GAO: 190,000 AK-47s Missing From Iraq

by Brian A Kennedy | August 6, 2007 at 10:47 am
896 views | 8 Recommendations | 7 comments

Photos

US Military scenario for a "New Middle East Order"

US Military scenario for a "New Middle East Order"

see larger image

uploaded by Daniel Neun

A new report by the General Accounting Office claims that about 190,000 AK-47s -- as well as a variety of other weaponry -- provided to the Iraqi Army and Police went missing from 2004-2005, when the vaunted Gen. Petraeus was running the troop-training program.

Granted, a lot of this probably couldn't be helped -- they were providing weapons to Iraqi forces who were literally just going into battle, and they would have drawn a lot of criticism had they been stingier about handing them out -- and it's not like the country wouldn't have been awash in AK-47s (from smugglers, old Iraqi Army stocks, etc.), but it's ironic to think that the US is one of the insurgents' main arms suppliers.

BTW, check out some informative comments from our member phrolen below.

The Pentagon has lost track of about 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and pistols given to Iraqi security forces in 2004 and 2005, according to a new government report, raising fears that some of those weapons have fallen into the hands of insurgents fighting U.S. forces in Iraq.

 
The author of the report from the Government Accountability Office says U.S. military officials do not know what happened to 30 percent of the weapons the United States distributed to Iraqi forces from 2004 through early this year as part of an effort to train and equip the troops. The highest previous estimate of unaccounted-for weapons was 14,000, in a report issued last year by the inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.

   
The United States has spent $19.2 billion trying to develop Iraqi security forces since 2003, the GAO said, including at least $2.8 billion to buy and deliver equipment. But the GAO said weapons distribution was haphazard and rushed and failed to follow established procedures, particularly from 2004 to 2005, when security training was led by Gen. David H. Petraeus, who now commands all U.S. forces in Iraq.

 
The Pentagon did not dispute the GAO findings, saying it has launched its own investigation and indicating it is working to improve tracking. Although controls have been tightened since 2005, the inability of the United States to track weapons with tools such as serial numbers makes it nearly impossible for the U.S. military to know whether it is battling an enemy equipped by American taxpayers.

 
"They really have no idea where they are," said Rachel Stohl, a senior analyst at the Center for Defense Information who has studied small-arms trade and received Pentagon briefings on the issue. "It likely means that the United States is unintentionally providing weapons to bad actors."

 
One senior Pentagon official acknowledged that some of the weapons probably are being used against U.S. forces. He cited the Iraqi brigade created at Fallujah that quickly dissolved in September 2004 and turned its weapons against the Americans.

 
Stohl said insurgents frequently use small-arms fire to force military convoys to move in a particular direction -- often toward roadside bombs. She noted that the Bush administration frequently complains that Iran and Syria are supplying insurgents but has paid little attention to whether U.S. military errors inadvertently play a role. "We know there is seepage and very little is being done to address the problem," she said.

 
Stohl noted that U.S. forces, focused on a fruitless search for weapons of mass destruction after Baghdad fell, did not secure massive weapons caches. The failure to track small arms given to Iraqi forces repeats that pattern of neglect, she added.

 
The GAO is studying the financing and weapons sources of insurgent groups, but that report will not be made public. "All of that information is classified," said Joseph A. Christoff, the GAO's director of international affairs and trade.

 
In an unusual move, the train-and-equip program for Iraqi forces is being managed by the Pentagon. Normally, the traditional security assistance programs are operated by the State Department, the GAO reported. The Defense Department said this change permitted greater flexibility, but as of last month it was unable to tell the GAO what accountability procedures, if any, apply to arms distributed to Iraqi forces, the report said.

 
Iraqi security forces were virtually nonexistent in early 2004, and in June of that year Petraeus was brought in to build them up. No central record of distributed equipment was kept for a year and a half, until December 2005, and even now the records are on a spreadsheet that requires three computer screens lined up side by side to view a single row, Christoff said.

 
The GAO found that the military was consistently unable to collect supporting documents to "confirm when the equipment was received, the quantities of equipment delivered, and the Iraqi units receiving the equipment." The agency also said there were "numerous mistakes due to incorrect manual entries" in the records that were maintained.

 
The GAO reached the estimate of 190,000 missing arms -- 110,000 AK-47s and 80,000 pistols -- by comparing the property records of the Multi-National Security Transition Command for Iraq against records Petraeus maintained of the arms and equipment he had ordered. Petraeus's figures were compared with classified data and other records to ensure that they were accurate enough to compare against the property books.

 
In all cases, the gaps between the two records were enormous. Petraeus reported that about 185,000 AK-47 rifles, 170,000 pistols, 215,000 pieces of body armor and 140,000 helmets were issued to Iraqi security forces from June 2004 through September 2005. But the property books contained records for 75,000 AK-47 rifles, 90,000 pistols, 80,000 pieces of body armor and 25,000 helmets.

 
A military commander involved in the program at the time, speaking on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the report, acknowledged in an e-mail, "We did issue some items, including weapons, body armor, etc. to new Iraqi units that were literally going into battle."

 
But, the commander argued, "there was, frankly, not much of a choice early on: We had very little staff and could have held the weapons until every piece of the logistical and property accountability system was in place, or we could issue them, in bulk on some occasions, to the U.S. elements supporting Iraqi units who were needed in the battles of Najaf, Fallujah, Mosul, Samarra, etc."

 
The GAO plans to look for similar problems in the training of Afghan security forces.

 
During the Bosnian conflict, the United States provided about $100 million in defense equipment to the Bosnian Federation Army, and the GAO found no problems in accounting for those weapons.

 
Much of the equipment provided to Iraqi troops, including the AK-47s, originates from countries in the former Soviet bloc. In a report last year, Amnesty International said that in 2004 and 2005 more than 350,000 AK-47 rifles and similar weapons were taken out of Bosnia and Serbia, for use in Iraq, by private contractors working for the Pentagon and with the approval of NATO and European security forces in Bosnia.



Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
phrolen

Brian,

 I posted on another story like this one the other day outlining the cause of this. I have first hand knowledge. The reason is because of the troop rotation process you have a steady stream of troops rotating in and out of there on a 1 year (Army, 7 month (Marine), and 4-6 month basis (Air Force). The new guys come in and comingle with the old guys for about 3 days and then the old guys leave. There is huge polotical pressure to make these transitions quick and get troops home. What happens is that a very limited amount of information gets transmitted over from outgoing to incoming guys and the officer corps of the incoming guys want to remake the operation alwheel anyways for performance report purposes. Much of what the last unit was doing gets picked up, but more in overarching terms. Once those weapons are transferred to the Iraqi's they become Iraqi Army/ Iraqi National Gaurd assets and we have no operational oversight on them. There is simply no con-op for oversight or reconstitution efforts over foreign partner assets. I suspect that the individuals at the GAO know this but are releasing the report in "Witch hunt" rhetoric for political reasons. Take it from me, I did supply chain management in Iraq, this is not a silver bullet, its procedural and there is no way given the ops tempo that we can account for every Item that we put on the ground in Iraq. Also when we pack up and leave, you can bet you bottom dollar that the materials we have brought into country thus far, besides heavy equipment, will be left where they are signed over to support Iraqi Army ING operation. We dont do much reconstitution.  

0
ryan

phrolen,

this is wonderful insight into the report. your comment is very valuable in understandsting this situation!

ryan
ryan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:49 on August 6th, 2007

Brian A Kennedy, thanks for posting this - but more thanks to phrolen for his first hand insight. Good Stuff.

Vinny
Vinny
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:58 on August 6th, 2007

Thanks Brian for this important story and thanks phrolen as well.

0
Brian A Kennedy

phrolen,

Wow, interesting stuff; I figured it was a lot more complicated than "Stupid US Army lost 190,000 rifles," and in any case bringing AK-47s to Iraq is sort of like bringing coal to Newcastle. I'm still surprised that any attempt wasn't made to keep track of serial numbers to match them against weapons used in insurgent attacks, etc. -- was there ever any attempt along these lines that I just didn't hear about?

0
Tom van B

This is a truly fascinating and absolutely unbelievable story!.

0
phrolen

Brian, when I left Iraq, you could no joke buy an Ak-47 in Baghdad for about a buck and a half. I know it seems crazy but thats the truth

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from