NP Rank:
What Caused the BP Oil Spill 2010? Halliburton, Cementing Issue?
BP Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill 2010: Halliburton Connection - Cementing of Deepwater Horizon Drill Hole At Issue?
Though it is still far too early to determine what caused the BP Oil Spill aboard the Deepwater Horizon, one avenue that is being explored is the issue of energy giant Halliburton and its oil rig "cementing" services.
Cementing essentially provides a secure casing to the walls of oil wells.
Executives from the Houston based energy industry services provider, Halliburton, are being asked to provide documents by Congress concerning the explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon and the role cementing may or may not have played.
Two members of Congress, Reps. Henry A. Waxman (D-Beverly Hills) and Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), called on Halliburton on Friday to provide all documents relating to "the possibility or risk of an explosion or blowout at the Deepwater Horizon rig and the status, adequacy, quality, monitoring, and inspection of the cementing work" by May 7.
Halliburton says it is fully cooperating with investigators regarding the Deepwater Horizon drilling rid incident and that it is far too premature to make any sort of conclusions about causes.
Halliburton will confirm the following.
- Halliburton performed a variety of services on the rig, including cementing, and had four employees stationed on the rig at the time of the accident. Halliburton's employees returned to shore safely, due, in part, to the brave rescue efforts by the U.S. Coast Guard and other organizations.
- Halliburton had completed the cementing of the final production casing string in accordance with the well design approximately 20 hours prior to the incident. The cement slurry design was consistent with that utilized in other similar applications.
- In accordance with accepted industry practice approved by our customers, tests demonstrating the integrity of the production casing string were completed.
- At the time of the incident, well operations had not yet reached the point requiring the placement of the final cement plug which would enable the planned temporary abandonment of the well, consistent with normal oilfield practice.
- We are assisting with planning and engineering support for a wide range of options designed to secure the well, including a potential relief well.
Three years ago the U.S. Minerals Management Service raised concerns regarding oil rig blow outs and the cementing of oil rigs. At the time of the accident crews on Transocean owned Deepwater Horizon were cementing the walls of the well.
A 2007 MMS study found that although blowouts with offshore drilling operations were becoming less frequent, less deadly and less polluting, cementing-associated troubles persisted.
Cementing problems were associated with 18 of 39 blowouts between 1992 and 2006, and 18 of 70 from 1971 to 1991. There were 17 blowouts in the earlier period where contributing factors
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
NowPublic Staff
Vancouver, Canada



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (107)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Kenneth Cockerham (not verified)at 15:16 on May 3rd, 2010
The Cementing operations were not the cause of the blowout. As a Drilling Supt w/ 45 yrs experience working offshore in different areas of the world, I know this was not the cause. Even if they had a bad cement job, there are ways to check it, & do remedial operations to fix that. They can start looking somewhere else for the blame.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
C...... (not verified)at 03:52 on May 24th, 2010
33 1/2 years as mud/completion/workover fluid engineer & drilling consultant doesn't make me & expert but a poor cement job may have been the 'ORIGINAL' problem, but It didnot cause the blowout. 'BAD DECISION/HUMAN ERROR' after cementing will be the blowout problem. Was the casing hanger set & tested? Was there already gas in the riser & no one knew it? When was all the +/-14.3ppg mud displaced with +/-8.55ppg seawater, before or after differentially testing the casing hanger? Was the casing hanger running tool, drill pipe tool joint or casing itself opposite the BOP shear rams preventing them form closing? So many unanswered questions!!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
oilandgas (not verified)at 21:02 on June 8th, 2010
Here's the deal! First off, we need to always remember that accidents happen. When an accident happens, we need to recognize that people suffer. God Bless the families of the lost hard working people that suffered this tradegy. There have been more than 30,000 wells drilled in the GOM since they have started drilling. This is the first significant disaster! Although it is the first and largest, oil companies need to prepare for this each and every time. No exceptions! They will and have prepared for this to this point. They will prepare again! It's easy to say that they are greedy when something like this happens, stop that! They are delivering the product that we use most and we desperately need it. Whether you like companies making money or not, most of us are glad that we don't have to ride a bike or horse anymore. Now, a blowout almost never happens when drilling is completed unless these things happen. First, drilling mud is extracted before bottom hole plug is placed and tested. Second, drilling mud is extracted before second plug is tested. So forth and so on. Most all blowouts happen when drilling is ongoing and higher psi is encountered and it is not prepared for. Evidently this is not the case with this well. My perdiction is that someone dropped the ball with the cement plugs, mud weight, fault fracture(meaning that after drilling was complete and cement was tested, a parallel fault/production sand ruptured the targeted sand which overcame all drilling mud, cement with psi, etc...). Just my thaughts, and again my heart goes out to the working people that lost their lives and their families. We need to pay attention to the working people lost and we need more of them in this country, TAX PAYERS! Continue on American oilfield, we can't lose you!!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Shamrock (not verified)at 04:41 on June 9th, 2010
It seems like everyone is trying to figure out how this accident could have happened. Isn't it possible that it was not an accident? Shouldn't the first order of business be to determine whether or not it was in fact an accident? When someone drops dead unexpectedly, isn't the first order of business to decide who would have something to gain by the death, a motive? Why are we ignoring common sense?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Duc Huynh (not verified)at 11:50 on June 12th, 2010
Is there a terrorism act? Why hasn't US military, or Marine involved? What if next time, the enemies knows this target and hits hard? How about Mr. Al Gore? Your Green strategy, plans, may be your "owned" green corporations might provide some services to this clean up. Then you might earn another Nobel Prize Medal.How about home land security? The public heard none. This is a true man made terror/disaster, compare to other "natural disasters".
- Sign In or Join to post comments
BobL (not verified)at 15:26 on June 19th, 2010
I'm with you on this, I did some research and found some very good info that makes one really look at this a little deeper. Look at hubpages.com/hub/oilspill
- Sign In or Join to post comments
DUbb (not verified)at 13:10 on June 20th, 2010
The masses will flock like sheep.....
- Sign In or Join to post comments
GHETTO YOUTH (not verified)at 06:06 on June 26th, 2010
i most certainly agree this is a crock of bull because yesterday they discovered another oil spill off of egypt in the red sea..........HMMMMM.........Sound kind of FISHY if you know wat i mean.its deeper than you think the new world order is most certainly in affect
- Sign In or Join to post comments
L shummen (not verified)at 22:03 on July 4th, 2010
Um, no. The first order of business should always be to help sick/injured/dying... in his case, cleaning up the oil. Then thoroughly investigate what went wrong and prevent it from ever happening again.Losing your head and calling 'terror' doesn't help anyone.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
abrown231 (not verified)at 07:30 on July 12th, 2010
I totally agree. It was indeed no accident. Nor was it a coincidence that it happened to be BRITISH Petroleum.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
jgd (not verified)at 08:42 on July 15th, 2010
Is paranoia inherent in the make up of USA residents?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
George84 (not verified)at 12:46 on June 10th, 2010
What about the Ixtoc I oil spill 1979 which occurred in the bay of Campeche in the GOM?Took 10 months to cap the blow out during which time 10 000 - 30 000 barrels of oil where discharged into the Gulf everyday.
at 09:09 on June 13th, 2010
here is my take on it, so many companies are cutting corners to max out there profits, they cut corners and safety, they issue out safety hand books, company policies etc. just to make them selves look and appear to be in compliance with the federal and state regulations, they push us in the field to complete our jobs ahead of schedules, yea they say safety is number one, but the reality of business is get in get out and we'll worry about any problems later if they occur. and when problems do occur due to this push attitude, there is always a fall guy if you will. and when this happens the companies never admit guilt, its pushed to someone else to take the rap, well we as a nation are the fall guys, we accept what we are told and what facts are presented to us, are we that stupid that we accept the bs that is being said? no not always but this mistake that has happened will take generations to recover from if ever, our fuel prices will sore sky high, and the ripple effect is only to come, and we as a nation will be left to pick up the pieces and pay for this. we'll all these smart people making our choices for us really are so smart there stupid. how about lets figure out how to get this cleaned up before we start pointing blame. we know what happened! there is oil spilling into the ocean. so here is the bottom line. how are we going to stop it and how are we going to prevent this from ever happening again!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
fool (not verified)at 00:23 on June 20th, 2010
Wrong, this is not the first major GOM spill. If you lived in the Gulf your tone about accidents may be very different.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
ariana jenkins (not verified)at 15:56 on June 20th, 2010
hi there my name is ariana and i am studying the oil spill in school and i cant find the answer to how the oil spill happened
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Joe Blocks (not verified)at 14:35 on June 12th, 2010
Fine I respect your experience but let's let an inquiry determine that. Some factsAround 40% of BP shares are held by UK shareholders, and 39% in the USA. The UK dividends represent approximately one-seventh of all dividend payments in the UK and form the basis of many pension schemes. British Petroleum merged with Amoco (formerly Standard Oil of Indiana) in December 1998,becoming BP Amoco plc. In 2000, BP Amoco acquired Arco (Atlantic Richfield Co.) and Burmah Castrol plc. In 2001 the company formally renamed itself as BP plc and adopted the tagline "Beyond Petroleum," which remains in use todayThe rig was :-US BuiltUS OwnedUS OperatedSo how come BP or "British Petroleum" as Obama likes to refer to it still, comes in for 100% of the blame before all the facts are in?Piper Alpha in the North Sea, when that blew up killed 167 people - owned by Occidental - Maggie Thatcher did not demonize them as Obama/CNN etc is trying to do to BP
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Thomas Kettering (not verified)at 08:09 on June 15th, 2010
If the cement didn't fail the blowout preventer would have had no job to do, had it not failed.Your argument is invalid.You should be aware Halliburton are involved in 18 proven or suspected cement failures out of 36 deep water projects.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
InfoWars.com (not verified)at 14:31 on June 20th, 2010
Definitely a "False Flag Operation".If this was not the result of faulty cement, then one has to ask ones self, why, after so many different drilling disasters, with the billions if not trillions of dollars spent on the very best high priced consulting and management, could this NOT be the INTENDED outcome.And IF this was an INTENDED outcome, then WHY would they want this to happen?Could it be that they want to ratchet up the desire of Americans to accept a "Carbon Credit Taxation System"? Obama and many others have been pushing for such a thing..... something that will tax the very breath you exhale.Did you know, that BP directly profits from such a system and they have been lobbying for Cap and Trade for years now?Did you know that the CEO of BP cashed in a HUGE number of his stock in his own company just prior to the spill..... did you know that Goldman Sachs (remember them from the "toxic asset" Bank Bailout?) sold over 40% of THEIR stock in BP just prior to the blowout in the Gulf?Did you know that Haliburton, who was in charge of the Blowout Preventers and Well Head construction bought an oil spill cleanup company (Boots & Coots) just days prior to the disaster?Did you know, that while we were all concentrating on this, that our Senate is ginning up another bill that will restrict our free speech on the Internet by blocking sites we go to and that the Rumsfeld era spying on Americans is about to resume under a different name?Wake up people... the news is not the news... it's a video blindfold that enslaves you.How long are we going to ask questions and not get answers? What happens when we don't get answers? Do we start retaliating or do we just slink back into our easy chairs and pop another cold one, raising hell at one side or the other?We will keep getting the same results unless we take a stand. All at once. Take down the banks, the bankers, the corporations and the politicians that have allowed this on their watch. Read, learn and listen and stop allowing these profit mongers to influence you with chump change... we want REAL CHANGE!Raise Hell in YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD NOW!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
abrown231 (not verified)at 07:41 on July 12th, 2010
Very well stated!!! Nothing that occurs at that level is an accident. Simply look at who profits, and you have your culprit! We can put a man on the moon (supposedly), but we can't drill oil safely??? Oh now the American people will agree we need foreign oil, carbon tax, and increases gas/oil prices. How terribly Toyota was villanized recently when their sales began exceeding big oil car companies. Coincidence? How many lives were taken and risked by big oil cars resulting in massive recalls? Were those companies villanized to the same extreme? We must not be so naive to believe this was an unfortunate accident. Do some research and be suspicious, very suspicious!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Greg Davis (not verified)at 17:20 on May 3rd, 2010
I concur. This accident could not have happened during cementing operations.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
KenK (not verified)at 13:44 on May 5th, 2010
To you and the arrogant "Drilling Supervisor" above --The day of the blowout I heard from several "oil rig workers with X years of experience" who (after screaming at the 'tree hugging libs') said that it was IMPOSSIBLE for oil to leak out of the well since it was 'obviously' only a Natural Gas well... Is it politics or the smug overconfidence that comes with experience that leads people like you to pontificate with 100% SURETY about things that you are not 'in the loop' about? How can you say "I KNOW that this was not the cause"???If you are not sure, perhaps you can have the modesty to say "I do not BELIEVE this was the cause" because we don't believe you anymore. Fool me once, shame on me, etc.Try modesty for a change, it would sure help the world know who to listen to and who NOT to.Now, check out this link, Mr. Smart Drill Superintendant and tell us what you think of the Halliburton Powerpoint presentation WARNING that methane crystals + deepwater cementing can lead to blowouts!!!!seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/44349At least you didn't call me a "godless libtard" yet.... YET.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
KenK (not verified)at 13:45 on May 5th, 2010
seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/44349
- Sign In or Join to post comments
DaveScotland (not verified)at 03:15 on June 2nd, 2010
Please read properly what the man has said and at least respect the man's knowledge gained if not his profession. What he said was that it may have been the original problem. There are bad cement jobs all the time - that's not the issue. It's the actions of those following that which are to blame. He commented on this also.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
no discounts (not verified)at 19:41 on May 3rd, 2010
Actually, a bad cement job could very well have been the contributing factor if the cement didn't go where it was supposed to go, ie. hypothetically - if it fractured the formation due to excessive hydrostatic from cement column then pre-flush lightened the hydrostatic to induce a kick which was left unchecked - remember, later on BOP's were closed while they subsequently pressure tested and displaced the Riser to sea water. Gas could have been bubbling in and moving up to be under the BOP all the while - so when the BOP's were finally opened (thinking they had a good cement job), instead there is a massive kick. They should have been monitoring pressures below the BOP's - but were they?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
sociostudent1983 (not verified)at 09:57 on May 4th, 2010
By "checking the pressures", would that have anything to do with Accenture, the baby company of Halliburton who builds network security systems and who's website (www.accenture.com/Global/Services/Accenture_Technology_Labs/R_and_I/IndustryIndustries.htm) talks about how they make sensors for oil rig use for just that reason? "Whether they are placed on oil rigs to provide a continuous report of conditions or within chemical tanks to measure temperature and weight, sensors' ability to gather and communicate data remotely have already added efficiency and value to these high-touch areas of the business." Were they just "taking the day off", or something?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
sociostudent1983 (not verified)at 09:57 on May 4th, 2010
By "checking the pressures", would that have anything to do with Accenture, the baby company of Halliburton who builds network security systems and who's website (www.accenture.com/Global/Services/Accenture_Technology_Labs/R_and_I/IndustryIndustries.htm) talks about how they make sensors for oil rig use for just that reason? "Whether they are placed on oil rigs to provide a continuous report of conditions or within chemical tanks to measure temperature and weight, sensors' ability to gather and communicate data remotely have already added efficiency and value to these high-touch areas of the business." Were they just "taking the day off", or something?
at 07:44 on May 4th, 2010
Thanks for the expert comments on cementing from both perspectives.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
no discounts (not verified)at 19:24 on May 4th, 2010
The Halliburton sensors would not cover the type of activity required in the case of the Deepwater Horizon. If the rig had these types of sensors they would have been used for monitoring surface facilities (likely only Halliburton supplied equipment).
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Kenk (not verified)at 13:48 on May 5th, 2010
www.seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/44349 This link shows Halliburton's internal Powerpoint detailing risks of deepwater blowout from cementing issues. REALLY REALLY HATE YOU APOLOGISTS FOR BIG OIL CAUSE YOU HATE DEMOCRATS. REALLY TIRED OF YOU ALL.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
GozieBoy (not verified)at 11:03 on June 13th, 2010
Kent, you godless libertard (at your request...!), believe it or not, there ARE many experts in the area of drilling operations (myself being but one). Many may "say" that they are in blogs as this one to try and give false creedence to their loony arguments, but others may actaully know what they are talking about. It is obvious that you have zero technical knowldge on these matters. The fact is that a combination of problems and failures created this event - it is NEVER a single event or problem because there will ALWAYS be backup systems and procedures designed to prevent this from happening (as there always are) but that multiple failures occurred. Why after all of this time has Obama NEVER even talked with the CEO of BP? Now THAT is unimaginable mismanagement of the first order!