A Quota for maturity its a new energy economy

by jumpingone | March 24, 2009 at 06:36 pm
213 views | 2 Recommendations | 5 comments

The new energy 

 The best use of marketing logic for pollution reduction my first idea,s about carbon reduction programs was that there,s was an expectation that tree,s could do some or a lot of the carbon capture.  At this point in my article,  I would like to indulge  making my article less of a drag to read as the political sceptical and none  pun dents. Make this argument more interesting like this is Creationist science Darwin difference of understanding as an example. Self interest waged as science in the interest of pushing  sciences ocums razer in a direction were it could be of little help as an empirical assumption  faith and common ethical practice only partly having the best interests of the environment and survival of the economies.  Corporation involved in a selling frenzy of what amounts to moderate help  in a history that's cataclysmal and they may need a reminder to tern the show room light,s off at night before you buy.  

I have been asked to provide examples explanation  pertaining

GMs moth balling of a fuel saver car three decades ago.  After the seventy oil crises ended there was no commercial impetus to continue even knowing that there is going to be a repeat of more troubles with oil production and supply down the road

And the practice of burning tire dumps when they could have been of some use stopping shifting sands.

And like the example above there,s a required larger shift in approach with all subsequent mistakes made with out the in-inevitable time line that's is  getting ever closer and will add  indulgent,s to a problem.

Making the bridges longer polices approach is a complete wast of what we have now and that's some time to find the right way.  Forests are loved just like the bears that have more to lose now and saving this is not going to cost because a pine in an alpine region is going to be more effective at maintaining  permafrost late in the season than it is replanting in a desert.  The value of both is  rewarding and for those that live and work in the deserts. A cactus is going to make that wind storm less of a treat to the people who have used up all there stakes.

Save the anarchy quota for maturity     

Forestry management make,s for a better economic environment with more clean air so a clean air polices is also good for tourism and animals we are co dependent with  us animals and us  "yes" Wether  , I'm am an animal or not an environmentalist or sceptic , sustainable practices and development strategies in the forest are good for food production good for animals and good for the removal of carbon reduction trading,s that are not always in a platonic objective with the tree ,s.  The misnomer is that carbon CO 2 is  a health sustenance for trees its more the case that tree,s  have had to adapted to varying conditions like a deep sea diver and this is as is. As high as they can be tall type of an argument that should be used more for prevention than cure considering that tree,s are  hit by a bush fire or sand storms.

If technologies need a carbon offset shouldn't that be it,s own target to reduce with better technologies  this does not make up for environmental mismanagement practices in a different way neither does proofing the sceptic wrong with science that should not need "one once" of Gray matter to understand given past mistakes.  CFC and the  thinking of combining this with a future carbon reduction understanding is like planting tree,s to offset carbon producing technologies that produce carbon just to make CFC. Sorry i just had to put that in as a rebuttal.

We can make a big difference  planting trees  especially in places were there,s is a lot of heat build-up like along the sides of roads and at higher latitudes were people go skiing so when your  on  the next ski trip , make use out  of that gas guzzler and plant a tree were someone could brake there neck.  Call it a cloud-style services. IBM have the good idea to make a grid as good as it can be . The hope is that we make this as far reaching as could possibly be implemented. As not everyone can afford to convert the house and paying a long term tax,s to the electricity provider is understandable disembowelment if they can do a better cheaper job of the upgrade. We should have more choices and  haveing them made on our behalf. Providing the ideas for a new energy economy could make this a cost brake true this is just the needed  epiphany of effort all around combining with community project  "productivity" and sharing the Myologies.   let there be natural lighting at the supermarket and fruit tree,s in the mall.

People with the most experience are the sceptic,s and know what could be a problem antagonising with the effectiveness of an inverted chalk line. Saving the anarchy quota for maturity. Organisation is the most effective means we have of dealing with global warming it,s a cost target and the auto,motive is not going to be more proof. Its how best to use the evidence,s to reduce the impact . 100 years ago there was no need for this understanding  our forefather made mistake,s they also lived modestly improvising for there future with spade,s and hand saws. Were improvising with the complexity system renewal and costly alternatives so as to not compound the lack of innovation , for the future of innovation .

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
Uwe Paschen

Do you know about our highlight tool?

Further do you have a source for this post?


0
René

paschen,  this sounds very original. An interesting 'stream-of-consciousness' with lots of good points.

1
jumpingone

i have worked planting trees and reading about new alternatives in energy production and feel that now is not the time for more claims about the quota systems that could have been a some what flawed understand of a system that more increasingly in disarray nature may have its own carbon quota and does not need a third degree on this understanding

0
René

'Quota systems'? A totally unjust method to allow polluters to continue their polluting ways.

If only those stupid car manufacturers had developed those fuel saver cars and offered many more of them instead of hummers and suvs, maybe they wouldn't be going broke and we wouldn't be funding terrorism by buying gas.

0
jumpingone

hi rene to a small extent i have over stressed  what i was trying to say
good science can make change,s to the system and keeping improvements in practice from  marginalised cost cuts and a mess of innovations is difficult for new things we have come to except what works without questioning this proliferation of proof of meaningful

purpose the car is the  exstenshion of feedom that is hard to inprove upon and a plane is also so when something work so well forgeting that this may not be as  good as what some very smart people could give us provided they had this type of market sector slice to  research an sell the change is like asking the bank to go bankrupt on idea,s that are less apealing  as they may not capitalise in the same way makeing more problems for industries restructure and haveing to create new industries that may need 20 year of r and d  as the  car  or plane in the present configuration is how we all except what a car or plane is.  Was this the most effective way to provide freedom no  if cars were the  bear roads and oil would be there honey and a car still only travels at 100kmh  "there is" if there is a better way  theres a  need  for a very long amount of time to inprove on  strategies win over the  market place to change  for us what  before could have been less costly and now is more advance with more proven science that can be applied

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

René
First Flagged at 6:24 AM, Mar 30, 2009 by René

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from