NP Rank:
Renewable energy's black swan
Throughout humanity’s long history, our societies have gone through great lengths to create a series of academic disciplines (economics, history, politics, etc.) that help us understand the world around us. These disciplines train us to think that we should know what to expect in our world. Our expectations, though, are simply an illusion, according to Nassim Nicholas Taleb, a financial derivative mathematician by day, but a philosopher by night. He is responsible for coining the concept of a black swan event. A black swan event “refers to a large-impact, hard-to-predict, and rare event beyond the realm of normal expectations”; the renewable energy revolution is just such an event. In a talk that he gave last year he further explained the concept, in relation to events, as those which are hard to predict but that make enormous impacts upon collective society; these are events with “low predictability and high consequence”. He gives a few examples like the advent of the automobile, the onset of WWII, the Beatles, the invention of the computer, the Hubble telescope, 9/11; all of these events were unpredictable leading up to them, but looking back retrospectively at them, they were entirely likely, even predictable to some.
The basic premise of the black swan theory is that you cannot rule out a black swan simply because you have never seen one; it is a philosophical quandary with entirely real world applications.
In our modern world, we have grown entirely too comfortable in our fossil fuel kingdom; so much so that some people cannot even imagine a society powered by anything else. How will we power our cars, heat our homes, search on Google, fertilize out agriculture, fight our wars, cook our food, or call our moms without fossil fuels? Renewable energy, in its current state, is seen by many people as a hypothetical reality that may have a possibility of being implemented sometime in the future; but, for now, since our modern infrastructure is set up to revolve around fossil fuels, society has never seen a renewable energy economy. They do not know what one looks like. Taleb’s black swan proposition asks us if this kind of thinking, where we rule something out simply because we have never seen it, is rational.
In an article written in Newsweek on the last day of 2008 (no doubt to try to inspire humanity to greatness in 2009), Vinod Khosla made the following statement: “Today, the world is in the midst of an economic, social, and environmental crisis that is overturning much conventional wisdom. The best course of action is to tackle it head-on with new ideas and paradigms, fostering an environment that rewards creativity and encourages ‘black swans’." The best course of action has always been to acknowlede our black swans.
A revolution is under way; it is not a traditional revolution in that it seeks to overthrow the ruling regime in a violent manner. In fact, it seeks to incorporate the very industries it wants to replace into the new paradigm. The fossil fuel industry has run global economics and politics for more than a century now, but the tides are shifting. Events are coming together in such a way as to make way for a transition of enormous magnitude for humanity. The fossil fuel industry is well-positioned to aid in the transition by funding the switch to renewable nergy. A century from now, when society looks back at the renewable energy revolution (currently in its preflight take-off procedeures), they will view this transition as entirely predictable. From our current perspective, though, our course of action to get there is unclear; but the writing is starting to starkly outline itself on the canvas.
The business community began making its transition toward a triple-bottom-line philosophy in earnest a few years back; this philosophy includes environmental and social costs in addition to the financial concerns of a company. Using this triple-bottom-line philosophy, the concerns of all stakeholders are brought into the manufacturing process; the entire lifecycle of a product is looked at, and the sustainability of any given practice is analyzed before it is brought to commercial scale. Companies have been spending large sums of money retraining their staffs to think more holistically. Hundreds of conferences have taken place over the course of the past few years, all trying to answer the same fundamental question: “How should decision-makers in large and small companies alter their long-term strategies in order to adapt to the continuous economic and political shifts on the horizon that will ultimately transform society as we currently know it into something that functions cleaner, more efficiently, and sustainably?” One such conference, running today through Saturday in beautiful Santa Barbara, California is ECO:nomics; Creating Environmental Capital conference, presented by the Wall Street Journal.
Of course, executives would not all be sitting around discussing different shades of green if they didn’t see a need to be doing just that. President Obama has given solid indications that he has “detailed plans to raise $80 billion annually from selling carbon allowances from 2012”, but the reality of a cap-and-trade market is still a question. He has stated verbally that signing an international climate treaty is high on his wishlist of achievements for his presidency. A cap-and-trade market is an essential tool for instituting the regulations necessary to meet internationally binding emission reductions. Business executives see this scenario as a realistic probability and are making plans to adapt and adjust their strategies.
There are always students in the class that are behind the curve though, otherwise there would not be a class average. A proxy statement is a “notice that a company sends to stockholders, allowing them to vote, and giving them all the information they need to vote in an informed way”; without proper information, investors cannot assess risk accurately, and conservative investors tend to look for more dependable investments, particularly companies that disclose information about their future practices. This year, nine companies are being targeted by investors for...
_____________________
Read the full article at:
http://www.examiner.com/x-2903-Energy-Examiner
~y2009m3d3-Renewable-energys-black-swan
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
EPDaily
New York, New York, United States
Recommendations (38)
-
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan
-
A. Tran
New York, New York, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Mary Richard
Toronto, Canada -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
iamamaniac
Delhi, India


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 05:29 on March 4th, 2009
WWII and the auto mobile where very predictable though and are well documented as well. With ample warning in the case of WWII by intellectuals, some journalist and Philosopher of the time.
I do not disagree with the philosophy or concept, however even our economic melt down was predictable and predicted, however no one wanted to listen nor see the warning issued. Great post, thank you.
at 08:32 on March 4th, 2009
In the case of the automobile, the explosion into the form that it is today with an estimated one billion on the world's roads by 2020 and the current environmental and economic problems resulting from petroleum is what was unpredictable. In the case of WWII, Taleb's point was that after WWI, society began to think that the world might settle into a period of peace. Just because some people saw it coming doesn't mean that it was predictable; many people did not, as is the case in Germany. These events flash onto the world's stage and transform society forever after they do. Pearl Harbor is good example here; Adolf Hitler's rise to power and subsequent fall is one such event that took longer than, say, Pearl Harbor or 9/11 to happen, but, nonetheless was unpredictable because it was permitted to happen. Our economic meltdown, while predictable by expert analysts, took the majority of investors by surprise, otherwise we would not have seen such heavy losses. If these events had high predictability then perhaps events leading up to them would have been altered in such a way as to prevent them.
These black swan events, in the present, happen slowly; but Taleb's point is broader in its historical application. He views them as blips on the timeline of history (not to minimize them at all) with huge implications for people living after them . The renewable energy revolution fits this bill. It seems like a painstakingly slow process with all of the legislation that needs to be passed and with all of the cultural programming that needs to be rewired, but a century from now, society will look back at this moment of the dawn of the 21st century and see our time simply as a section in their history textbooks; they will be living in an altered reality based upon these events.
at 09:44 on March 4th, 2009
I do not disagree with your view here and yes the way you lay it out is correct. However in the case of the automobile the states where made in the early 20s century and no one expected the population explosion we had even though that should have been for seen since antibiotic was invented the one factor that was not predicted was the population explosion and the technological revolution as well as the internet, those where be on prediction.
Reports from 1867 do already warn of the effect of the industrial pollution and the use of fossil fuel, those warnings where repeated by many on a regular basis and with sound and solid science to back it up. The expotencialy effects where revised and recalculated almost each decade taking into account new data and growth projection same for the auto mobile, those warnings where issued already 3 generations ago and revised regularly.
We shows not to listen out of convenience and because we always keep on doing the same thinks until the iron breaks rather then stop before.
Politician and business people think in term of 4 to 10 years maximum, where as Philosopher, Scientist ... think in term of centuries and the common people think and plan with in a year or less. Why we have the troubles we do and keep on making such grand mistakes.
Rare are the leaders in human history that had the wisdom to listen and think in terms of generation rather then worry about the now and then as well as their popularity.
Would we plan for the benefit of the next generation rather then our own, then those miss haps would never happen, for the most part any how.
at 09:04 on March 4th, 2009
For anyone new to 'Black Swan' theory, if you hold rigorously to the belief that all swans are white, you may one day be surprised...
On Paschen's point, "no one wanted to listen nor see", lots of powerful people insisted on telling us all swans were white. There were of course a few dissenters even so.
at 14:32 on March 4th, 2009
We have grown too comfortable with our fossil fuel kingdom - you are right. I think Obama needs to come through on his cap and trade system rather than just talking about it, but that is only the beginning.
at 18:46 on March 4th, 2009
I'd venture to add that the public at-large needs to learn more about renewable energy in order for them to re-adjust or rather change their mindsets about fossil fuel dependency.
at 19:37 on March 4th, 2009
I was just thinking that this afternoon.
Ten years ago, not many conversations were being had regarding energy usage or alternatives, and here we are on the brink of passing sweeping legislation while the nation seems engaged in discussions on energy and alternatives to fossil fuels. Think about the knowledge-base that is building in the general public on climate change, renewable energy, environmental stewardship simply by engaging in debates and conversations on the subject.
This is a broad movement in humanity's evolution like the dawn of agriculture, the institution of religion, the Renaissance and scientific revolution, the advent of industry, the civil rights movement, ... Renewable energy will completely transform the world; what the repercussions of that will be 100 or 1000 years from now, we can only guess.
at 20:32 on March 5th, 2009
I think, when the public is sufficiently educated, for the lack of a better word, their demands will drive those business that invested in renewable energy for higher productivity. It's a basic economic concept and easier said than done, because people are still clamoring for drilling and such and used the resistance to change as their political banner/dogma rather than seeing renewable energy as a feasible alternative.
Tom Friedman's book, Hot, Flat, and Crowded advocates the US to be a leading model of renewable energy.
It's a good piece.