The UK's biggest CO2 offenders unveiled

by Amy Judd | October 2, 2008 at 10:48 am
190 views | 5 Recommendations | 5 comments

Photos

Secure doors

Secure doors

see larger image

uploaded by hwatson78

Videos

Visiting London

see larger video

sourced by Amy Judd

Visiting London

The UK's biggest CO2 offenders have been revealed, and most of them are public buildings and tourist attractions.

The Palace of Westminster and the Bank of England are among the worst. A new law to measure cardon dioxide emissions exposed these numbers.

They are rated on a sliding scale, where A is the best and G is the worst. About 18,000 buildings, including schools, museums and job centres, are being tested. The Houses of Parliament and the Bank of England both scored a G.

However, much newer buildings also fared really badly, such as London's City Hall, which only opened in 2002, and that scored an E.

In Salford, the Imperial War Museum North, designed by Daniel Libeskind and opened in 2002, scored a G, the same as its 91-year-old sister museum in London.

The government estimates that almost a fifth of all carbon dioxide emissions in the UK are caused by non-residential buildings, and environmental campaigners said the findings mean the government must launch an urgent refurbishment programme to slash carbon emissions.

The Natural History Museum spends £1.4m a year on electricity and gas - a figure that is expected to double from this month as a result of rising world energy prices. One of the most energy hungry buildings in the country was the National Media Museum in Bradford, a 1960s structure, which scored a G. One in four of the 3,200 buildings assessed so far scored F or G, and the average was D. Only 22 buildings - under 1% - scored A.

"These results show our leaky and draughty public buildings should be a priority target for refurbishment," said Paul King, chief executive of the UK Green Buildings Council. "In a turbulent financial climate, lower energy bills will benefit the taxpayer for years to come. If we are to cut our carbon, save money and achieve energy security, our buildings have to be on the front line of this battle."

"We review 350 significant new build projects a year at design stage and we hear a lot of greenwash," said Matt Bell, director of public affairs at the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, the government's architecture watchdog. "The knowledge that from now on this performance will be objectively measured should mark the end of that."


Yesterday it became law that any public building larger than 1,000 square meters must display an energy certificate.
No 10 got a D rating - which is apparently not that bad for a building of its age.
Still the findings are going to embarrass the government as most of the buildings belong to them, and they have pledged to make all new public buildings zero carbon in the next ten years.
Even the Department for the Environment's head office only got an E.
If a buildig fails to display the energy certificate then they can be fined up to 150,000 UK pounds.
There are many ways that are cheap to make buildings more efficient - it's just a matter of enforcing the rules and making it mandatory for the government to have a better chance of success in making this work.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
mchawk
mchawk
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:58 on October 2nd, 2008

amyjudd, I like this story. It's good stuff.


We have all these weird rules and regulations for buildings in this country.  Finally one that might make a difference!

0
Amy Judd

I certainly hope so!

0
Beaulieu

What about Buckingham Place. (Good story by the way)

0
Amy Judd

Thanks! It didn't actually say, although I'm sure that didn't get a very good rating - I bet it's one of the worst ones!

0
king_david_uk

A lot of old buildings were not designed with energy savings in mind. It would probably cost a lot to upgrade them to make them energy efficient, and the best that can be done at present is for people who work in those buildings to avoid unnecessary energy usage. It was highlighted in the news a couple of years ago that many government buildings, which are empty at night, have all their internal lights on, wasting thousands of pounds each year and consuming quite a lot of kWh. I do not know if the people who work there now switch the lights off when the leave, but it would be a good start if they do not currently.

The place where I work is in use 24 hours a day so the lights are always on, although I suspect that cost (and kWh) savings could be made there too.




What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

mchawk
First Flagged at 1:58 PM, Oct 2, 2008 by mchawk
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Environment

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from