NP Rank:
Evangelicalism is shifting toward GLBT acceptance
There is no disputing the trend: Christian evangelicalism in America is tilting more and more toward a bias in favor of acceptance of gays and gay rights.
To optimists, this is a sign of progress. To pessimists, it is a Trojan horse for a liberal and politically correct agenda which will topple the Church and society. As their picture depicts, it is not just a slippery slope, but a dangerous cliff.
This piece, from Apprising Ministries:
The author is wary of a certain evangelical who is using a pro-gay theology which is taken from the Liberal Theology. Now , for some time, the doctrine of Liberal theology has indeed been tipping toward a counter-traditionalism; it is clear that the Episcopalian church was not the only one which had embraced ideology formerly reserved for the Unitarians.
From the 1970s on, with the Christian existentialist writings such as those of Karl Jaspers, Paul Tillich, Niclaus Berdyaev, and others, gaining ever more popularity, this shift was activated by the secret animus of theologians who had imbibed this view of Christianity.
Reinhold Niebuhr - studied avidly and adopted as the favorite philosopher of President Barack Obama in his student days - probably did more to modernize Christian theology and bring it in line with pluralistic democratic principles than any other American thinker.
Whatever we choose to make of this, Christian evangelical doctrine has not been able to defend itself against a growing democratic pluralism:
I will say this: I think we can see Cornerstone as a sort of belwether of evangelicalism. Five and ten years ago, the seminar tents were populated with seminars on modern, evidential apologetics . . . and pro-life stragegy sessions. Today, the seminars are on creation care, developing new monastic communities, centering prayer, and human rights.Phyllis Tickle and I talked about the great emergence. And, for the first time at Cornerstone, Christians who favor gay rights and GLBT inclusion in the church were allowed to speak alongside those from “ex-gay” ministries.
This is the shift that’s taking place in evangelicalism, people. Get ready for it. (Online source, bold his)
Jones is correct; this shift is underway, which is why in articles like Emerging Church To TransFORM Outlaw Preachers—a largely biblically illiterate group headed by Jones’ friend gay affirming “pastor” Jay Bakker—I’ve been warning you that there’s a very dark and threatening same-sex storm right now approaching hurricane force and which, is currently only slightly off the coast of your own local church. . .
Arguments Of Modern Theology Reimagined For Postmodern Theology Just As Wrong
You will see in Who Is Phyllis Tickle? that’s a very apt title concerning her own views of Christianity. There’s another reason that I mentioned Jones’ post on Cornerstone 2009; not only was Phyllis Tickle there, but in his post Looking Back on Cornerstone – The Gays Have Their Day Jones also informs us:
Probably the most anticipated element of Cornerstone that I was involved with was a panel discussion entitled, “Gay Rights or Wrongs,” which was a conversation about how the church should approach the issue of GLBT persons… On the panel with me were Rich Amesbury, a professor of ethics at Claremont School of Theology, Andrew Marin of theMarin Foundation, Christine Sneeringer from Worthy Creations Ministry, and Frank Carrasco of Exodus International. (Online source, bold mine)
Marin tells us in Part 1: Andrew Interviews Phyllis Tickle, “I had the opportunity to interview Phyllis Tickle”. Then he says:
She has some very clear thoughts on the shifting culture of Christianity and how that relates to gays and lesbians, and I’m wondering what you think of all she said in this first part of the interview? (Online source)
And then in Part 2: Andrew Interviews Phyllis Tickle Marin tells us:
This video is Part 2 which answers the question, What does Phyllis Tickle communicate to her congregation, that is 80% GLBT, about straight Christians and Christianity in general? What do you think about what she said? (Online source)
She’s simply rehashing arguments from the original Cult of Liberal theology, and reintroducing the same rhetoric, which would cause the now mortally wounded mainline denominations to cut loose their anchor of Sola Scriptura in favor of highly subjective Contemplative Spirituality/Mysticism; in other words, it’s the same spiritual sewerage spewed e.g. by Living Spiritual Teacher and “Progessive Christian” scholar Marcus Borg. It’s all been heard before; and there’s no new evidence, we’ve also seen it before.
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 08:35 on November 16th, 2009
I reviewed the website apprising.org and this is what I have to say about it: reading Ken Silva gives me a headache! His form of theology is to negate and criticize all the other forms of Christianity out there. He is anti-Catholic as well as anti-other Christian churches (the ones accepting of gays). He does not follow in the tradition of the other Christian writers you mention above.
at 08:57 on November 16th, 2009
Yes, you are correct. Thanks for your comments and recommend! No, he is no Christian existentialist, is he?
at 09:17 on November 16th, 2009
You're welcome, yes to elaborate, mainstream Protestant churches such as Presbyterianism and Methodism have a much more nuanced explanations of their stance on homosexuality than Ken Silva's does. Actually I can't answer whether Silva fails at being a Christian existentialist, because I'm not up on the definition of one. Would like to state what the definition of one is?
at 13:00 on November 16th, 2009
Oh just saw this, sorry I missed it :( I define it as the Father of it did, Soren Kierkeggard: That Christian faith has nothing to do with 'Christendom' or organized Christianity: it is a stance, toward one's inner self, before God: It has little to do with the Old Testament and more to do with Jesus and his words, his "stance". There is no dogma, no ritual, but a "sense of being before existence". Too complicated to say all in a post, but Kierkegarrd was on target.
at 20:59 on November 16th, 2009
That's sounds pretty simple to understand, though I know reading Soren Kierkeggard isn't easy because I couldn't "get him" without a teacher. But two other writers, the French ones, Gabriel Marcel and Jacques Maritain are also important and a little more easy to understand than Kierkeggard on what is "Christian Existentialism"? Thanks for your follow up, smk!
at 09:00 on November 16th, 2009
And he has a deadly fear of the emerging evangelical movement: http://apprising.org/2009/11/emerging-church-to-transform-outlaw-preachers/