Scottish Climate Bill Proposed, Aggressive Reductions Promised

by TDH | December 9, 2008 at 09:39 am
190 views | 8 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

...Trossachs..Rocks..

...Trossachs..Rocks..

see larger image

uploaded by zaktari

The Scottish Government has proposed a new climate change bill that seeks a drastic reduction in GHG emissions.

The targets in the Scottish Climate Change Bill will include a 50% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and a cut of 80% by 2050.

The bill is far more aggressive than any other proposal from the international community yet and has garnered the support of opposition parties, provided such lofty proposals can be backed with action,

Opposition parties also largely welcomed the bill, but Scottish Labour's climate change spokesman Des McNulty said his party would be scrutinising the bill to ensure its words would be matched with action.


The proposal includes measures on energy efficiency, waste reduction, recycling, and packaging, in addition to limits on international aviation and shipping emissions.  The bill targets all six GHG gasses, not just CO2.

Climate Change Minister Stewart Stevenson said the bill would give Scotland the most ambitious climate change legislation anywhere in the world.

He added: "The measures set out in the bill show that Scotland is at the forefront of global efforts to tackle climate change.

"Achieving these targets will be challenging, but I am confident that government, business and the people of Scotland are ready to rise to the challenge of climate change."

The Scottish Government has pledged to reduce greenhouse gases by 80% by 2050.

The minister admitted that the targets were not an end in themselves, but stressed the importance of delivery.


If the bill is passed it would set a precedent for the international community to follow.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
RpDannan

RpDannan has contributed a photo to this story.

0
Paschen

Good on them. Hope they will follow through with it and stick to it as well.

Maybe even getting more Aggressive would be nice here in this particular case and concerning this particular issue.

0
mememine69

We can’t judge glowbull warming to just one or two or even three weather events. Judge it over millions of years. Are we willing to put our greatX5000 grand kids at risk?

Are you willing to deny children their future over 19 years of IPCC failed predicitons"

Are you willing to stretch your level of belief so as to spread misery and guilt?

Just WHAT would have to happen to prove the theory was wrong after all?

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

weehock
First Flagged at 8:16 PM, Dec 9, 2008 by weehock
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Environment

Recommendations (8)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from