NP Rank:
Poznan Stall Over Indigenous Rights
United Nations Climate Change talks currently taking place in Poznan, Poland, have yielded few results. Even topics that had been anticipated to be resolved quickly aren't being agreed upon. One such topic is Aboriginal rights and title in the U.S., Australia, New Zealand and Canada.
Talks aimed at finding ways to protect tropical forests in a new global deal on global warming hit problems today after a row over the rights of indigenous people.
Green groups accused the US, Australia, New Zealand and Canada of deleting a line about indigenous peoples' rights from a draft agreement due to have been published tonight, as part of UN talks on climate change.
The original confidential draft, seen by the Guardian, talked of "noting the rights and importance of engaging indigenous peoples and other local communities".
The amended version mentions only "recognising the need to promote the full and effective participation of indigenous and local communities". The change sparked protests at the Poznan meeting by delegates representing indigenous groups from Panama and the US.
Campaigners said the suggested change would leave indigenous people across the world vulnerable to exploitation under proposals to pay tropical nations not to cut down forests.
A joint statement from groups including Friends of the Earth and the Rainforest Foundation condemned the change as "totally unacceptable". It said: "The forests being targetted... are those which indigenous peoples have sustained and protected for thousands of years. The rights of forest peoples to continue playing this role, and being rewarded for doing so, has to be recognised."
Talks continue, but the row threatens to derail attempts to agree a rulebook for forest-protection schemes, which was supposed to have paved the way to include them in a new global climate deal to succeed the Kyoto protocol. Deforestation causes almost a fifth of greenhouse gas emissions.
Negotiators had said such an agreement on forests was one of the few breakthroughs expected at the Poznan talks, which are largely a preparatory meeting for more serious negotiations next year.
In each respective country there is much debate and negotiation surrounding Indigenous rights to environmental areas and it is important that this be brought up in the international community, but it's just disheartening to see that nothing can be agreed upon in Poznan.
Crowd Power
-
Palvinder Singh
Surrey Upper West, British Columbia, Canada -
sireenaonthe6
Ohsweken, Ontario, Canada -
mintaka2
Mill Valley, California, United States -
a.foxkeesic
Canada -
Toban Black
London, Ontario, Canada -
Iñaki Vinaixa
New York, New York, United States -
Maree Tonkin
Australia -
chrisngayle2001
Westford, Massachusetts, United States -
Gymnopedie
Canada -
EnviroEmerg
Canada
Recommendations (31)
-
rahul
Caracas, Distrito Capital, Venezuela -
Jon Azpiri
Vancouver, Canada
-
panzerlawyer
Los Angeles, California, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Criticom
Chicago, Illinois, United States














Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 23:21 on December 9th, 2008
What a great story
at 19:03 on December 10th, 2008
But this conference is supposed to be about climate change! The Global North has a peculiar notion about the environment that is not shared by the Global South. There, its brown issues, not green issues - preventing changes to the environment that will save their homes, their lands and their livelihoods. Its not about writing down some notion of rights correctly. These are life and death issues to others. Poznan is stalling over rather more substantial issues.
at 13:30 on December 12th, 2008
I understand what you are saying and I didn't mean to imply that this was the sole contributor to the stalling, simply another facet of it. And though it's true that the Poznan talks are about climate change, rather than rights and title, I would argue that most Indigenous peoples are in general much more connected to the land than modern societies. The effects of climate change, and in turn the results of these talks, would affect them the most immediately and with the biggest impacts.
And important to consider too is the way in which Indigenous peoples engage with their environment. Indigenous peoples have extracted resources and have sustainability lived off the land for millennia and after a few short centuries "modern science" has ravaged the environment. In my opinion we should look to these Indigenous models of resource extraction and by involving them and securing their rights at the Poznan climate talks we are doing just that.
Thanks for your thoughts!
at 19:23 on December 12th, 2008
a parade of Tribal Journeys 2008 participants during the North American Indigenous Games, Duncan, British Columbia
Gymnopedie has contributed a photo to this story.