Terry Macalister on the global resurgence of coal as an energy source

by ksjhalla | August 9, 2008 at 08:04 am
258 views | 2 Recommendations | 5 comments

The last couple of years has seen a massive swing towards king coal after decades when it looked doomed to be phased out, because of acid rain and then greenhouse gases, of which it is a huge emitter. Its use in US power stations alone is responsible for 1.5bn tonnes of CO2 emissions a year.

Despite mounting fears about carbon pollution, coal has returned to fashion because rival energy sources such as gas are soaring in price and being depleted faster than expected. Coal reserves are also often located in politically stable countries such as the US, South Africa and Australia.
Coal, which has traditionally been a cheap power source, is also prized as a fuel for electricity generation because it does not have the problem of intermittency of supply associated with solar or wind, and plants do not have to be kept running all the time as they do with nuclear power.

A major study published recently by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, called The Future of Coal concluded: "We believe that coal use will increase under any foreseeable scenario because it is cheap and abundant. Coal can provide usable energy at a cost of between $1 and $2 [£0.52 to 1.04] per million British thermal units (MMBTU) compared to $6 to $12 per MMBTU for oil and natural gas."

Coal reserves worldwide are as high as 909bn tonnes, according the BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2007, which at the current rate of production of less than 6bn tonnes per year, would last for over 150 years.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
bill hicks

Coal is one of the sources of energy to be included in a comprehensive plan as long as it is clean.  One problem we do currently have is grandfathered-in coal plants cannot be tweaked to produce less pollution unless the owners bring the plant up to current standards with expensive modifications.  Some correction is better than none.  Coal should not be a political football but a sensible source for stable energy.

0
World_Groove

Coal should never be the main goal in any energy plan, but we should never allow it's use to be ruled out completely. Hopefully continued research will find ways for cleaner and cleaner use.

0
bill hicks

They do have methods to make coal clean.  The armed forces refine it into clean gasoline.  Congress does not allow the private sector to do that.  There are methods of liquifying and cleaning coal allowing for its transportation in pipelines cheaply.  Rail transportation is neither cheap source to buyer or pollution free.  Someones relative must own a railroad.

0
World_Groove

What I have read about the process is at present it is very energy demanding to convert it to clean, and the process itself has waste byproducts. Regardless, continued research is a very good thing!


One of the worst strategic decisions made in America in my opinion was to allow our rail system to fall to its current dismal state......


World_Groove
World_Groove
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 22:42 on August 9th, 2008

=-)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from