U.N. 'Climate Change' Plan 'Lunacy on Steroids'

Photos

U.N. 'Climate Change' Plan 'Lunacy on Steroids'

see larger image

uploaded by BMCWrites

Lunacy on steroids. That's how I might describe the United Nations "climate change" plan that is the subject of a recent Fox News article that caught my attention yesterday.

After reading the article by George Russell, executive editor at Fox News, I'm forced to conclude that the global warming alarmists may have finally reached the penultimate step toward ruining life as we know it on planet Earth.

Russell sums up the story in his lead paragraph:

A United Nations document on "climate change" that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

He includes a link to the document (pdf) mentioned above which deals largely with the United Nations conference set to convene March 29 in Bonn, Germany. Also available is a link to a truly-frightening document (pdf) about which Russell writes:

In an influential but highly controversial paper called "Key Elements of a Global Deal on Climate Change," British economist Nicholas Lord Stern, formerly a high British Treasury official, has declared that industrial economies would need to cut their per capita carbon dioxide emissions by "at least 80% by 2050," while the biggest economies, like the U.S.'s, would have to make cuts of 90 percent.

After reading the article, you have the option of sitting back and waiting for the global warming alarmists to reek havoc on the planet or you can fight back in a variety of ways. For instance, you can:

• CONTACT YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS;

• TELL THEM GLOBAL WARMING IS LOW ON YOUR LIST OF PRIORITIES; and

• THREATEN THEM WITH YOUR VOTE, SAYING WHATEVER IT TAKES TO CONVINCE THEM THAT THE PROPOSALS DISCUSSED IN RUSSELL'S ARTICLE ARE BASED UPON JUNK SCIENCE AND EXTREMIST POLITICAL VIEWS.

-- Bob McCarty Writes