NP Rank:
Sugar Dust Probable Cause of Tragic Explosion
Our prayers are out from around the globe for the families and workers of the tragic explosion at the Imperial Sugar Refinery in Port Wentworth, Georgia. Early this morning, the company CEO stated in a WTOC Channel 11 news report that sugar dust might be the probable cause.
Imperial Sugar CEO says it appears to have been a "sugar dust explosion." He said it happened in a storage silo where refined sugar is stored until it is packaged.
investigators who should be arriving shortly to assess the root causes
of the explosion. This brings back grim reminders of the BP Texas City explosion nearly three years ago on 23 March 2005. But who would of thought something as harmless as sugar dust could of caused such a tragedy, equivelant to flammable petroleum products igniting?
Explosions at sugar refineries are not a rare occurrence in the industry. Three months ago an explosion rocked the Domino Sugar Co. in Baltimore, Maryland. The cause is still under investigation and fire investigators are looking into the dust collection system as a possible cause.
Back in November 2006, the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
completed a two year investigation of industrial dust explosions and
the findings were troubling in that over the past 25 years there have
been 281 combustible dust fires in 44 states that have killed 119
workers and injured 718.
Products such as grain, flour, or sugar can develop a dangerous dust
cloud in the refining process and then all that is needed is heat and
oxygen to complete that volatile fire triangle. The ignition source can
be found in many sources such as static, friction, sparks from
machinery or electrical equipment, heat or fire.
At the root of the problem concerning the unfortunate history of
industrial dust explosions is that there is no comprehensive
governmental worker safety standard in the workplace to protect workers
as is the case in the petroleum refining industry with the Occupational
Health and Safety Administration (OSHA). Hazards of dust in the
workplace need the same precautions as working with flammable petroleum
products and need to be properly addressed in OHSA's Hazard Communication Program.
Crowd Power
-
John Astad
Santa Fe, Texas, United States
Recommendations (18)

Anonymous user








Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 04:12 on February 8th, 2008
watermon, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 04:20 on February 8th, 2008
(Just to clarify, these photos are from a 2006 explosion, right?)
at 05:43 on February 8th, 2008
Anybody have photos, videos or accounts of the explosion? Post them here.
at 07:01 on February 8th, 2008
watermon, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 09:14 on February 8th, 2008
Click here for the latest update.
at 09:53 on February 8th, 2008
Good morning Watermon! :)
I've just updated my own story on this - the report (in the comments section,) is only one hour old:
Developing Story: Explosion and Fire in Georgia
~ Swan
at 21:47 on February 9th, 2008
No, the picture of West Pharmaceutical Services in Kinston is from 2003. That incident and the CTA Acoustics incident also that year were both investigated and reported by the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) as serious dust explosions.
http://www.csb.gov/completed_investigations/docs/CSB_West_Report.pdf
http://www.chemsafety.gov/index.cfm?folder=completed_investigations&page=info&INV_ID=35