all come from and why should we have to either, should we not be able to trust the label? Sadly no. Now even though I support Organic Farming and practice it my self on our Farm, the reality of it all looks rather bad, since most off it is not much different then other foods that are not Organic certified. Why? Well, Organic Food products come from all over the Globe and are being shipped by Plane, Ship, Truck and Vans around the world. Yet we know little more about the Foods Origin and production, packaging and sale methods other then the fact it is labelled Organic-Certified.
For some reason consumers through out the World and especially the Industrialized World still trust the Organic Label with out ever questioning it nor even asking the obvious questions, such Who does actually control all this and what are the regulation...? Should we not be able to trust those labels? Unfortunately no.
For one, a big surprise it may be for some readers and consumers the fact that Organic does not mean, Pesticide Free, nor does it mean Herbicide Free or GMO free, or being used... Surprised? Organic certification of any product varies greatly not only from Country to Country, but also from one Province, State, Department or Prefecture to another one. To the point that what is permitted in Texas US, may be outlawed in California US and what may be Okay in Ontario is not so in Quebec, same for what is allowed in the US over all may be out lawed in China and so forth.
For instance some States and Provinces allow the use of up to 15% GMO products in any Organic cereal or other food and still be certified Organic and sold as such to the consumer. Some areas ask Farmers for buffer zones for Organically grown crops so they may not get contaminated by pesticides or GMO's, however other Areas do not care about that and do even allow Farmers to do both, GMO and Organic Beans side by side on the same farm and sale the lot as Organic.
It does get more interesting though, In Japan for instance, In the prefecture of Nagano Kent, farmers are allowed to use Herbicides yet not Pesticides on their organic Crops, where as in Chiba Prefecture Farmers are not allowed to use either for their Organic Crops. Not a Japanese problem alone, it is world wide, Quebec demands Buffer Zones and zero GMO cross contamination, where as Ontario allows GMO cross contamination for up to 15% and no buffer zones are needed.
What does this mean? Well your Organic cereal is most likely no different or only little to none compared to the other none organic cereal, other then the price tag of course. If you add to this, transportation cost and pollution caused by the transportation then the Organic Rice or cereal you just both is actually in some cases worth then the generic or brand name product. This being said buying big brand food is usually the worth product.
However the best way to go seems to be local food. It seems that buying locally does not only make sense from and energy consumption point of view but it does seem to make Farmers and processors more responsible as well, since now their product is no longer shipped around the Globe to some stranger but rather to the next door nabber and who does want to harm or upset once nabber?
Some have been advocating this philosophy for some time now, such as Canada's David Suzuky, a well known environmentalist and Organic supporter, is now advocating to buy local rather then Organic for two main reasons as said earlier, one the productions certification is highly questionable and varies greatly from one place to another, even with in one Country and Two, buying Organic Potatoes from France in the USA or Organic Oranges from the USA in France does not make any sense at all and is environmentally counter productive for it causes great pollution to ship all this back and forth.
There for to buy Locally and better yet, skipping the middle man when ever you can and going directly to the Farmer seems to be the best and most responsible way to shop. At least then you know where your food really comes from and how it is produced.
Crowd Power
-
zarinmedia
Downtown Toronto (Christie), Ontario, Canada -
cbcastro
San Francisco, California, United States -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
jeanloui
Spain -
pablography
Olympia, Washington, United States
Recommendations (108)
-
lefty_liberated
New York, New York, United States -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Christina 123
LONDON, United Kingdom -
danesller0127
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia -
gerrypopplestone
London and elsewhere, United Kingdom
-
pinkberry143
Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines -
Milieunet
Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands -
Art_By_Alida
Ohio River Valley, Indiana, United States -
azzayindia
mussoorie,distt dehradun, Uttarakhand, India -
mofiac
Vancouver Island, Canada










Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (60)
at 16:36 on November 20th, 2008
organic is just a scam = lower production per hectare than by controlling weeds and pests using a few chemicals
at 16:38 on November 20th, 2008
I see you do really know a lot about it. And sound science and facts wont help most likely to debate this here. Thanks for the visit matte, much appreciate.
at 17:13 on November 20th, 2008
yes i work in ag science area and know that often organic production is in also all cases more environmentally unsustainable than using modern agricultural techniques.
Soil fertility decline is just one critical aspect. It is virtually impossible to get enough nutrient into the ground through mulching and spreading animal waste.
at 17:27 on November 20th, 2008
Great matte, then you may be interested in this Post as well.
http://my.nowpublic.com/environment/farming-out-drugs-and-pesticides-possible
I have been doing this for a very long time and if you like we can debate this respectfully and based on Science and studies.
Thank you for the comment.
at 19:37 on November 20th, 2008
I wish I had the time.
Organic might be possible for subsistence, but there are too many mouths to feed.....
at 21:54 on November 20th, 2008
With our modern methods we fail to feed all people not because we could not do so, more so because of politics and restrictions. I read a some where on the UN web page how much food we waist for every house hold and how much raw food is being destroyed directly on the farm or collection facilities, in some cases just to maintain the prises due to our over production. We could feed another World with those amounts.
at 18:17 on December 4th, 2008
In Canada, if the food grown does not look right in shape or color (carrot having second root, english cucumber not straight), then it is discarded. However, the nutrient content doesn't seem to matter......nor does the flavour.
at 16:41 on November 20th, 2008
Great post Paschen!
at 18:19 on November 20th, 2008
Thank you for the visit here and comment, Much appreciated.
at 16:47 on November 20th, 2008
Very interesting - I had no idea about half of this. I try to buy organic whenever I can, but sometimes it is too expensive for me. Maybe I need to ask for a pay raise... ;)
at 18:04 on November 20th, 2008
Thank you Amy, Very much appreciated and yes it is in a way a scam and miss leading consumers as well as stealing money from consumers since we know people try to do their best and it is being exploited shamelessly.
at 16:59 on November 20th, 2008
Very interesting, Paschen! Thanks!
at 18:08 on November 20th, 2008
Thank you Rhonda. Much appreciated.
at 17:09 on November 20th, 2008
Are you referencing the lack of a global 'Organic' standard? My understanding is that 'Organic' in the U.S. has very specific standards, regarding the growth of produce, raising cattle, as well as 'processed' foods.
Care to comment about the USDA standards for 'Organic' passed in 2002 (I think that's the righ year)?
at 17:44 on November 20th, 2008
There is a and are standards with in each and every country as well as state or Provinces, however their are variable and no uniformity, we do not have international standards nor do we have sound controls of the existing standards. If a product is certified in one place and then sold to another place where it is mixed with another product that was certified as well yet some where else and then sold to the consumer in yet another State, Country or province where yet other standards apply the consumer has no idea any longer nor can verify if this product he just bot is actually Organic or just certified Organic yet contains GMO and may be produced in a way he or she would not realize nor assume.
In some cases By laws have been passed or amendment to allowing up to 15% GMO to the existing regulations. This the consumer does not know nor realize and is there for miss lead and in a way it is fraudulent, there for criminal. Yet legal.
at 18:33 on November 20th, 2008
Indeed, there should be more uniform global standards and greater accountability in the accreditation process. Still, I find that the current situation (at least in the U.S.) isn't completely useless, and I would make the point that though it make have its flaws it still serves to deliver what it promises in the majority of the cases. But sure, unfortunately as greater and bigger corporate entities become involved in this process, it becomes more difficult to uphold the current standards, much less improve them. More than likely we will have to focus on fighting the battle on not allowing any further loosening of the current standards.
at 17:10 on November 20th, 2008
Thanks for the wake up call. It makes sense. Locally grown is something to consider. Like the 100 mile diet.
at 19:55 on November 21st, 2008
I think this was started in the UK in the 80th if i recall this correctly, It is actually a great Idea and well worth practising. It does pay off to since we get to know the people that do the work and produce the product. I do this when ever I can for all things even the Mechanic or parts and when ever possible. Thank you Sara for the Visit and comment.
at 17:32 on November 20th, 2008
Great post, Paschen. You're absolutely right, there is simply no global consensus on standards for organic products — and local food, if it's available, does appear to be the best option in terms of health and environmental benefits.
at 18:16 on November 20th, 2008
That is a good way to practice it, I think, When ever available affordable and doable. Thank you Jarrett for the visit and comment here.
at 17:37 on November 20th, 2008
my son and daughter-in-law are partial to organic and are looking for organic foods here in china too. i also supported the idea...that is until i read your post paschen. thanks.
at 18:20 on November 20th, 2008
Thank you for the visit and comment here Rumana I do appreciate it.
at 18:01 on November 20th, 2008
If you want it done right you gotta do it yourself !
at 18:10 on November 20th, 2008
Seem to be true in this case, sadly so though. Thank you for the read and comment here Emilio.
at 18:50 on November 20th, 2008
Thanks for alerting people. My faith in the organic label was shaken this year when I found garlic from China labelled organic. I can't believe that their organic is my organic -- pesticide, herbicide, fungicide, air pollution free produce and animals. We joke that we try the hundred foot diet. That's the distance from the house to our garden.
at 22:01 on November 20th, 2008
Thank you Barbara for the visit here and comment, Bio Dynamic, Organic, Environment friendly, and fair trade have all started with great intentions and good ideas and once they became popular some saw a way to make a lot of money on the back of the consumer.
The 100 foot diet is a great idea where ever possible. Here in large city's public gardens would be the anther or community gardens may help to supplement.
at 21:59 on December 6th, 2008
All garlic and herbs imported into Australia is Irridated.
at 19:41 on November 20th, 2008
interesting to see someine say in Winnipeg doing a 100 mile diet
No fish, apples tropical fruit or the hundreds of other foodstuffs that don't like high latitudes.
Grow in a greenhouse, but the greenhouse gasses associated with the manufacture and construction would offset efficient transport.
at 20:37 on November 24th, 2008
Not really matte, if we use geothermal and other renewable energies it would actually work better and cost effective as well.
With fossil fuel, I agree the hole thing would not make much sense and just ad more pollutant.
at 21:37 on November 20th, 2008
I like the Slow Food movement's approach - http://www.slowfoods.com
Best of all is BioDynamic (BD) farming, because it is such a specific method (sans the mythology).
After all, "orgainic" is only supposed to guarantee that toxic chemicals haven't been used in the growing and processing. ...but we can't always trust the sources.
Certified BD growers practice a 'careful' method of preparing and applying both soil and photosynthesis fertilizers, that guarantee the food will actually contain maximum nutrients - and taste delicious.
Re. cost, if we stop spending on processed foods, we could spend more on raw veggies and fruit and grains, and meats too, of course, that actually provide the nutrients we need to live long and healthy lives. Farmer's markets are a great way to find local produce. The Slow Food movement sponsors many - we have a great one nearby. ...socially colourful and the food is fresh!
We also have a glasshouse and a large garden. :) ...a great way to recover from too much time in front of the computers.